Selected Halachos Related to Parshas Bereishis
By Rabbi Doniel Neustadt
The following is a discussion of Halachic topics related to the Parsha of the week.
For final rulings, consult your Rav.
CORRECTING THE BA'AL KOREH
Every adult male(1) is obligated to hear a portion of the Torah read from a
kosher Sefer Torah every Shabbos. While this is an ancient obligation dating
back to the days of Moshe Rabbeinu(2), it is considered a Rabbinical
mitzvah(3). Initially, there were various customs as to the length of the
portion to be read every Shabbos(4), but eventually it became universally
accepted to complete the entire Torah each year, beginning from Shabbos
Bereishis and ending on Simchas Torah(5).
The reader must read, and the congregation must hear, every single word of
the weekly parshah. Even if one word was omitted, the reading must be
repeated(6). This is true even if the missing word did not in any way alter
the meaning of the phrase or verse(7).
The ba'al koreh should read each word clearly, with the proper accentuation
(mileil and milra), vocalization (nikud) and cantillation (trop). In order
to read the Torah properly he must prepare thoroughly(8) so that the reading
will "flow out of his mouth". The reading itself should not be hurried, lest
he swallow a word or a letter(9).
CORRECTING THE READER'S MISTAKES
It is important for the ba'al koreh to read carefully so that he makes no
mistakes, not even small, insignificant ones. But if he did make a mistake,
there is a difference of opinion among the Rishonim if he must be stopped
and corrected or not. The Tur(10) is of the opinion that as long as the word
was recited, even if it was seriously mispronounced, it does not matter and
the reading is valid. There is no requirement to go back and correct the
mistake, and indeed it may be prohibited to do so since it will needlessly
embarrass the ba'al koreh who will appear incompetent or ill-prepared.
Rambam, however, disagrees and maintains that even the smallest mistake
should be immediately corrected.
Shulchan Aruch seems to make a compromise between the two views. Whether or
not the ba'al koreh needs to be corrected when mispronouncing a word depends
on the type of mistake he made. A "major" mistake requires correction while
a "minor" mistake does not: therefore, the ba'al koreh should be publicly
corrected only for a "major" mistake. Privately, however, the reader is
rebuked for his lack of preparedness or inattentiveness to detail(11).
The issue to decide, therefore, is what constitutes a "major" mistake and
what is considered a "minor" mistake. Rama maintains that if the mistake
alters the meaning of the word it is considered "major", but if it only
affects the trop or the nikud then it is considered "minor". The latter
authorities debate what, exactly, the Rama meant, as there are various
opinions as to what constitutes an altered meaning and what does not. In the
final analysis there are three group of mistakes: major, minor and midsize.
MAJOR MISTAKES INCLUDE:
When a word is completely misread; e.g., bereishis is read berushies or
When the nikud of a word is pronounced in a manner which alters the
translation of the word. For example, the word chalav with a komatz (milk)
is read with a tzeirei (fat), or the word ya'aseh (he should do) is read
yie'aseh (it should be done).
When the trop is completely wrong, to the degree that the reader combines
two unrelated words or phrases, or separates two words or phrases which
should be read together. The trop indicates not only the musical note on
which the syllable or word should be sung, but also the punctuation of the
pasuk, as the Torah has no punctuation marks. For example, one could read
all of the constants and vowels of the first pasuk in the Torah correctly,
and still mangle the trop so that the pasuk would read: In the beginning
created, Hashem the, heaven and earth(12).
According to some opinions, when the mileil or milra is read completely
wrong, to the degree that it alters the meaning of the word; e.g., the word
bahah (milra) means 'she is coming,' (present tense) while the same word
accented bahah (mileil) means 'she came' (past tense)(13). Similarly, the
word binah can mean either 'understanding' or 'perceive', depending on which
syllable is accented, binah or binah(14).
Other opinions maintain that this type of mistake is not considered a major
mistake. In their view, the exact meaning of the word is decided by the
context in which it is written; the meaning is not altered by the improper
accentuation of the word(15).
As stated earlier, Shulchan Aruch and most poskim(16) rule that major
mistakes should be rectified immediately. The ba'al koreh, therefore, is
stopped mid sentence - even if he said the Name of Hashem(17) - and told to
correct his pronunciation(18). Even if the mistake is realized after the
aliyah is over, or even after the entire parshah is finished [but before the
final blessing over the Torah is recited](19), the word must be repeated and
This ruling of the Shulchan Aruch is the accepted practice in most
congregations. Note, however, that several poskim(21) disagree with the
Shulchan Aruch and rule in accordance with the Tur that once a mistake was
made, even if the meaning of the word was altered, it need not be
MINOR MISTAKES INCLUDE:
Misreading of vowels which does not alter the basic meaning of the word,
e.g., the word "eis" with a tzeirei under the aleph instead of segol (es);
the word "kol" with a cholom instead of kal with a kamatz; the word "lecha"
with a kametz instead of lach with a sheva(23); the word "aretz" with a
kametz under the aleph instead of eretz with a segol. There are many more
such examples, and they account for most of the errors that the average
ba'al koreh commits.
Misreading of the trop which does not alter the basic meaning of the verse.
e.g., failure to stress the revii note over the word v'haretz in the second
pasuk of this week's parshah.
The procedure concerning minor mistakes is clear: all of the poskim are in
agreement that the reader is not corrected; he is allowed to continue(24).
We have mentioned earlier that when there is no requirement to correct
mistakes, it may very well be prohibited to do so, since correcting the
ba'al koreh publicly embarrasses him. It is puzzling, therefore, why many
congregations do not conduct themselves properly and correct even minor
mistakes when they should not do so. There are two possible explanations
(limud zechus) for their behavior: 1) The ba'al koreh has made it clear to
the rabbi or officers of the shul that he does not mind being corrected and
does not consider it an embarrassment; 2) If the ba'al koreh is paid for his
services, it may be permissible to correct him for even minor mistakes since
he is hired to do a perfect job(25).
MIDSIZE MISTAKES are significant changes in the pronunciation of the word or
even in its exact translation, but not to the degree that it alters the
basic meaning of the phrase or the verse. These include(26):
When a letter is omitted, e.g., the name Aharon, which contains the sounds
of an aleph and a hay, is read as Haron (with a patach), omitting the
When a letter is added, e.g., the word Mitzrayim, written with one yud, is
read as if it were written with two yuds (Mitzriyim). While these two words
are pronounced differently, they have the same meaning essentially.
When a letter is added as a prefix, e.g., the letter vov is added to a word,
"v'im" (and if) instead of "im" (if).
When two letters are inverted but the mistake does not alter the meaning,
e.g., the word keves is mistakenly read as kesev. Both words refer to a
Regarding these types of mistakes there are two views. Some are of the
opinion that they are not significant and do not need to be corrected. The
ba'al koreh may continue reading [though he is rebuked privately](29).
Others maintain that these types of mistakes must be corrected immediately
and one must follow the same procedure as when a major mistake is made(30).
While individual shuls may rely on the first view and allow such mistakes
to go unchecked, many congregations have adopted the second, more stringent
view. It is left to the rabbi and officers of each shul to establish their
own standard for kerias ha-Torah.
1. While some authorities maintain that women are also required to hear
kerias ha-Torah, the accepted custom is that listening to the Torah reading
is not a woman's obligation; Mishnah Berurah 282:12; Aruch ha-Shulchan
2. Rambam, Tefilah 12:1.
3. Mishnah Berurah 282:2.
4. See Megilah 29b that in Eretz Yisrael the custom was to finish the Torah
once every three years. See Emes l'Yaakov, ibid. for the apportionment of
the weekly reading segments based on a three-year cycle.
5. Rambam, Tefilah 13:1. See Igros Moshe O.C. 4:23 and 4:40-5 who explains
that once this became universally accepted, it has turned into a
6. O.C. 137:3 and 282:7.
7. Beiur Halachah 142:1.
8. Even a ba'al koreh who is familiar with the parshah should review it at
least twice; Aruch ha-Shulchan 139:2.
9. Mishnah Berurah 142:6.
10. O.C. 142. The Tur quotes this view in the name of the Ba'al ha-Manhig,
and according to most opinions, this is the Tur's view as well.
11. Rama O.C. 142:1. While Rama does not specify the details of how the ba'al
koreh is rebuked, the Tur and Bais Yosef imply that the rebuke should not
take place publicly so as to not embarrass the reader.
12. Mishnah Berurah 142:4.
13. As explained by Rashi, Bereishis 29:6. See Aruch ha-Shulchan O.C. 690:20
(concerning Megilas Esther) who mentions this example.
14. Reb Chaim of Volozhin in Keser Rosh (40).
15. See Karyana D'igerta (Harav Y. Y. Kanievsky) 1:138; Emes l'Yaakov (Harav
Y. Kamenetsky) O.C. 142:1. See Dikdukei Shai, pg. 160-165, for an
explanation of this view. Note,also, that all the major poskim who discuss
the laws of correcting a ba'al koreh do not mention this type of mistake as
one that must be corrected.
16. Chayei Adam 31:31; Mishnah Berurah 142:4 and Beiur Halachah; Aruch
ha-Shulchan 142:3-4; Kaf ha-Chayim 142:2.
17. Chayei Adam 5:2; Mishnah Berurah 142:4; Sha'arei Rachamim on Sha'arei
Efrayim 3:18. See Tzitz Eliezer 12:40.
18. Preferably, he should start again from the beginning of the pasuk or - at
the very least - from the beginning of the phrase (within the pasuk), see
Mishnah Berurah 64:5 and Tehilah l'Dovid 64:1 (concerning Kerias Shema). See
also Igros Moshe O.C. 5:20-32 (concerning zeicher and zecher).
19. Chayei Adam 31:31 and Beiur Halachah 142:1.
20. See Mishnah Berurah 142:2 and Sha'ar ha-Tziyun for the correct procedure.
21. Bach O.C. 142; Eliyahu Rabbah 142:2, Siddur Derech ha-Chayim (15); Da'as
Torah 142:1. See also Aruch ha-Shulchan 690:20.
22. While this view is not the accepted practice, the poskim rely on it if
the mistake was realized after the final blessing on the Torah was recited.
23. Most often this depends on where in the verse the word appears and/or
what the trop is. There is no alteration of meaning. Sometimes, however,
lach is written for a nekeivah and lecha is written for zachar; in that case
the meaning is altered.
24. As mentioned earlier, he is reprimanded in private.
25. See Eishel Avraham O.C. 142 who suggests a similar idea.
26. Based on Mishnah Berurah 142:4 and Beiur Halachah.
27. See Pri Megadim 142:1 who writes that the same applies to reading Avraham
instead of Avram or vice versa.
28. See Mishnah Berurah 143:26.
29. Mishnah Berurah 142:4 and all the poskim mentioned earlier who rule in
accordance with the Tur against the Shulchan Aruch.
30. Pri Chadash 142, Beiur ha-Gra 142, Chayei Adam 31:31, Aruch ha-Shulchan
142: 3-4; Kaf ha-Chayim 142:2.
Weekly-Halacha, Copyright © 1999 by Rabbi Neustadt, Dr. Jeffrey Gross and
Project Genesis, Inc.
Rabbi Neustadt is the principal of Yavne
Teachers' College in Cleveland, Ohio. He is also the Magid Shiur of a daily
Mishna Berurah class at Congregation Shomre Shabbos.
The Weekly-Halacha Series is distributed L'zchus Hayeled Doniel Meir ben
Hinda. Weekly sponsorships are available--please send email to the moderator, Dr.
Jeffrey Gross firstname.lastname@example.org.
The series is distributed by the Harbotzas Torah Division of Congregation
Shomre Shabbos, 1801 South Taylor Road, Cleveland Heights, Ohio 44118--HaRav
Yisroel Grumer, Marah D'Asra