Torah.org Home Subscribe Services Support Us
 
Print Version

Email this article to a friend

Parshas Beshalach

When Pharaoh and his army were in hot pursuit the Bnei Yisroel cried out (vayitz'aku) to Hashem. (14:10). Immediately afterward (14:11-12) they told Moshe how upset they were that he took them out of Egypt and that it would have been preferable to remain in Egypt rather than die in the desert.

Onkeles translates vayitz'aku in the sense of crying out with a complaint (see Ramban). According to Onkeles the flow of the psukim is understandable. First they complained to Hashem, then they turned to Moshe.

Rashi, however, translates vayitz'aku in the sense of crying out in prayer, meaning that they davened. Rashi, quoting the Mechilta, says this was an adoption of the behavior of their forefathers who instituted davening.

According to Rashi, (i) how are we to understand the flow of the psukim - if they were davening presumably they were not complaining to Hashem, so why would they turn to complain to Moshe, and (ii) why does Rashi tell us that they adopted the behavior of their forefathers; Rashi could just say simply that vayitz'aku means they davened - what compels Rashi to describe the source of davening at this juncture?

[Ba'er Haytev explains that they first davened, but, when feeling that their prayers were unanswered, they turned against Moshe. The Ramban explains that there were different groups within the Jewish people - some, a minority, went to daven sincerely, others went to complain. These explanations would answer the first question but not the second.]

The Maharal (in Gur Aryeh) gives an ingenious (and timelessly relevant) explanation. Rashi is bothered by the first question of how to reconcile the flow of the psukim; how does davening lead to complaining. By saying that they adopted the davening behavior of their forefathers (instead of simply saying that vayitz'aku means they davened) Rashi is explaining that their prayers were not sincere; they davened because it was a family custom to do so, but they did not have kavana or really believe in the power of their davening. So first they davened (without kavana) because that was their (mindless) custom, then they turned against Moshe, which was their true agenda.


Gal Einai, Copyright 2006 by Gedalia Litke and Torah.org


 

ARTICLES ON KI SISA AND PURIM:

View Complete List

From Calf to Cow
Rabbi Pinchas Winston - 5759

How Powerful I Can Be
Rabbi Label Lam - 5769

Moshe's Finest Moment
Rabbi Yissocher Frand - 5761

Frumster - Orthodox Jewish Dating

Remembering Amalek
Rabbi Yaakov Menken - 5762

The Golden Thread of Our Existence
Rabbi Label Lam - 5767

Defending the Indefensible
Rabbi Eliyahu Hoffmann - 5763

Looking for a Chavrusah?

They Have Strayed QUICKLY
Rabbi Yissocher Frand - 5768

Terrorist Threat
Rabbi Raymond Beyda - 5766

The Vulnerabilty of Emotional Doubt
Rabbi Pinchas Winston - 5773

> Deadly Compromises
Rabbi Yaakov Menken - 5757

Of Prayer and Sleep
Rabbi Yehudah Prero - 5758

Freedom of Religion
Rabbi Dovid Green - 5760

ArtScroll

Fear of What?
Rabbi Label Lam - 5766

Guidance Needed
Rabbi Berel Wein - 5764

Oh No! Not DeNILE Again!
Rabbi Pinchas Winston - 5766

Two Types of Shabbat
Shlomo Katz - 5763



Project Genesis

Torah.org Home


Torah Portion

Jewish Law

Ethics

Texts

Learn the Basics

Seasons

Features

TORAHAUDIO

Ask The Rabbi

Knowledge Base




Help

About Us

Contact Us



Free Book on Geulah!




Torah.org Home
Torah.org HomeCapalon.com Copyright Information