Parshas Lech Lecha
Tevillas Keilim: Questions and Answers
Question: Do utensils which are manufactured by a Jewish company but sold in
a store owned by non-Jews require tevilas keilim?
Discussion: Yes, they must be immersed. While most poskim hold that a
blessing is recited, some hold that no blessing is recited in this case.
Question: Do utensils manufactured by a company owned by non-observant Jews
Question: Do utensils which were manufactured by a Jewish-owned company
whose workers are not Jewish, or which were manufactured by a gentile-owned
company whose workers are Jewish, require tevilah?
Discussion: Most poskim maintain that the determining factor is the owner of
the factory or company which manufactures the utensil — who the workers are
is irrelevant. The following rules apply:
If the manufacturing company is —
owned by a Jew, no tevilah is required even if the workers are not
owned by a non-Jew, tevilah is required even if the workers are Jewish.
co-owned by a Jew and a non-Jew, tevilah is required.
a public corporation (or a government agency ) which is controlled by
non-Jews, tevilah is required. If the corporation is controlled by Jews,
tevilah is not required.
Important note: As stated in yesterday’s Discussion, if the utensil was
bought from a non-Jewish store, it still requires tevilah even if it was
manufactured by a Jewish-owned company. For example, utensils that were made
in Israel are only exempt from tevilah if they are bought in a store owned
or controlled by Jews.
Question: What should be done if — after research — one cannot determine if
the utensil was manufactured by Jews or non-Jews?
Discussion: If the item was manufactured anywhere in the world except
Israel, the utensil should be immersed and the blessing recited, as the vast
majority of manufacturers world-wide are non-Jewish. If the item was
manufactured in Israel and the item was bought in a Jewish store, no tevilah
is required at all. If one cannot determine where the item was manufactured,
tevilah should be performed without reciting the blessing.
Question: Does a sticker left on a utensil invalidate the tevilah?
Discussion: In most cases, when the sticker should have been removed or will
be removed at a later date, the sticker is considered a chatzitzah which
invalidates the tevilah and the immersion must be repeated. In the atypical
case where the sticker is supposed to remain on the utensil, then the
sticker does not need to be removed before tevilah and is not considered a
Question: If a utensil inadvertently falls into the mikveh, is the immersion
valid or must it be repeated l’sheim mitzvas tevilah?
Discussion: The immersion, although inadvertent, is valid and need not be
repeated. Tevilas keilim does not need to be performed l’sheim mitzvah.
Question: May a boy under the age of thirteen or a girl under the age of
twelve be given the task of performing tevilas keilim?
Discussion: Technically speaking, yes. As mentioned yesterday, even utensils
which fell into the mikveh inadvertently are considered immersed; surely
then, if they were immersed by a child the tevilah is valid. But practically
speaking, if an adult did not supervise the tevilah, we have no assurance
that the utensil was immersed properly. Merely relying on the child’s
say-so, even a child who is generally responsible and trustworthy, is not
always halachically sufficient, especially in cases where the obligation of
tevilah is min ha-Torah. The following rules apply:
Utensils made of gold, silver, copper, iron, tin and lead, which require
tevilah min ha-Torah, may not be immersed by a minor unless an adult
supervises the tevilah. If an adult failed to supervise the tevilah,
then it must be repeated by an adult. The blessing, however, should not be
Utensils which must be immersed mi-deRabanan, such as those made of
aluminum, glass (including Pyrex, Duralex and Corelle), glazed
earthenware, lead-coated earthenware, china, Corningware or porcelain
enamel, l’chatchilah should also be immersed by an adult. But if
an adult is not available, they may be given to a responsible and
trustworthy minor for tevilah. The minor then recites the blessing over
Question: May tevilas keilim be performed by a non-Jew?
Discussion: Since, as explained previously (18 Shevat), tevilas keilim does
not need to be performed l’sheim mitzvah, it is permissible for a non-Jew to
perform the tevilah as long as a Jew is standing by and supervising that it
is being done properly. It is permitted — even l’chatchilah — for a Jew
to recite the blessing and immerse the first utensil and then have a non-Jew
immerse the rest of the utensils.
If a non-Jew claims that he immersed utensils but there was no proper
supervision, the tevilah must be repeated. Whether or not a blessing should
be recited over this tevilah will depend on several factors. A rav should be
Question: Some refrigerator parts, such as the racks or vegetable bins, are
made from metal or glass, and food is sometimes placed directly on or in
them. Do they require tevilah?
Discussion: This question was presented to Rav S.Z. Auerbach, who
responded that it has become customary that neither the refrigerator itself,
not its removable parts, undergo tevilah. He suggested that the custom
is based on the fact that a refrigerator is a large, stationary object which
is generally not shifted around. Thus neither it nor its parts are
considered keilei seudah, utensils used for a meal, and they are therefore
exempt from tevilah.
Note, however, that other poskim disagree and hold that the size of the
utensil and the way that it is used have no bearing on the issue and do not
exempt the utensil from tevilah.
1. Based on Y.D. 120:11.
2. See Darchei Teshuvah, Y.D. 120:81 and Tevilas Keilim 3:2. See also oral
ruling by Rav M. Feinstein (quoted in Oholei Yeshurun, pg. 41).
3. Igros Moshe, Y.D. 3:21.
4. Chasam Sofer (quoted in Tzitz Eliezer 8:19); Doveiv Meisharim 1:85;
Igros Moshe, O.C. 3:4; Rav C. Kanievsky (Halichos Chayim, vol. 2, pg. 117).
5. Aruch ha-Shulchan, Y.D. 120:58; Darchei Teshuvah 120:81; Igros Moshe,
6. A minority view dissents and requires tevilah without a blessing; see
Kitzur Shulchan Aruch 37:6.
7. A minority view dissents and permits — under extenuating circumstances —
using utensils made of glass without tevilah in this case; see Pischei
Teshuvah, Y.D. 120:12.
8. Based on Shach, Y.D. 120:26. See Beiur ha-Gra 28. A minority view
dissents and maintains that no blessing is recited over this tevilah; see
Sho’el u’Meishiv, Kama, 2:73.
9. Igros Moshe, Y.D. 2:39.
10. Rav M. Feinstein (oral ruling, quoted in Oholei Yeshurun, pg. 41). See
also Tevilas Keilim, pg. 64, quoting Rav S.Z. Auerbach.
11. Chazon Ish, Y.D. 37:15; Igros Moshe, O.C. 3:4; Yabia Omer, Y.D. 6:12. A
minority view holds that the blessing should not be recited; see Darchei
Teshuvah, Y.D. 120:81, quoting Teshuras Shai.
12. Tevilas Keilim, pg. 122, quoting Rav Y.Y. Weiss and Rav S. Wosner.
13. Shach, Y.D. 120:28; Chochmas Adam 73:22.
14. Some poskim hold that merely being over bar or bas mitzvah age is
insufficient; to perform tevilas keilim one must display signs of puberty.
See Pischei Teshuvah, Y.D. 120:14.
15. Rama, Y.D. 120:14. If an adult is supervising, then even l’chatchilah a
minor may immerse the utensils and recite the blessing; Levush, Y.D. 120:14.
16. Based on the view of Beiur ha-Gra, Y.D. 127:32, that a minor can be
trusted when it is beyado lesaken. See also Chochmas Adam 72:16.
17. Igros Moshe, Y.D. 3:22.
18. Mishnah Berurah 509:30.
19. Binas Adam 73:65. See also Pri Megadim, Mishbetzos, O.C. 451:31.
20. Since Pri Megadim, Mishbetzos 451:6, quoted by Pischei Teshuvah, Y.D.
120:14 remains doubtful if a minor can be trusted in cases of ischazek isura.
21. Rav Akiva Eiger, Y.D. 120:14; Chochmas Adam 73:21. See also Mishnah
Berurah 437:17 and Sha’ar ha-Tziyun 19, who rules that minors may be trusted
in mi-deRabanan cases of ischazek isura.
22. Darchei Teshuvah, Y.D. 120:105.
23. Y.D. 120:15.
24. Taz, Y.D. 120:
25. Under certain conditions, we may, to some extent, accept a
“trustworthy” non-Jew’s word, e.g., mesiyach lefi tumo; see Chochmas Adam 72:17.
26. Minchas Shlomo 2:66-8. [Based on this response, we can assume that a
spring-water cooler (Oasis), which is a large stationary object, and a
microwave turntable which is part of a stationary object, do not require
27. See also Be’er Moshe 4:99 who notes that it has become customary not
to immerse refrigerator parts.
28. See Aruch ha-Shulchan, Y.D. 120:39, who applies the same principle to
exempt large metal vats from tevilah.
29. See Chochmas Adam 73:13 and Binas Adam, Teshuvos Mahri Asad 216,
Tevilas Keilim, pg. 196 and 237 and Chelkas Binyamin 120:3. See also
Halichos Chayim, vol. 2, pg. 116, where Rav C. Kanievsky remains undecided
on this issue.
Weekly-Halacha, Text Copyright © 2010 by Rabbi Neustadt, Dr. Jeffrey Gross and Torah.org.
Rabbi Neustadt is the Yoshev Rosh of the Vaad Harabbonim of Detroit and the Av Beis Din of the Beis Din Tzedek of Detroit. He could be reached at email@example.com
The Repetitive Trap
Rabbi Naftali Reich - 5770
Mo' Better Jews
Rabbi Mordechai Kamenetzky - 5760
The Cure for Something
Rabbi Dovid Green - 5760
Crowned With Humility
Rabbi Yaakov Menken - 5760
Those Small Details...
Rabbi Berel Wein - 5760
Closed Gates and Dead-Ends
Rabbi Eliyahu Hoffmann - 5761
Bearing the Burden
Rabbi Chaim Flom - 5767
Let's Step Up To The Plate
Rabbi Naftali Reich - 5772
What He Wants Will Be
Rabbi Raymond Beyda - 5763
Setting the Example
Rabbi Aron Tendler - 5761
It's the Real Thing
Rabbi Mordechai Kamenetzky - 5759
Chance of a Lifetime
Rabbi Raymond Beyda - 5767
Shlomo Katz - 5767
Shlomo Katz - 5761
The Eruv Rav: Then and Now
Rabbi Pinchas Winston - 5773
In Search Of Whole
Rabbi Aron Tendler - 5762