Parshas Miketz & Rosh Chodesh Teiveis
By Dr. Nosson Chayim Leff
Sfas Emes, Parashas Mikeitz and Rosh Chodesh Teiveis, 5631
In the Sfas Emes's first year as Gerer Rebbe-- 5631 {1871}-- Shabbos
Parshas Mikeitz coincided with Rosh Chodesh Teiveis. Accordingly, on that
Shabbos, the Sfas Emes presented Divrei Torash on both topics: Parshas
Mikeitz and Rosh Chodesh.
The Sfas Emes begins with a comment on one of Par'oh's dreams,
specifically on the dream in which Par'oh sees lean, mangy cows --
symbolizing the power of Evil -- devour pleasantly plump, healthy-looking
cows . The Sfas Emes comments that the dream gives the impression that
Evil dominates the world. Not so, says the Sfas Emes. Notwithstanding
appearances, the apparent autonomy and the power of Evil derive from
HaShem.
The Sfas Emes continues with the discussion of this basic fact of life --
the difficulty of perceiving HaShem's Presence in the world as we usually
see it. Hester -- HaShem's "hiding" from us -- is so pervasive, the Sfas
Emes tells us, that even when we are granted a glimpse of HaShem's
Presence, the purpose of that glimpse is to enable us to get through the
bad times that (the Sfas Emes takes for granted) will follow. Thus, the
Sfas Emes is telling us that when HaShem does permit us to see through the
hester, the reason for that illumination is to sustain us in the times
when kedusha is hidden. ( NOTE : Hester was so powerful and so
pervasive for the people who came to America that a street in the
immigrants' neighborhood was actually named "Hester Street". )
The Sfas Emes moves on now to another theme. He quotes a pasuk in
Yechezkel (46: 1) This posuk was apparently very dear to the Sfas Emes--
so dear that he often quotes it. The pasuk describes an architectural
feature of the future Beis Hamikdash : "... Sha'ar he'chatzeir
ha'penimis, ha'poneh kadim yiheye sagur sheishes yemei hama'aseh; u'beyom
HaShabbos yipase'ach; u'beyom HaChodesh yipasei'ach.' (
ArtScroll: "...The gate of the inner courtyard that faces eastward shall
be closed during the six days of labor; but on the Sabbath day ... and on
the day of the New Moon, it shall be opened.")
The Sfas Emes reads this posuk as telling us two things. First,the pasuk
says that on Shabbos and on Rosh Chodesh, a special channel is opened to
give us easier access to the world's penimiyus. The Sfas Emes also
understands the pasuk to be saying that Shabbos and Rosh Chodesh can be
the keys to enable us to gain access to penimiyus even on the weekdays.
Repeated mention of "penimiyus " raises a basic question. What does the
Sfas Emes have in mind when he refers to 'penimiyus'? When the Sfas Emes
mentions penimiyus, he is referring to the real "real world"; i.e., to
the world in which HaShem's Presence is evident. I say the real "real
world" in contradistinction to the apparent "real world," in which hester
hides HaShem's Presence. The posuk is telling us that Shabbos and Rosh
Chodesh can give us access to the world as it truly is; i.e., not hidden
by the chitzoniyus ( external appearance) of Teva and/or of Hergeil.
The Sfas Emes's non-pshat reading of the pasuk from Yechezkel seems to be
very distant from its simple pshat meaning. Hence, you may wonder ( I
certanly did ) : how does the Sfas Emes get from the pasuk's literal
meaning-- the description of an architectural feature -- to his very
different non-pshat--the description of access to HaShem ? After I
thought about it for a long time, the answer came back: simple. The
posuk's words 'ha'penimis" and ha'poneh" evoke the sound-alike
of "penimiyus".
We can take another step forward in trying to understand the Sfas Emes's
interpretation of the posuk from Yechezkel,. The Sfas Emes reads the "be"
in the posuk's words "u'BE'yom hashabbos " and "u'BE'yom hachodesh" not as
conventionally understood -- as a time word -- that would give us: 'On
Shabbos or on Rosh Chodesh...' Instead, the Sfas Emes reads the
posuk's 'be' as meaning: '' by means of''. Thus, the Sfas Emes is
telling us that by means of Shabbos or Rosh Chodesh, we can open the gate
that blocks our access to the penimiyus -- to HaShem's Omnipresence --
even during the week-- on yemei hama'aseh.
(Note the strength of the Sfas Emes's ko'ach hachidush [innovative
power]. The posuk in Yechezkel tells us unambiguously that the gate
should remain closed on weekdays. The Sfas Emes just opened it.)
The Sfas Emes moves on now to include discussion of topics from Parshas
Mikeitz. The Sfas Emes spoke earlier about the possibility of a major
spiritual breakthrough: to have access to the 'inner court' not only on
Shabbos, but on weekdays as well. Now he adds a powerful precondition : to
achieve that breakthrough, we must adhere to the bris (the covenant).
What is this bris to which the Sfas Emes refers? Bris milah, which many
authorities view as a means of diminishing sexuality.
More generally, the Sfas Emes tell us, to live our lives in a manner
consistent with the covenant, we would be well advised to follow the model
that Yosef exemplified -- the model for which he is called "Yosef
HaTzadik". The Sfas Emes explains that Yosef kept the bris under very
difficult conditions. The Sfas Emes is referring here to Yosef's handling
of sexuality, most notably with the wife of Potifar.
The Sfas Emes has just told us that bris milah is a key feature of our
relationship with HaShem. Why so? Because unbridled sexuality is the most
powerful competitor to our living our lives in constant awareness of
HaShem's Presence. Why is it so important that we live our lives fully
aware of HaShem's Presence? Because by so doing, a person can
achieve "hisbatlus" -- subordinating his/her will to the will of HaShem,
and his/her agenda to the agenda of HaShem. Such hisbatlus -- even in a
small measure -- can enable a person to reach a state of Ahavas HaShem --
love of HaShem. For the Seforim define love as a state in which one
gives priority to the will of the beloved over one's own will.
The Sfas Emes goes on to point out that Rosh Chodesh, too, can be an
opportunity for access to the penimiyus. Because the new moon is a
phenomenon of nature, we can use Rosh Chodesh as a trampoline to perceive
HaShem behind nature. Thus, instead of seeing Teva as fixed and
unchanging, we can see HaShem constantly giving it existence. You may
ask : what is so bad about not seeing HaShem behind Teva? The answer is
straightforward. A failure to be aware of HaShem being behind nature may
be part of a general lack of awareness about what is going on,
metaphysically, in our lives. And a life lived in a state of unawareness -
- in a rut of habit -- is the very opposite of the state of hischadshus --
the constant freshness with which we are enjoined to live our lives.
More information concerning control of sexuality. The Sfas Emes tells us
that if we keep the bris, we will be able to perceive Hashem even in
golus. He notes that the golus began only when B'nai Yisroel stopped
keeping the bris in the way that Yosef had. The Sfas Emes has focused on
the loss of control of sexuality as a key feature of our golus in Egypt.
This may be a part of the story that you were not told when you were a
child. But we have this feature from Chazal; the Sfas Emes did not
invent it.
Thus, the Sfas Emes cites a Medrash Rabba on Parshas Shemos. The posuk on
which the Medrash comments is (Shemos, 1:8) : 'Vayokom melech chadash'
(ArtScroll: 'A new king arose in Egypt...'). After he refers to the text
in Medrash Rabba, the Sfas Emes says: 'Ayein shom' ('Look it up!').
Knowing the importance of heeding the words of a tzadik, we do look it up.
And we find the Medrash (on the posuk: 'Vayokom melech chadash') quoting
Hoshe'ah (5:7): "Be'Hashem bagadu ki banim zarim yaladu; ata yochaleim
chodesh'. (That is: "They have betrayed HaShem, for they have begotten
alien children. Now a month will devour them.")
By directing us to the Medrash in Shemos, the Sfas Emes is telling us that
the golus in Egypt came in the following sequence. Bnei Yisroel gave up
Bris Milah, thereby losing control of their sexuality. Thus, they failed
to follow the model that Yosef Hatzadik had provided for Jewish survival
in Egypt. As a result, they lost awareness of the world's constant
hischadshus and HaShem's Omnipresence. At that point, with Bnei Yisroel
locked into Teva and Hergeil, "Vayokom melech chadash...'
(Note the irony in this phrase now that the Sfas Emes has shown us the
interplay of chadash, hischadshus, and chodesh.)
Text Copyright © 2004 by Rabbi Dr. Nosson Chayim Leff and Torah.org.