| |
Hilchos Choshen Mishpat
Volume I : Number 33
Purchasing Stolen Goods
Question:
Is it permitted to purchase items from a pawn shop that is suspected of
being a front for stolen goods? If you are approached on a street corner
and are offered the option of purchasing items at a very low price, are
you allowed to do so?
Answer:
-
It is forbidden to assist a thief in any way, whether in the actual
act of stealing, transporting the stolen item, or helping to dispose of
it. (Of course, it is permitted to help him transport it to return it to
the original owner.)
Therefore, it is forbidden to purchase an item that is known to be
stolen, or even an item that was probably stolen.
We should therefore refrain from purchasing items on street corners, or
at pawn shops that have a shady reputation. We should also be aware that
if the price is too good to be true, the item being sold may have been
stolen, and should be checked out.
We should especially be careful when purchasing Tashmishei Kedusha, i.e.
Sifrei Torah (Torah Scrolls), Tefillen, Mezuzos, and Seforim, even if
new, to buy only from reputable people and not from someone unknown, even
if he seems to have a valid story as to how he ended up with these items.
- Despite all of the above, if an item has already been purchased at one
of the above mentioned places, the probability is that the original owner
has given up hope of ever seeing it again. Therefore, the sale is
effective and the article belongs to the buyer.
Sources:
The Halacha that it is forbidden to purchase a stolen article from a
thief is stated in Bava Kama 118b-119a, Kiddushin 56b, and is brought
down in the Rambam in Hilchos Geneivah (5:1-3) and in the Shulchan Oruch,
Choshen Mishpat (356:1). The explanation given is that anyone who assists
a thief is strengthening the hand of sinners, and is encouraging the
thief to continue to steal. Our Rabbis have an expression for this -
"It's not the rat that steals, it's the hole that steals". In other
words, if the rat (aka the thief) would know that he wouldn't have a hole
to conceal what he steals from others, he wouldn't steal. In our
situation, the one who purchases from the thief is the "hole". This also
applies to any other assistance that one might give a thief to aid him to
be successful in his trade.
The Rivash in his Teshuvos (Ch. 108) says that the prohibition to assist
a thief applies even if the buyer is uncertain that the object was stolen,
but there are indications that it was (Raglayim L'Davar). For example, if
the price is very low for no apparent reason, there is no warranty, or the
seller clearly wants to get rid of the item as quickly as possible. The
statement of the Rivash is mentioned in the Taz in Choshen Mishpat 356:1.
In the Shulchan Oruch, Choshen Mishpat (353:3), it says that if someone
were to buy a stolen object from the thief after the owner has given up
hope of ever receiving it again, the buyer acquires the object
Halachically. This is because we have a combination of the original owner
giving up hope (Yiyush) and the buyer transferring the object into his
domain (Shinui Reshus).
Therefore, objects that were confiscated by the government, even if it
was determined that they were taken for reasons that aren't Halachically
valid (an example of this would be if it was taken as a lien on a
blatantly unfair tax), or lost items that have been turned over to the
police and are now being sold because no owner has stepped forward to
claim them, although we should not assist them in the sale of the items,
if a long time has elapsed from the time of the confiscation, they may be
purchased. This is because the original owners have given up hope of ever
getting their articles returned, and we have a situation of Yiyush and
Shinui Reshus. Purchasing this item (in the case of improper confiscation)
cannot be considered "providing a hole for the rat", since they would be
confiscated whether there are buyers or not.
Feedback is appreciated! It can be sent toatendler@torah.org.
This week's class is based on a column by Rabbi Tzvi Shpitz, who is an Av
Bais Din and Rosh Kollel in the Ramot neighborhood of Jerusalem. His
Column originally appears in Hebrew in Toda'ah, a weekly publication in
Jerusalem. It has been translated and reprinted here with his permission
and approval.
We hope you find this class informative and stimulating! If you do not see a subscription form to the left
of the screen, access the Advanced Learning Network to
subscribe to Business-Halacha.
For information on subscriptions, archives, and other Project Genesis
classes, send mail to learn@torah.org for an automated reply. For
subscription assistance, send mail to gabbai@torah.org.
Please Note: The purpose of this column is to make people aware of Choshen Mishpat
situations that can arise at any time, and the Halachic concepts that may be used to resolve them. Each
individual situation must be resolved by an objective, competent Bais Din (or Rabbinic Arbitrator) in the
presence of all parties involved!
|
|
|
 |
|

ARTICLES ON
BALAK:
Bilaam's Obsession Rabbi Yaakov Menken - 5762
Die Like a Jew Rabbi Raymond Beyda - 5767
Putting the Cart Before the Horse Rabbi Pinchas Avruch - 5763
 Donkey Talk Rabbi Yisroel Ciner - 5759
Prophet Motive Rabbi Label Lam - 5761
Why was Balak Worried? Rabbi Yaakov Menken - 5757
 Storm On The Horizon Rabbi Pinchas Winston - 5761
'Kill' Yourself for Torah Rabbi Yaakov Menken - 5760
Reflecting on G-d Rabbi Moshe Peretz Gilden - 5762
Found In Contempt Rabbi Label Lam - 5764
Jewish Dwellings Rabbi Yisroel Ciner - 5760
Forever a Donkey Rabbi Naftali Reich - 5767
Those Who Will Not See Rabbi Yissocher Frand - 5763
A Local Call Rabbi Pinchas Winston - 5767
Three Festivals: The Holy Journey Rabbi Osher Chaim Levene - 5767
Why Didn't Moshe Enter Canaan? Shlomo Katz - 5759

|
|