Hilchos Choshen Mishpat
Volume I : Number 31
Reuven brought his car into a body shop to be repaired, after it was in
a minor accident. Once it was there, the owner of the body shop decided
on his own to do some other repair work that was not related to this
accident, and was not covered under Reuven's insurance policy, and filed
one claim for the entire job.
Is Reuven obligated to reimburse the insurance company for the excess
money that they paid to repair the damage that was not covered under his
In the event that the owner refuses to repay the insurance company,
Reuven would be obligated to pay, but only the amount that he actually
benefitted from the additional repair work.
- It is absolutely forbidden for a car owner or body shop to file a
claim for repair of damages that are not included under the owner's
Similarly, it is absolutely forbidden to file a claim for damage or theft
to a car that was not actually covered at the time that it happened. For
example, if a person driving the car at the time of the accident had
rented it from the owner, and this is against the terms of his insurance
policy, or if someone who did not have a valid drivers license was
driving it, or the driver had a learners permit but was not accompanied
properly, a claim may not be filed. Additionally, if a policy states that
the car must have a working alarm and it doesn't, or that the owner must
lock the car to be covered for theft and he does not, no claim may be
Anyone who collects on a claim in any of the above situations is a thief,
and is obligated to return any money collected to the insurance company.
- In any of the above situations, it makes no difference if the
insurance company is owned (wholly or partially) by Jew or non-Jew. It is
also forbidden to collect even if the insurance agent cooperates in
filing the false claim, and if collected the payment must be returned.
- Regarding our question, the owner of the body shop is obligated to
return the money received illegally to repair the extra damage not
covered in the policy.
For example, if it was an older car, and with or without the additional
repair Reuven would receive the same amount if he would want to sell the
car, he would not be obligated to pay the insurance company at all.
However, if the resale value of the car went up $500 because of the
additional repair, even if the body shop was paid an additional $2000 for
the repair, Reuven must only pay $500.
Similarly, if the insurance company paid the body shop $2000 for this
repair, even if this is the actual amount that the resale value went up
because of this, but Reuven could have found another body shop that would
have done the same repair for him for $500, he is only obligated to
reimburse the insurance company $500.
The Halachos of theft are stated clearly in the Torah and are elaborated
on in the Rambam, and in the Shulchan Oruch (Choshen Mishpat 348 etc.) It
is also stated clearly in Choshen Mishpat 348:1 and 359:1 that the
prohibition to steal according to the Torah applies equally to Jew and
non-Jew. The Shach there (3) states that our situation is considered
theft according to all opinions.
Regarding our question, the following issues must be addressed. On the
one hand, Reuven did not request that the body shop do the additional
repairs. On the other hand, because of the body shop owner's actions, a
false claim was filed on Reuven's behalf, and Reuven did receive from the
insurance company the benefit of an increase in the value of his car. In
this situation, Reuven is only obligated to pay the amount that he would
have had to pay to receive this additional benefit. This is the Halacha
that we find in Bava Metzia 101a regarding a gardener who enters someone
else's field without permission and plants and otherwise improves the
field, that the owner is only obligated to pay the actual amount that he
has benefitted, and not the gardener's total fee.
Feedback is appreciated! It can be sent firstname.lastname@example.org.
This week's class is based on a column by Rabbi Tzvi Shpitz, who is an Av
Bais Din and Rosh Kollel in the Ramot neighborhood of Jerusalem. His
Column originally appears in Hebrew in Toda'ah, a weekly publication in
Jerusalem. It has been translated and reprinted here with his permission
We hope you find this class informative and stimulating! If you do not see a subscription form to the left
of the screen, access the Advanced Learning Network to
subscribe to Business-Halacha.
For information on subscriptions, archives, and other Project Genesis
classes, send mail to email@example.com for an automated reply. For
subscription assistance, send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Please Note: The purpose of this column is to make people aware of Choshen Mishpat
situations that can arise at any time, and the Halachic concepts that may be used to resolve them. Each
individual situation must be resolved by an objective, competent Bais Din (or Rabbinic Arbitrator) in the
presence of all parties involved!
Rabbi Yissocher Frand - 5759
Why was Balak Worried?
Rabbi Yaakov Menken - 5757
Ph.D. in Morals
Rabbi Berel Wein - 5761
Tents Where Torah is Studied
Shlomo Katz - 5767
Rabbi Raymond Beyda - 5766
Storm On The Horizon
Rabbi Pinchas Winston - 5761
Rabbi Dovid Green - 5757
If It Can Happen To Bilaam, It Can Happen to Any of Us
Rabbi Yissocher Frand - 5775
Our Achilles' Heel
Rabbi Berel Wein - 5764
Rabbi Yaakov Menken - 5762
You Can't Pick Your Cards...
Rabbi Yisroel Ciner - 5757
Bilam: A Perfect Tzadik?
Shlomo Katz - 5761
Rabbi Yisroel Ciner - 5760
Rabbi Aron Tendler - 5762
The Good Tents
Rabbi Yaakov Menken - 5761
Rabbi Pinchas Winston - 5759