Torah.org Home Subscribe Services Support Us
 
Print Version

Email this article to a friend

Parshas Shlach

The punishment for the events surrounding the sin of the meraglim/spies is that B'nei Yisroel had to spend forty years in the desert, one year for each day of the forty days that the spies spent on their tragic mission. (14:34) In articulating this punishment the pasuk says that the punishment will be on the basis of one day for each year ('yom lashana'). This seems to be backwards. The pasuk should say that the punishment will be one year for each day ('shana layom').

Rashi notes earlier (13:25) that HKB'H miraculously quickened the travel time (or shortened the amount of distance to be covered) for the meraglim. Had the journey taken the normal amount of time - meaning more days would have been spent on the mission - then the punishment (if the meraglim would chose to sin) which was destined to be on the basis of a year per day would have been even longer. Through this intervention by HKB'H the punishment was limited to forty years. [As to why forty is an appropriate maximum number of years, the midrashim further explain that by limiting the punishment to forty years HKB'H was ensuring that those who were twenty at the time of the sin (i.e., just old enough to be punishable for their actions) would live up to, but not beyond, the age of sixty. Sixty is the appropriate age because they were being punished by 'kares'/cutting off of years, meaning not living past sixty. Each person implicated died at age sixty, so the youngest needed forty years to reach sixty.]

Because HKB'H predetermined the outer limit of how many years the punishment would last, it is fitting that the pasuk describes the punishment as being one day for each year, meaning that they spent one day on their journey for each year of the predetermined maximum number of years they would have to be punished if they sinned. See Rabbeynu Bachya.

[Isn't it interesting that we refer to the spies as 'meraglim' even though the Torah does not use that term at all; the Torah always uses versions of the verb 'lasur', but never 'leragel' for the activities of these spies.

Similarly, we refer to the splitting of the Red Sea as 'kriyas yam suf' (literally, the tearing of the sea) as opposed to using the expression used by the Torah, which is always a form of 'bekia'/splitting.]


Gal Einai, Copyright 2006 by Gedalia Litke and Torah.org


 


ARTICLES ON MIKETZ AND CHANUKAH:

View Complete List

Living Lessons
Rabbi Yehudah Prero - 5766

Don't Be Jealous!
Rabbi Yaakov Menken - 5755

A Double Loss!
Rabbi Label Lam - 5767

Frumster - Orthodox Jewish Dating

Paint the World with Light
Rabbi Label Lam - 5775

If You Have It, Don't Flaunt It
Rabbi Yissocher Frand - 5759

A Higher Calling
Rabbi Mordechai Kamenetzky - 5759

> What A Pity!
Rabbi Mordechai Kamenetzky - 5760

Shedding Light on the Identity Crisis
Rabbi Yehudah Prero - 5759

The Good Times are Rolling
Rabbi Label Lam - 5763

Looking for a Chavrusah?

Lessons in Devotion
Rabbi Yehudah Prero - 5756

Turning Points
Rabbi Pinchas Winston - 5760

History Reenacted
Rabbi Yehudah Prero - 5767

ArtScroll

Pharaoh Delivers A Not So Subtle Reminder: I Made You Who You Are
Rabbi Yissocher Frand - 5767

Into the Hands of the Few
Rabbi Yissocher Frand - 5763

The Whole and The Part - Part II
Rabbi Aron Tendler - 5766

Don't Forget the Butler
Shlomo Katz - 5758



Project Genesis

Torah.org Home


Torah Portion

Jewish Law

Ethics

Texts

Learn the Basics

Seasons

Features

TORAHAUDIO

Ask The Rabbi

Knowledge Base




Help

About Us

Contact Us



Free Book on Geulah!




Torah.org Home
Torah.org HomeCapalon.com Copyright Information