Torah.org Home Subscribe Services Support Us
 
Print Version

Email this article to a friend

Parshas Beshalach

When Pharaoh and his army were in hot pursuit the Bnei Yisroel cried out (vayitz'aku) to Hashem. (14:10). Immediately afterward (14:11-12) they told Moshe how upset they were that he took them out of Egypt and that it would have been preferable to remain in Egypt rather than die in the desert.

Onkeles translates vayitz'aku in the sense of crying out with a complaint (see Ramban). According to Onkeles the flow of the psukim is understandable. First they complained to Hashem, then they turned to Moshe.

Rashi, however, translates vayitz'aku in the sense of crying out in prayer, meaning that they davened. Rashi, quoting the Mechilta, says this was an adoption of the behavior of their forefathers who instituted davening.

According to Rashi, (i) how are we to understand the flow of the psukim - if they were davening presumably they were not complaining to Hashem, so why would they turn to complain to Moshe, and (ii) why does Rashi tell us that they adopted the behavior of their forefathers; Rashi could just say simply that vayitz'aku means they davened - what compels Rashi to describe the source of davening at this juncture?

[Ba'er Haytev explains that they first davened, but, when feeling that their prayers were unanswered, they turned against Moshe. The Ramban explains that there were different groups within the Jewish people - some, a minority, went to daven sincerely, others went to complain. These explanations would answer the first question but not the second.]

The Maharal (in Gur Aryeh) gives an ingenious (and timelessly relevant) explanation. Rashi is bothered by the first question of how to reconcile the flow of the psukim; how does davening lead to complaining. By saying that they adopted the davening behavior of their forefathers (instead of simply saying that vayitz'aku means they davened) Rashi is explaining that their prayers were not sincere; they davened because it was a family custom to do so, but they did not have kavana or really believe in the power of their davening. So first they davened (without kavana) because that was their (mindless) custom, then they turned against Moshe, which was their true agenda.


Gal Einai, Copyright 2006 by Gedalia Litke and Torah.org


 

ARTICLES ON BALAK AND THE THREE WEEKS:

View Complete List

About This We Cry!
Rabbi Label Lam - 5766

Only the Shadow Knows
Rabbi Aron Tendler - 5764

The Uncursables
Shlomo Katz - 5766

Frumster - Orthodox Jewish Dating

Mixed Multitude of Troubles
Rabbi Pinchas Winston - 5760

Harnessing Powers
Rabbi Yehudah Prero - 5761

The Parah Paradox
Rabbi Yissocher Frand - 5756

> Bilaam's Killing Kindness
Rabbi Berel Wein - 5772

Only A True Magician Succeeds
Rabbi Pinchas Winston - 5771

If It Can Happen To Bilaam, It Can Happen to Any of Us
Rabbi Yissocher Frand - 5775

Looking for a Chavrusah?

All Pain, No Gain
Rabbi Mordechai Kamenetzky - 5760

Moshe's Book and Bilam's Book
Shlomo Katz - 5763

Behold! A Nation
Rabbi Eliyahu Hoffmann - 5758

ArtScroll

What Are We Missing On Tisha B'Av?
Rabbi Label Lam - 5764

Working on the Outside
Rabbi Aron Tendler - 5760

Timepiece
Rabbi Raymond Beyda - 5763

The Segulot of Mitzvot
Shlomo Katz - 5772



Project Genesis

Torah.org Home


Torah Portion

Jewish Law

Ethics

Texts

Learn the Basics

Seasons

Features

TORAHAUDIO

Ask The Rabbi

Knowledge Base




Help

About Us

Contact Us



Free Book on Geulah!




Torah.org Home
Torah.org HomeCapalon.com Copyright Information