Torah.org Home Subscribe Services Support Us
 
Print Version

Email this article to a friend

Parshas Korach

The machlokes (dispute) instigated by Korach was not for the sake of Heaven and therefore is not everlasting, while the Talmudic disputes between Hillel and Shamai were for the sake of Heaven and therefore are everlasting. (Pirkei Avos 5:20) This is counter-intuitive. We always appreciate peace and harmony, so wouldn't we expect a 'good' dispute to eventually dissipate while it would be the 'bad' dispute that lasts forever?

Korach's reputation is deeply associated with machlokes. Nonetheless, his proposal was that everyone is equal and that there was therefore no need for Moshe's leadership. In a sense, then, he was against having chilukim/differences and he favored equality, so why is he viewed as the ultimate in machlokes/divisiveness?

There is a fundamental distinction between shalom/peace, on the one hand, and equality/no differences, on the other.

Shalom does not mean we are the same; in fact it means that we recognize that we are different from one another and that each of us has a unique role to play in serving the larger cause of Klal Yisroel's mission in this world.

For example, shalom bayis (domestic tranquility) doesn't mean that the two individuals are exactly alike and therefore get along; rather it means that in spite of their very different natures they work harmoniously together in pursuing common goals. The peacefulness lies in accepting the differences and agreeing to work side-by-side toward the common goal. Similarly, Rashi says that the plague of hail was comprised of fire and water and that, in order to serve their Creator, the two opposing elements made peace. (Parshas Vo'era 9:24)

Conversely, machlokes means refusing to recognize that different people have different roles as a result of their unique and innate talents and characteristics; I want everyone to be the same even though really we're not. This is, of course, folly. And anyone who asserts that there are no differences between us (and that therefore there should be no separation of roles) is necessarily carrying an agenda - logically it otherwise makes no sense to blatantly ignore obvious differences. In Korach's case this agenda was his own jealousy of the position of Kohen Gadol (High Priest) which he coveted.

[This is based on a shiur of HoRav Yochanan Zweig, Shlita.]


Gal Einai, Copyright © 2006 by Gedalia Litke and Torah.org

Please Support TORAH.ORG
Print Version       Email this article to a friend

 

ARTICLES ON MISHPATIM:

View Complete List

A Holy Man
Rabbi Label Lam - 5768

The Battle Plan
Rabbi Pinchas Avruch - 5764

Swimming Against the Current
Rabbi Moshe Peretz Gilden - 5762

> The Meat of the Meeting
Rabbi Yisroel Ciner - 5758

The Needy do More for the Rich than Vice Versa
Rabbi Yissocher Frand - 5771

Make Yourself- at Home
Rabbi Label Lam - 5767

> Learning from the Enemy—It’s a Steal!
Rabbi Eliyahu Hoffmann - 5766

Swapping Places with the Poor
Rabbi Eliyahu Hoffmann - 5764

Another Time - Another Place
Rabbi Eliyahu Hoffmann - 5761

Frumster - Orthodox Jewish Dating

Jewish Law in Society Today
Rabbi Berel Wein - 5770

When Majority Doesn't Rule
Rabbi Yaakov Menken - 5758

It's His Call
Rabbi Raymond Beyda - 5764

Why? Because I'm Your Father - That's Why!
Shlomo Katz - 5766

Help the Donkey
Rabbi Dovid Green - 5757

Murder and the Super Bowl
Rabbi Yisroel Ciner - 5759

Values We Can Trust
Rabbi Aron Tendler - 5759



Project Genesis

Torah.org Home


Torah Portion

Jewish Law

Ethics

Texts

Learn the Basics

Seasons

Features

TORAHAUDIO

Ask The Rabbi

Knowledge Base




Help

About Us

Contact Us



Free Book on Geulah!




Torah.org Home
Torah.org HomeCapalon.com Copyright Information