Parshas Vayeishev
Tying G-d’s Hands1?
My son’s tunic! A savage animal devoured him!
Rashi: Ruach ha-kodesh flickered within him in uttering these words. He
foretold that an evil animal – Potiphar’s wife – would try to consume him.
Why did Hashem not reveal to Yaakov the truth of what happened to Yosef?
Because the shevatim imposed a cherem, and cursed all who would reveal what
had happened. They included Hashem together with themselves.
What did the shevatim hope to accomplish by including Hashem in their
cherem? How could they possibly have thought that they would somehow force
G-d, as it were, to do their bidding? Why would they believe that their
cherem would hold sway over Hashem, somehow compelling His silence regarding
the circumstances of Yosef’s sale?
It is possible that it was not so much the cherem they believed would work.
Rather, they thoroughly believed that Hashem’s Will coincided with the
effect of the cherem, which was to keep the dark secret from Yaakov. They
understood that if Yaakov learned the truth about how they had treated them,
he might curse them. Such a curse, coming from Yaakov the tzadik, might very
well be effective, just as the tefilah and berachah of a tzadik are
especially potent. Were Yaakov to curse his sons, the future of the Jewish
people would be sorely jeopardized. The shevatim understood that they were
to be the foundation of the Torah nation. Moreover they understood this to
be the Divine Will. As such, Hashem Himself had an interest, so to speak, in
precluding Yaakov’s curse of his sons. Knowing this, they sought to solidify
their cherem. Since their objective and the Divine Mind coincided in a
common interest, they believed that Hashem would honor their cherem.
What difference would a cherem make? Either Hashem would agree to keep the
facts from Yaakov or He wouldn’t! Know this. HKBH grants enormous power to
prayer. Tefilah can change, as it were, the Divine plan for things. Chazal
teach us that even a gezerah, an edict from Heaven that has already been
formulated, can be rescinded through davening.
Yet, there are limits and exceptions. Chazal speak of “oaths” taken by
Hashem that preclude any change in Divine edicts. Similarly, Divine
acquiescence to a cherem would concretize a Heavenly decision, preventing
any further change. The shevatim hoped that by agreeing to their cherem, He
would close the door on any possibility that Yaakov’s earnest prayer might
change Hashem’s plan. Hashem’s agreeing to the cherem would block the
efficacy of Yaakov’s future davening to find out what had occurred to Yosef
on that fateful day. Thus, their secret would be preserved.
This reconstruction leaves room for the efficacy of the cherem – but only
because it enshrined in law what Hashem already wanted. If it is true, we
must ask why Rashi believed that the cherem played any role whatsoever!
Perhaps Hashem kept Yaakov from learning the truth because it was His Will
that he not find out! Perhaps G-d indeed did not wish to upset the plan for
the shevatim to become the foundational generation of the Jewish collective!
We can show that this is not the case. Yaakov came close to discovering the
truth, through this upwelling of ruach hakodesh that Rashi describes. This
means that Yaakov received extraordinary Divine assistance, which stopped
short of its original intent, which was to clue him in on the truth. If
HKBH had firmly resolved on His own that Yaakov would not discover the
truth, He would not have assisted him in coming close to stumbling upon it!
In fact, however, Yaakov did come close, which shows that there was room for
him to tease the truth from Hashem through fervent tefilah. That tefilah
fell short of its objective only because Hashem honored the countervailing
cherem of the shevatim.
The Maharik{2} comes close to this. He finds a different reason, however,
for Hashem to willingly subjugate Himself to the cherem-enforced agreement
of the shevatim. Yaakov absented himself from his parents for twenty-two
years. Yaakov was owed a measure of Divine retribution for this shortcoming.
Midas ha-din called for twenty-two years in which Yaakov would be separated
from his own beloved son. For this to occur, Yaakov would have to be kept
uninformed of Yosef’s whereabouts.
Our approach is superior. Maharik may be correct, but the shevatim surely
would not have known about such a Divine bookkeeping! They had no reason to
suspect that Yaakov was to be punished, measure for measure, for this
twenty-two year lapse in kibud av v’eim. The Maharik’s approach therefore
does not explain what the shevatim hoped to achieve with their cherem.
All our discussion so far is academic. Chazal clearly had something else in
mind. They teach{3} that Hashem was included in the cherem only because
they needed Him for a minyan! Because Reuvain was not part of the council
that sold Yosef into slavery, there were only nine on hand to participate in
their cherem. The shevatim called upon Hashem to join them in formulating
the cherem – not in being bound by it! They asked Him to partner with them,
not to limit Himself to their authority.
This is not strange at all. Hashem indeed “partners” with all of us, because
we all have a portion and stake in Him. Through the connection we have with
the Divine, we can make Him at times to be part of our activity. He is
called Makom – the place of the world. This Name connotes filling out the
totality, being the collective that includes everything. When the shevatim
attempted to act as a collective and found themselves to be one short of the
requisite number of ten, they could count on this aspect of Hashem’s being
to substitute for the missing member of the set.
Following this approach, Hashem abided by the cherem not because it laid any
claim upon Him, but because He decided to honor a cherem that had been
properly formulated by an important and respected collective: the beis din
of the shevatim.
We can still question Rashi’s conclusion. What evidence does Rashi have that
the cherem played any role in Hashem’s conduct. Perhaps He withheld
information from Yaakov because it was necessary for Yosef to remain in
Egypt, eventually luring the rest of the family? Hashem had earlier
foretold{4} that the Bnei Yisrael would be exiled in Egypt. Yosef was the
one who would draw them all there. For this to happen, his story had to
remain hidden.
The answer to this objection is quite simple. Were it only a matter of
bringing about galus Mitzrayim, Yaakov could have been told the truth about
Yosef at the end of the twenty-two years, after Yaakov’s entire clan left
Canaan for Egypt. He was kept in the dark only because of the cherem.
One problem remains. If this analysis is accurate, Rashi should not have
spoken of the shevatim including Hashem in their cherem. Rather, he should
have spoken of Hashem honoring the cherem, once it had been made by them.
His role in the cherem seems irrelevant.
What Rashi means, perhaps, is that the shevatim would not have thought or
asked Hashem to respect their cherem had they not relied upon Him in the
first place to complete the number ten to validate it. Because they
“partnered” with Him in creating the cherem, they believed that there was a
good chance that He would abide by it.
1. Based on Gur Aryeh, Bereishis 37:33
2. Shut Maharik 37:3
3. Tanchuma Vayeishev 2
4. Bereishis 46:2