Torah.org Home Subscribe Services Support Us
 
Print Version

Email this article to a friend

Parshas Korach

The machlokes (dispute) instigated by Korach was not for the sake of Heaven and therefore is not everlasting, while the Talmudic disputes between Hillel and Shamai were for the sake of Heaven and therefore are everlasting. (Pirkei Avos 5:20) This is counter-intuitive. We always appreciate peace and harmony, so wouldn't we expect a 'good' dispute to eventually dissipate while it would be the 'bad' dispute that lasts forever?

Korach's reputation is deeply associated with machlokes. Nonetheless, his proposal was that everyone is equal and that there was therefore no need for Moshe's leadership. In a sense, then, he was against having chilukim/differences and he favored equality, so why is he viewed as the ultimate in machlokes/divisiveness?

There is a fundamental distinction between shalom/peace, on the one hand, and equality/no differences, on the other.

Shalom does not mean we are the same; in fact it means that we recognize that we are different from one another and that each of us has a unique role to play in serving the larger cause of Klal Yisroel's mission in this world.

For example, shalom bayis (domestic tranquility) doesn't mean that the two individuals are exactly alike and therefore get along; rather it means that in spite of their very different natures they work harmoniously together in pursuing common goals. The peacefulness lies in accepting the differences and agreeing to work side-by-side toward the common goal. Similarly, Rashi says that the plague of hail was comprised of fire and water and that, in order to serve their Creator, the two opposing elements made peace. (Parshas Vo'era 9:24)

Conversely, machlokes means refusing to recognize that different people have different roles as a result of their unique and innate talents and characteristics; I want everyone to be the same even though really we're not. This is, of course, folly. And anyone who asserts that there are no differences between us (and that therefore there should be no separation of roles) is necessarily carrying an agenda - logically it otherwise makes no sense to blatantly ignore obvious differences. In Korach's case this agenda was his own jealousy of the position of Kohen Gadol (High Priest) which he coveted.

[This is based on a shiur of HoRav Yochanan Zweig, Shlita.]


Gal Einai, Copyright © 2006 by Gedalia Litke and Torah.org

Please Support TORAH.ORG
Print Version       Email this article to a friend

 

ARTICLES ON SHOFTIM AND ELUL / ROSH HASHANAH:

View Complete List

The Law and Beyond
Shlomo Katz - 5765

The Custom of Eating Symbolic Foods
Rabbi Yehudah Prero - 5755

Doctors and Pilots
Rabbi Naftali Reich - 5766

The Everything Torah Book

Melech: The King and I
Rabbi Osher Chaim Levene - 5766

The Time Is Now
Rabbi Yaakov Menken - 5759

Combating Corruption
Rabbi Berel Wein - 5766

ArtScroll

Satisfaction Can Bring Him Back
Rabbi Label Lam - 5768

Lessons from a Farewell Speech
Rabbi Yehudah Prero - 5760

Teshuva—Paradigm Shift
Rabbi Eliyahu Hoffmann - 5765

Email Sponsorship

First in the Mind!
Rabbi Label Lam - 5763

A Costly Yud
Rabbi Eliyahu Hoffmann - 5763

Challenged in the Heat of Battle
Rabbi Pinchas Avruch - 5761

Starting From Scratch
Rabbi Pinchas Avruch - 5764

You'll be the Judge of That
Rabbi Pinchas Winston - 5765

In All Fairness
Rabbi Aron Tendler - 5760

Blinding Bribery
Rabbi Yaakov Menken - 5756


Learning Events and Programs

Project Genesis

Torah.org Home


Torah Portion

Jewish Law

Ethics

Texts

Learn the Basics

Seasons

Features

TORAHAUDIO

Ask The Rabbi

Knowledge Base

Discussion Forum




Help

About Us

Contact Us


Enable popup menus


Download to my HandHeld


Torah.org Home
Torah.org HomeCapalon.com Copyright Information