Hilchos Choshen Mishpat
Volume I : Number 16
Surplus Charity Funds
A member of Reuven's community became ill, and required highly
specialized medical treatment in another country that was only available
at a very high cost. Reuven decided to organize a campaign to raise funds
for this cause. Everyone responded very generously, and more funds came
in than were actually needed. Reuven is now asking what should be done
with the additional funds.
- If the cause for the surplus was because the sick person did not
actually require all of the treatments that had been originally
anticipated, or if money was collected for this cause and ultimately, for
whatever reason, the sick person did not undergo the treatments, Reuven
must return the money to those who had donated it. If he is no longer
able to identify who the original donors were, or if it would be a very
large expense to identify and return the money to them, the unused money
should be used to help defray the medical expenses of another needy,
sick, person. They should not be diverted to a different type of charity.
- If the patient did receive all or some of the treatments necessary,
but more money came in than was actually needed, the surplus funds belong
to the sick person and his family. This is true even if the patient
passed away during the course of the treatment or afterward.
- In the above case (B), if Reuven is a well known charity collector for
various causes, if he would require these funds for another cause he
would be permitted to divert these funds for that cause. If, however, he
is just a friend who took the initiative this one time for this one
cause, he would be obligated to give the surplus to the patient or his
- If Reuven ran his campaign on behalf of a recognized public charity
fund or medical assistance program, (as is frequently done for tax
purposes), he would be permitted to use the surplus funds for another
charitable purpose, even if this is the only time that he has tried to
raise money for charity. This is true even though the money had been
collected for a specific needy or sick person.
The Mishna in Shekalim (2:5) states "Surplus of the poor - to the poor.
Surplus of a specific poor person - to that person." The Raav (HaRav
Ovadiah MiBartenura) there explains this Mishna as follows: If funds were
collected for a specific poor person, and there was a surplus, these
funds should be given to that person anyway even if he is presently not
needy. [The reason for this is very interesting. The Yerushalmi on this
Mishna states that in exchange for the embarrassment suffered by the poor
person due to the fact that a collection had to be made specifically for
him, he and his estate acquire any surplus that may come in due to this
collection]. However, if a general collection was made for the poor but
not for one specific individual, if it was for a specific cause for the
poor, such as clothing or medical expenses, and there is a surplus, the
funds should not be given to the poor for other purposes. They should
only be used for the purpose that it was expressly collected for. This is
stated as the Halacha in Shulchan Oruch (Yoreh Deah 253:6-7).
The Yerushalmi there states, however, that if at the time of the
collection we thought that this person was needy, and after the
collection we find that he really was not needy, he has no right to these
funds at all. The Rosh (Teshuvos HaRosh Klal 32 Siman 6) adds that the
same would apply in the case of a collection for an individual's medical
expenses, if the patient would be cured, or (R"L) die before the
treatment started, or if the doctors decided that the proposed treatment
that they had collected for was not appropriate after all. The donors
intended to donate their funds for the express purpose of providing this
individual the treatment that he could not afford, and this treatment was
never rendered. The Shulchan Oruch (ibid.) and the Gr'a (ibid. 14) agree
with the Rosh regarding this. Therefore, prescribes the Rosh, preferably,
the money must be returned to the donors. If they can not be identified,
or if the expense would be too great, the money may be used for a
different individual but for the same cause for which it was originally
The Yerushalmi there adds, that if money was collected for a specific
needy person by officers of a charity fund or any other person who is
known in the community to collect for various charities and, there are
surplus funds, they may be used for other charitable purposes. However,
the Rosh, the Raav, and the Shach (Yoreh Deah 256:7) all state that this
should only be done if absolutely necessary at this time (Tzorech
Sha'ah). But in the case of an individual collecting for a friend,
everyone agrees that the collector may not divert surplus funds for other
purposes, and we remain with the Halacha as stated in the above mentioned
Mishna - "Surplus of a specific poor person - to that poor person".
This week's class is based on a column by Rabbi Tzvi Shpitz, who is an
Av Bet Din and Rosh Kollel in the Ramot neighborhood of Jerusalem. His
column originally appears in Hebrew in Toda'ah, a weekly publication in
Jerusalem. It has been translated and reprinted here with his
permission and approval.
This class is translated and moderated by Rabbi Aaron Tendler of Yeshivas
Ner Yisroel in Baltimore. Rabbi Tendler accepts full responsibility for
the accuracy of the translation and will be happy to fax originals of the
articles in Hebrew to anyone interested.
Feedback is appreciated! It can be sent to firstname.lastname@example.org.
We hope you find this class informative and stimulating! If you do not see a subscription form to the left
of the screen, access the Advanced Learning Network to
subscribe to Business-Halacha.
For information on subscriptions, archives, and other Project Genesis
classes, send mail to email@example.com for an automated reply. For
subscription assistance, send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Please Note: The purpose of this column is to make people aware of Choshen Mishpat
situations that can arise at any time, and the Halachic concepts that may be used to resolve them. Each
individual situation must be resolved by an objective, competent Bais Din (or Rabbinic Arbitrator) in the
presence of all parties involved!
A Different Kind of Friend
Rabbi Yochanan Zweig - 5770
Rabbi Chaim Flom - 5767
Conquer the Physical
Rabbi Yaakov Menken - 5755
The Sin of "Not Getting It"
Rabbi Yissocher Frand - 5767
Rabbi Yochanan Zweig - 5772
Three Festivals: The Holy Journey
Rabbi Osher Chaim Levene - 5767
Reflecting on G-d
Rabbi Moshe Peretz Gilden - 5762
Bilam: A Perfect Tzadik?
Shlomo Katz - 5761
Forever a Donkey
Rabbi Naftali Reich - 5767
Mixed Multitude of Troubles
Rabbi Pinchas Winston - 5760
A Question Brings Hope
Shlomo Katz - 5765
Rabbi Raymond Beyda - 5763
Symbolism Over Substance
Rabbi Mordechai Kamenetzky - 5759
A Great Responsibility
Shlomo Katz - 5768
The Epitome of Righteousness
Rabbi Naftali Reich - 5768
Is Sincerity at Steak?
Rabbi Mordechai Kamenetzky - 5761