Torah.org Home Subscribe Services Support Us
 
Print Version

Email this article to a friend

Parshas Korach

The machlokes (dispute) instigated by Korach was not for the sake of Heaven and therefore is not everlasting, while the Talmudic disputes between Hillel and Shamai were for the sake of Heaven and therefore are everlasting. (Pirkei Avos 5:20) This is counter-intuitive. We always appreciate peace and harmony, so wouldn't we expect a 'good' dispute to eventually dissipate while it would be the 'bad' dispute that lasts forever?

Korach's reputation is deeply associated with machlokes. Nonetheless, his proposal was that everyone is equal and that there was therefore no need for Moshe's leadership. In a sense, then, he was against having chilukim/differences and he favored equality, so why is he viewed as the ultimate in machlokes/divisiveness?

There is a fundamental distinction between shalom/peace, on the one hand, and equality/no differences, on the other.

Shalom does not mean we are the same; in fact it means that we recognize that we are different from one another and that each of us has a unique role to play in serving the larger cause of Klal Yisroel's mission in this world.

For example, shalom bayis (domestic tranquility) doesn't mean that the two individuals are exactly alike and therefore get along; rather it means that in spite of their very different natures they work harmoniously together in pursuing common goals. The peacefulness lies in accepting the differences and agreeing to work side-by-side toward the common goal. Similarly, Rashi says that the plague of hail was comprised of fire and water and that, in order to serve their Creator, the two opposing elements made peace. (Parshas Vo'era 9:24)

Conversely, machlokes means refusing to recognize that different people have different roles as a result of their unique and innate talents and characteristics; I want everyone to be the same even though really we're not. This is, of course, folly. And anyone who asserts that there are no differences between us (and that therefore there should be no separation of roles) is necessarily carrying an agenda - logically it otherwise makes no sense to blatantly ignore obvious differences. In Korach's case this agenda was his own jealousy of the position of Kohen Gadol (High Priest) which he coveted.

[This is based on a shiur of HoRav Yochanan Zweig, Shlita.]


Gal Einai, Copyright © 2006 by Gedalia Litke and Torah.org

Please Support TORAH.ORG
Print Version       Email this article to a friend

 

ARTICLES ON NASO AND SHAVUOS:

View Complete List

Raising Sinai
Rabbi Mordechai Kamenetzky - 5757

Too Much "Ish"
Rabbi Yissocher Frand - 5763

The Preface to the Story of the Moshiach
Rabbi Yissocher Frand - 5766

> A Mystical Idea May Help Us Understand the Incomprehensible
Rabbi Yissocher Frand - 5772

Possessive Nouns
Rabbi Mordechai Kamenetzky - 5760

Rashi and the Four Minute Mile
Rabbi Dovid Green - 5759

Frumster - Orthodox Jewish Dating

The Torah's Safeguards
Rabbi Berel Wein - 5771

Just for You!
Rabbi Label Lam - 5772

Seeing the Bigger Picture
Rabbi Eliyahu Hoffmann - 5763

Looking for a Chavrusah?

NU!?
Rabbi Label Lam - 5769

Levi Genes
Rabbi Berel Wein - 5766

Our Source of Honor
Rabbi Moshe Peretz Gilden - 5763

ArtScroll

Limiting the Wine
Rabbi Aron Tendler - 5761

Domestic Harmony and National Peace
Rabbi Yissocher Frand - 5755

What We See is What We Get
Rabbi Yehudah Prero - 5758

Take a Deep Breath
Rabbi Eliyahu Hoffmann - 5762



Project Genesis

Torah.org Home


Torah Portion

Jewish Law

Ethics

Texts

Learn the Basics

Seasons

Features

TORAHAUDIO

Ask The Rabbi

Knowledge Base




Help

About Us

Contact Us



Free Book on Geulah!




Torah.org Home
Torah.org HomeCapalon.com Copyright Information