Torah.org Home Subscribe Services Support Us
 
Print Version

Email this article to a friend

Parshas Miketz

During the famine Yaakov tells his sons to go down from Eretz Yisroel to Egypt to buy food. 42:2. "R'du shama v'shivru lanu misham - go down there and buy food for us from there". Rashi says that Yaakov didn't say "l'chu - go", rather he said "r'du-go down"; and the reason for this is that the 210 gematria of r'du functions as a hint to the 210 years of enslavement in Egypt.

There are numerous examples of Rashi explaining elsewhere that Eretz Yisroel is on a higher plane than all other lands and that therefore it is apporpriate to speak of going up to or down from Eretz Yisroel.

If so, why isn't r'du appropriate for this pasuk where the instrcution is to go down from Eretz Yisroel? On the strength of this diffuculty many m'forshei Rashi delete the first clause from this Rashi. According to them Rashi is saying simply, without pointing out anything curious about the terminology, that the 210 r'du equals the 210 years. If we follow these m'forshim and delete the clause, however, we still must explain how Yaakov's use of r'du hints at anything deeper - it would only be a hint if the terminology would be somewhat unusual or unexpected - if it is exactly what we expect to hear then how can a deeper, alternative meaning be discerned?

Rashi's dibur hamatchil, his quote from the pasuk that he uses as the starting point for his comment, is an integral part of his commentary. In this case, a careful reading of the dibur hamatchil reveals the answer to the question above. Rashi's dibur hamatchil is "r'du shama - go down there"; if Rashi wanted to tell us about the r'du=210 connection the dibur hamatchil could have been simply "r'du" - why "r'du shama"?

Rashi's real issue in this pasuk is that it says both shama and misham - "Go down THERE and buy us food from THERE". By Rashi using the two word dibur hamatchil he is indicating his concern over the word shama. Rashi's question is why is it neccesary. His answer is that it is repeated so that there will be a two word hint to the length of the enslavement - r'du shama - there you will be 210. R'du is the right word to use, but by adding a redundant shama the pasuk is hinting at the 210 years. (See Maskil L'Dovid and other m'forshei Rashi.)

[According to those who retain the first clause in this Rashi, and Rashi is expressing a clearly stated question about the terminology (but not about the redundancy of sham/misham), it is useful to note as a general matter that whenever Rashi articluates his question you can be pretty sure that the real issue he is addressing, as always, remains unarticulated - see Maskil L'Dovid.]


Gal Einai, Copyright 2006 by Gedalia Litke and Torah.org


 






ARTICLES ON MASEI AND THE THREE WEEKS:

View Complete List

Kamtza and Bar-Kamtza
Rabbi Yisroel Ciner - 5758

Wandering No More
Rabbi Aron Tendler - 5760

I Told You So
Rabbi Pinchas Winston - 5772

Frumster - Orthodox Jewish Dating

The Eye Generation
Rabbi Pinchas Winston - 5763

Unquestioned Answers
Rabbi Mordechai Kamenetzky - 5761

Ramban: Why was Parshas Nedarim given over specifically to "Roshei haMatos?"
- 5771

Looking for a Chavrusah?

A Future Built on the Past
Rabbi Yaakov Menken - 5759

Connectivity
Rabbi Raymond Beyda - 5767

Rebuilding the Temple
Rabbi Pinchas Winston - 5768

> Body Language
Rabbi Yochanan Zweig - 5770

What Are We Mourning on the Ninth of Av
Rabbi Yosef Kalatzky - 5765

When Moshiach Comes
Rabbi Label Lam - 5768

ArtScroll

From the Depths of Your Heart
Rabbi Chaim Flom - 5767

Faithful Contentment
Rabbi Naphtali Hoff - 5774

More Generous Thoughts
Rabbi Label Lam - 5764

An Oath
Rabbi Pinchas Winston - 5769



Project Genesis

Torah.org Home


Torah Portion

Jewish Law

Ethics

Texts

Learn the Basics

Seasons

Features

TORAHAUDIO

Ask The Rabbi

Knowledge Base




Help

About Us

Contact Us



Free Book on Geulah!




Torah.org Home
Torah.org HomeCapalon.com Copyright Information