Reuven studied in a Hebrew day school as a child. Due to financial
difficulties, his parents were unable to pay the full amount of the
tuition owed, and even after graduation from the school there remained a
$1000 debt to the school. Over the years since Reuven left the school, the
administration continued to request that Reuven's parents settle their
debt for the money owed. Reuven's parents always responded by saying that
they are not yet able to do so.
After a number of years, Reuven was hired as a teacher in the same school
that he had studied in, as a child. To his surprise, his first paycheck
was considerably less than he had expected it to be. Upon inquiry, he was
informed that the school administration had decided to deduct the $1000
owed by his parents for his education, from his paycheck. Their rationale
for this is that Reuven was only able to become a teacher and earn this
money due to the education provided by the school, which was not fully
paid for. Therefore, Reuven should not benefit from this money at the
expense of the school.
Reuven replied that this is an issue between the school and his parents,
and the school has no right to withhold any of the salary that he has
Is the school permitted to keep the money that they withheld to compensate
for the unpaid tuition?
Reuven is correct, and the school has no right to withhold any of his
salary to pay for his parent's tuition debt.
If Reuven's parents have passed away, or if it seems that they will
never be able to pay their debt owed to the school, it is proper for
Reuven to pay their debt for them, if he is able to. The reason for this
is because Reuven would be removing his parent's from the category of
"Loveh Rosha V'Lo Yishalem" - A Wicked Man Borrows And Does Not Repay
(Tehillim 37:21), as well as the category of those who do not pay for
services provided for them, thus fulfilling the Mitzvah of Kibbud Av V'Eym
(Honoring One's Parents).
If the only way for Reuven to pay off his parent's debt is by using
Ma'aser (Charity) funds, he is permitted to do so.
If Reuven has other siblings, the Mitzvah of Kibbud Av V'Eym is
incumbent upon all of them. Therefore, it is proper that all of the
siblings divide among themselves their parent's debt, despite the fact the
actual debt was a result of the expense of Reuven's education.
The Shulchan Oruch in Choshen Mishpat (107:1) states the following; "There
is a Mitzvah on the inheritors to pay the debts of their father, even if
their father only left Mitaltelin (movable items - as opposed to Karka -
real estate, non-movable items) as their inheritance." The Sm'a, over
there, (1) explains this Halacha as follows: Although, according to the
Torah, debtors have no right to claim payment for money owed to them by
the deceased from Mitaltelin that the deceased has left to his children,
there is still a Mitzvah on the inheritors to repay the debtors to fulfill
the Mitzvah of Kibbud Av V'eym. This is because it is unbecoming for a
person to have a reputation of someone who does not pay his debts, even
after death. However, if the father did not leave any money as an
inheritance, the children are exempt from paying his debts, since the
Mitzvah of Kibbud Av V'Eym is at the expense of the parent, as is
discussed in the Shulchan Oruch (Yoreh De'ah 245:5).
The Nesivos Mishpat there (1) elaborates on this even more and says that
although the Shulchan Oruch does say that the heirs have a Mitzvah to pay
the parent's loans, the money that they have inherited belongs to them and
not to the debtors until they choose to pay for their parent's debts.
Therefore, if one of the creditors would confiscate part of the estate as
payment for money owed him, Bais Din would be obligated to force him to
return what he has taken from the heirs, if the heirs would decide that
they are not interested in paying the parent's debts.
According to the above, it is clear that the school administration had no
right to withhold Reuven's salary to repay the tuition debt of the
parents. Although his parents are still obligated to pay for the services
provided by the school many years ago for their child, the child is not
required to discharge the debt for them. The school had no intention at
all of claiming the tuition from Reuven, at the time that the education
was provided. Therefore Reuven has the right to demand the salary that
the school withheld from him, and if necessary, he may take the school to
Bais Din to force the return of his money.
As we stated above, the Shulchan Oruch (Yoreh De'ah 245:5) states that the
Mitzvah of Kibbud Av V'Eym comes at the expense of the parent. If the
parent's have no money of their own, a child is not obligated to support
them using money of his own. However, because of the Mitzvah of Tzedakah
(Charity) a child is required, and may be forced by a Bais Din, to support
his impoverished parents to the best of his ability. If the child himself
is unable to support them, any money that he may have designated as
Ma'aser money should be used to support his parents. See there for more
details of this Mitzvah.
Although the Halacha that a child is forced to support his parents, only
applies to necessities such as housing, food, and clothing, and does not
apply to paying the parent's debts, it seems logical that if he would
voluntarily do so and clear his parent's name, this would definitely be
fulfillment of the Mitzvah of Kibbud Av V'Eym, as the S'ma quoted above,
has explained. Also, the Shulchan Oruch and the Rema (Yoreh De'ah 253:12)
state that it is permitted to use charity funds to pay off the debts of an
Therefore, practically speaking, if Reuven is not interested in paying off
his parent's debt, the school is obligated to pay him his full salary.
However, it would be proper for him to voluntarily pay off their debts and
clear their name, thus performing the Mitzvah of Kibbutz Av V'Eym. As we
stated above in Answer D, if he has siblings, the total debt should be
divided either equally between them, or in a manner proportionate to their
wealth, as is discussed by the Rema in Yoreh De'ah 245:5.
This week's class is based on a column by Rabbi Tzvi Shpitz, who is an
Av Bet Din and Rosh Kollel in the Ramot neighborhood of Jerusalem. His
column originally appears in Hebrew in Toda'ah, a weekly publication in
Jerusalem. It has been translated and reprinted here with his
permission and approval.
This class is translated and moderated by Rabbi Aaron Tendler of Yeshivas
Ner Yisroel in Baltimore. Rabbi Tendler accepts full responsibility for
the accuracy of the translation and will be happy to fax originals of the
articles in Hebrew to anyone interested.
We hope you find this class informative and stimulating! If you do not see a subscription form to the left
of the screen, access the Advanced Learning Network to
subscribe to Business-Halacha.
For information on subscriptions, archives, and other Project Genesis
classes, send mail to email@example.com for an automated reply. For
subscription assistance, send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Please Note: The purpose of this column is to make people aware of Choshen Mishpat
situations that can arise at any time, and the Halachic concepts that may be used to resolve them. Each
individual situation must be resolved by an objective, competent Bais Din (or Rabbinic Arbitrator) in the
presence of all parties involved!