Torah.org Home Subscribe Services Support Us
 
Print Version

Email this article to a friend

Parshas Pinchas

Rashi notes (27:1) that in the last pasuk of Parshas Mas'ei the Bnos (daughters of) Tzlofchad are listed in a different order than their listing in our Parsha, and that this teaches us that they were 'shkulos zu ka'zu' - equal to one another. See also Rashi in Parshas Mas'ei where Rashi further explains that the listings in Parshas Pinchos follow the order of their wisdom whereas the listing in Parshas Mas'ei follows their age.

It is interesting that Rashi makes a similar comment in Parshas Vo'era regarding an unusual instance where Aharon is listed before Moshe. Rashi's comment there (6:26) is that this teaches us that Moshe and Aharon are 'shkulos k'echad' - equal as one.

Why does Rashi distinguish slightly between the Bnos Tzlofchad (equal 'to one another') and Aharon and Moshe (equal 'as one')? Also, how can it be said that Bnos Tzlofchad were equal if they had different levels of wisdom? (This last question assumes that the Parshas Mas'ei comment of Rashi - that the Bnos Tzlofchad are listed in Parshas Pinchas according to their wisdom - is intended by Rashi to be consistent with the shkulos/equality explanation.)

The M'forshei Rashi seem to assume that these two instances of shkulos/equality - 'to one another' and 'as one' - are intended by Rashi to be perfectly parallel (see, for example, Be'er BaSadeh and Maskil L'Dovid on the last Rashi in Parshas Mas'ei) and that there is no intended distinction inherent in the slightly different versions Rashi articulates.

Nonetheless, perhaps an intended distinction might be that unlike Moshe and Aharon who really were equals (at least at that point) and can be said to be 'as one', the Bnos Tzlofchad in fact were not equals. Rather, they treated each other as equals and behaved toward one another as equals, each giving respect to the other - shkulos zu ka'zu. If correct, this would answer the questions above and also neatly explain why we even need to know that they were 'equals'. Unlike some others who had previously come with complaints to Moshe and were rebuffed, Bnos Tzlofchad came with a complaint and their issue was fully embraced. The Torah is hinting, and Rashi is noting the hint, that this is because they had internal respect for one another and it was therefore (correctly) assumed that they were being sincere and 'agenda-free' in making their request.


Gal Einai, Copyright 2006 by Gedalia Litke and Torah.org


 


ARTICLES ON MIKETZ AND CHANUKAH:

View Complete List

A New Perspective
Shlomo Katz - 5768

Analyzing The Imagery of A Familiar Chanukah Poem
Rabbi Yissocher Frand - 5765

Outstanding Credit Wine
Rabbi Eliyahu Hoffmann - 5761

ArtScroll

Thanks for What?
Shlomo Katz - 5774

A Higher Calling
Rabbi Mordechai Kamenetzky - 5759

The Ideal Answer, or the Answer of Ideals
Rabbi Dovid Green - 5759

Looking for a Chavrusah?

Natural Miracles
Rabbi Yehudah Prero - 5766

Don't Forget the Butler
Shlomo Katz - 5758

Chanukah, Chutzpah, and Coming Close to G-d
Rabbi Yehudah Prero - 5757

> "Your Servant, Our Father"
Rabbi Yissocher Frand - 5775

Sing His Praises
Rabbi Yisroel Ciner - 5761

Living In Exile
Rabbi Pinchas Winston - 5770

Frumster - Orthodox Jewish Dating

A Spiritual Holiday
Rabbi Yehudah Prero - 5755

'Mehadrin' - An Understanding of the Concept
Rabbi Yehudah Prero - 5755

An End to Our Darkness
Rabbi Berel Wein - 5772

Vengeance vs. Conciliations
Rabbi Berel Wein - 5765



Project Genesis

Torah.org Home


Torah Portion

Jewish Law

Ethics

Texts

Learn the Basics

Seasons

Features

TORAHAUDIO

Ask The Rabbi

Knowledge Base




Help

About Us

Contact Us



Free Book on Geulah!




Torah.org Home
Torah.org HomeCapalon.com Copyright Information