Parshas Netzavim
Going Beyond Realization
Rabbi Yosef Kalatsky
1. Going Beyond Realization
The Torah states, "It will be that when all these things come upon you -
the blessing and the curse that I have presented before you - then you will
take it to heart among all the nations where Hashem, your G-d, has
dispersed you; and you will return unto Hashem..." The dispersion of the
Jewish people into exile is unparalleled by any other people. In this state
of exile, Hashem brings blessing and curse upon them so that they should
reflect upon their situation and fully comprehend their predicament and
thus take it to heart. It is only after the Jewish people have reflected
and introspected that they will do teshuvah (repent).
Sforno explains the term "take it to heart" to mean that one must
introspect in a serious manner in order to discern between truth and
falseness. It is only when one assesses and evaluates himself to that
degree that he will realize that he is not as righteous as he believed
himself to be. There are many areas that one does fall short. In addition
to the obvious transgressions such as lashon hara (evil speech), there are
many failings, which we do not sense - such as performing mitzvos (by rote)
without the proper intent, or not sufficiently engaging in Torah study.
The Gemara in Tractate Shabbos tells us that after one passes away, he
stands before the heavenly court to be judged. He is first asked, "Did you
deal honestly in business? And did you set fixed times for the study of
Torah?" And then he is asked other questions about his entire life - what
he did or did not do properly. Thus, one must take his behavior to heart
(introspection) and repent before passing away.
In the Portion of Ki Savo, the Tochacha relates what Hashem will bring upon
one who does not adhere to the Torah. "Hashem will strike you with madness
and with blindness, and with a confounding of heart." Rashi explains the
term "confounding of heart" to mean that Hashem will seal one's
heart. This means that he will have no sensitivity or receptivity to
spirituality. Therefore, one must introspect ("take to heart") so that the
curse of "confounding of the heart" does not come about.
The heart unfortunately desires many things; some are in accordance with
the Torah while others are not. We ask Hashem in the blessings of the Shema
to "Designate our hearts exclusively to love/fear Him (Hashem)." The
Chofetz Chaim uses an allegory to explain the meaning of the heart
"exclusively" loving/fearing Hashem. A diamond dealer who specialized in
large and precious stones approaches a third party to safeguard a chest of
diamonds for him while he is away. The diamond dealer explains to this
individual that his stones are wrapped in a silk cloth within the chest.
After hearing how special these stones are, the perspective custodian asked
if he could admire them while they are in his possession. The diamond
dealer agrees. The custodian, unable to contain his curiosity, opens the
box and unwraps the silk cloth, which contains the rare, precious
diamonds. As he is unwrapping the stones he notices that they are
intermingled with pieces of putrid and decaying food. He is taken aback at
the lunacy of the diamond dealer keeping such precious stones intermixed
with such putrid matter.
One may have Torah and spirituality in his heart and a willingness to do
the Will of Hashem. However, simultaneously, he may also possess other
desires and interests, which are contrary to the Torah. This is the
equivalent of containing something of infinite value with something that is
abominable in the same location. Thus we pray to Hashem to "Designate our
hearts" to exclusively love and fear Him and to be devoid of anything that
is contrary to that.
The Torah states that one must "take it to heart" and repent. However if
one's heart has no sense of spirituality it would be virtually impossible
to introspect on one's behavior and do proper teshuvah. Therefore we pray
to Hashem to open our hearts (to spirituality) and to designate them
exclusively to do His Will. It is only when G-d gives us a sense of
spirituality that we can truly reflect on our past behavior and do teshuvah.
2. Silence - The Ultimate Indicator
The Torah states, "The hidden (sins) are for Hashem, our G-d, but the
revealed (sins) are for us and our children forever, to carry out all the
words of this Torah." Although the Jewish people had entered into the
covenant of communal responsibility for one another, there was no
culpability to others if one individual had sinned in private. However, if
an individual had sinned when others were aware, then there is communal
culpability.
There are dots that appear in the sefer Torah over the words "lanu u
l'vaneinu - for us and our children." Rashi explains that the significance
of these dots is to teach us that, "Even regarding the sins that are known
to others, the Jewish people were not culpable for them until after they
had crossed the Jordan."
One of the most serious failings of the Jewish people was the Sin of the
Golden Calf, which occurred shortly after they had left Egypt. The Jewish
people were held culpable for this serious breech and transgression. It is
important to note that although the vast majority of the Jewish people did
not actually participate in the idolatrous behavior, there was communal
accountability, which caused them to forfeit the special level of
spirituality attained at Sinai. The actual idol worshippers were either
killed by the sword or perished after drinking water that contained the
dust of the Golden Calf.
Since this infraction occurred nearly 40 years before the Jewish people
crossed the Jordan, why were they all culpable and deserving of extinction
for the Sin of the Golden Calf? There are a number of sins, which occurred
throughout the desert-wandering period in which the entire Jewish people
were reprimanded and criticized for the failings of the few. How do we
understand this? According to Rashi the Jewish people were not communally
responsible for one another until after the covenant at Har Greezim. In
addition, the Torah relates several incidents in the desert in which the
entire Jewish people were held culpable for sins which were committed in
public. How do we understand this?
The Gemara in Tractate Shabbos tells us that at the time of the destruction
of the Temple, G-d had instructed the Angel of Death to paint the letter
"tuf" in red on the foreheads of all of the rashaim (evil people) so that
they should be marked for death. However, regarding the tzaddikim
(righteous people) Hashem instructed the Angel of Death to paint the letter
"tuf" in black to indicate that they should be spared. Satan complained to
Hashem that the tzaddikim should also be marked with the letter "tuf" in
red for death because they did not intercede and protest to prevent the
rashaim from sinning. They remained silent. Thus they also deserved to
die. Hashem responded to satan that even if the tzaddikim had protested,
their admonishments would not have been heeded. Satan responded, "Although
it is true what You say, the tzaddikim did not know that their rebuke would
have been ignored and fallen on deaf ears. Since they did not protest,
the tzaddikim also deserve to die." Hashem concurred with satan. Is
this culpability a consequence of Jews being responsible for one another or
is it due to some other failing?
The Prophet Yechezkel states, "The reason the communities of Sodom and
Gomorrah were destroyed was because they did not extend their hand to the
poor." They did not give charity nor did they have compassion for the
needy. Reb Elchonon Wasserman z'tl asks, "Since giving charity is not one
of the Seven Noachide Laws, why 'should the communities of Sodom and
Gomorrah be held accountable and destroyed for not providing for the
needy?" Reb Elchonon explains that there are certain mitzvos that one does
not need to be commanded to perform. For example, if one witnesses the
suffering of his fellow, he does not need to be instructed to assist
him. Since the human being was created with the innate ability to have
compassion, to act indifferently is considered cruelty. The people of Sodom
and Gomorrah witnessed their fellows being deprived at an extreme level and
did nothing to assist them. Thus, they deserved to be destroyed.
When the sin of the Golden Calf was being perpetrated, even if one was not
actively involved in its worship, nevertheless, there was
culpability. After Hashem communicated with every Jew face to face at
Sinai, how was it possible that the same people could witness His Name
being disgraced to such a degree and remain silent? How could they allow
this abomination to be brought into their midst and not
intervene? Therefore, remaining silent is considered their own failing and
unrelated to the concept of Jews being responsible for one another
(communal responsibility).
The concept of "Yisroel areivim zeh l'zeh- Jews are responsible for one
another" is that the failing of one Jew is considered the failing of
another. If one could have prevented his fellow from transgressing and he
did not - it is considered his failing. Unlike the Sin of the Golden Calf,
the sin of the idolaters is not transposed to those who remained silent.
Bilaam, Yisro, and Iyov (Job) were the three advisors to Pharaoh. Bilaam
had recommended the enslavement of the Jewish people as the solution to
controlling their proliferation in Egypt. Pharaoh agreed that this
suggestion should be implemented immediately. When Yisro became aware of
this, he fled Egypt to go to Midian as a sign of protest. Iyov, the third
advisor, remained silent. We read about the overwhelming suffering of
Iyov. It was because of his silence when the bondage began that he suffered
to the degree that he did. Iyov's rationale to remain silent was - even if
he had protested, Pharaoh would not have listened to him. He believed that
enslavement would have gone forward regardless of his displeasure.
Iyov had lost his children, his wife, his wealth and he suffered
physically. The Brisker Rav z'tl explains how to correlate the "measure for
measure" of Iyov's silence with his suffering. Hashem initially had asked
him after "After seeing such an evil being perpetrated, how could you have
remained silent?" Iyov's response to Hashem was, "Even if I would have
protested it would have accomplished nothing. Therefore I remained
silent." Hashem said, "I understand your position."
Subsequently, Iyov experienced many serious setbacks and personal
tragedies. He was at a point when he was writhing in pain and crying out
when Hashem said to him, "Why are you crying and screaming?" Iyov
responded, "I cry because I am in pain." Hashem then asked him, "When you
cry does it alleviate your pain?" Then Hashem said, "It is clear that when
one is in pain one cries. Therefore it is only an indication that you were
not pained in Egypt when you remained silent and did not protest against
the unconscionable measures that were taken against the Jews,
When the Jewish people were violating the Torah in its entirety during the
Temple period, the tzaddikim remained silent and did not attempt to
intercede. Although it would not have made a difference even if they had
(as G-d said to satan); nevertheless, their silence is an indication that
they were not affected and pained by the desecration of Hashem's Name that
was being brought about by their fellows. Thus, because of their own
failing they did deserve to die with the rashaim.
The principle of "One Jew is responsible for his fellow Jew" only has
relevance when one could prevent his fellow from transgressing and he does
not make the effort. In this case, the one who did not intercede is
culpable for the sin of his fellow. However, the other situations cited
above do not fall under this category. They are examples in which silence
indicated insensitivity to the chillul Hashem (desecration of G-d's Name)
that was taking place.
There are many situations in which we need to be anguished - whether it is
the problem of assimilation, which is tragic and catastrophic, or other
problems affecting the Jewish people as a whole. Many Jews are being
alienated continuously from their heritage. Are we truly pained by this or
is its value simply table talk?
3. Choosing Life
The Torah states, "I have placed life and death before you, blessing and
curse - choose life so that you will live, you and your offspring..." Moshe presented the Jewish people with the choice "to live" or "die" and to be "blessed" or "cursed." He then encouraged them to
choose life. Why did Moshe need to encourage the Jewish people to choose
life? Is it not obvious that when one is presented with a choice that he
will choose life? Evidently, one may have a different understanding of
"life" and "death." Since the correct perception is not clear, Moshe needs
to encourage the Jewish people to choose life as the Torah defines it.
Rashi cites Chazal who explain "choose life..." to mean, "I (Hashem) am
directing you to choose the path of life as a father tells his son - when
you choose a portion from my estate, choose for yourself the best
portion." Chazal depict Hashem's encouragement and urging as a father
advising His son to do what is in the best interest of His child (the
Jewish people). One must be cognizant of the father/child relationship
between G-d and the Jewish people- just as a parent is selflessly dedicated
to the welfare of the child so too is Hashem dedicated to the well being
and spiritual advancement of the Jewish people. A Jew must feel that
Hashem's encouragement and mandate is in his best interest, even though he
may not realize it.
The Torah perspective of life is that existence is only a means to an end -
which is to develop oneself spiritually. As the Mishna in Pirkei Avos
(Ethics of our Fathers) states, "Make your Torah study primary and your
work secondary." Physical existence is only the precursor to the spiritual
existence, which is the world to come. One tenet of Judaism is that there
is a world to come. Therefore, a person must utilize the physical for the
performance of mitzvos in order to be spiritually developed.
The essence of the Jew is his spirituality; however, we are in constant
conflict between that and our inclination, which is for the physical.
Because of this continuous conflict we are not able to perceive our
spiritual perfection as the ultimate goal. We naturally only see what we
are giving up to achieve the spiritual rather than seeing this as an
investment in our eternal existence. Therefore, Moshe must urge and
encourage us to "choose life" which is not fully appreciated as such. As
physical beings we do not have the natural sensitivity to
spirituality. How does one achieve sensitivity to spirituality thereby
enabled to choose "life"?
We say in the closing blessing of requests in the Amidah (Silent Prayer),
"Hear our voice, Hashem our G-d, pity and be compassionate to us, and
accept- with compassion and favor- our prayer, for G-d Who hears prayers
and supplications are You." It is in this blessing that one usually takes
the opportunity to beseech Hashem for all his material needs. However in
the blessing that precedes the Shema (ahava raba) we beseech Hashem by
saying, "Our Father, the merciful Father, Who acts mercifully, have mercy
upon us, instill in our hearts to understand and elucidate, to listen,
learn, teach, safeguard, perform, and fulfill all the words of Your Torah's
teaching with love." We identify Hashem as the "merciful Father" and then
we beseech Him to open our hearts and eyes to His Torah (which is the
source of our spirituality) as if we are in a life threatening
situation. Why do we beseech Him in such a fervent and intense manner?
It is because only Hashem can assist us to open our hearts and eyes to
appreciate what life truly is. Just as we beseech Him for our personal
needs in the Amidah, we must also sense that same urgency of need regarding
our spirituality. We need His Assistance to give us clarity despite our
natural conflicts of interest towards the physical.
The Gemara in Tractate Makkos states, "On the path that one chooses to
walk, he will be led." If one (G-d forbid) chooses to lead a life of crime
G-d will provide him with many opportunities to do so. On the other hand,
if one truly wishes to lead a spiritual life then Hashem will assist him
because it is his aspiration. Hashem will give him all that is necessary
to be able to recognize "life" to make the proper choice.
4. The Duality of Every Mitzvah
The Torah tells us that during the first day of Chol HaMoed Succos of the
eighth year (the year after the first Shmitta cycle), the entire Jewish
people (men, women, and children) must gather on the Temple Mount to hear
the reading of Mishna Torah (The Book of Devarim) by the King of
Israel. This Positive Commandment is referred to as Hakhail. The Torah
states that the purpose of this reading is," So that they (the Jewish
people) should listen and learn to fear Hashem." The mitzvah of Hakhail is
to listen and understand the Torah, thus giving the Jewish people a sense
of who Hashem is so that they should fear Him. It is evident that the only
way one comes upon the fear of Hashem (yiras shamayim) is through Torah
study. Without the proper Torah study it is not possible to truly fear G-d.
Rabbeinu Yonah explains in his commentary on Pirkei Avos (Ethics of our
Fathers) and in his work Shaarei Teshuvah (Gates of Repentance) that all
mitzvos of the Torah are "parperaos (appetizers)" to yiras shamayim (fear
of heaven). He explains that when a Jew performs mitzvos it is only
because Hashem has commanded him to do so. Thus, every mitzvah action is a
demonstration of one's reverence and fear of Hashem. Without possessing
the knowledge of mitzvos through Torah study one cannot demonstrate his
yiras shamayim through observance. Whenever one performs a mitzvah he is
simultaneously doing two things: the fulfillment of the mitzvah itself and
the mitzvah to fear G-d.
The Navi (Prophet) addresses the issue of mitzvos that are performed by
rote- out of habit without the sense of the mitzvah or its service. If one
is conditioned in the performance of mitzvos and thus only does so out of
habit, he does not have the sense that he is doing them to do the Will of
G-d. The Navi therefore strongly admonishes the Jewish people for
performing mitzvos in this manner. If the Jewish people are performing
their mitzvah obligation, albeit not at an advanced level, why should the
Prophet reprimand them for lack of quality performance? Obviously, it must
be that performing mitzvos in a habitual manner is considered a serious
failing. How do we understanding this?
It is evident from the verse, "So that they (the Jewish people) should
listen and learn to fear Hashem" that one must study Torah in order to
perform mitzvos for their primary purpose, which is an expression of one's
yiras shamayim. The value of the mitzvah itself is secondary. If one
performs a mitzvah by rote, it does not communicate one's yiras shamayim.
Rambam writes in Hilchos Berachos (The Laws of Blessings) that all
blessings are rabbinic enactments, except for the blessing after meals. The
Jew is obliged to recite a blessing before he partakes of food as well as
after he finishes eating. Additionally, there are many other categories of
blessings that one must recite depending on circumstance. Rambam explains
that the reason the Rabbis enacted the continuous opportunity to recite
blessings is to enable the Jew to be cognizant of G-d's Presence throughout
his day and in all of his endeavors.
A Jew must always have a consciousness of Hashem's Presence. As we find
stated in the Gemara in Tractate Berachos, "Whoever benefits from this
world without a blessing, it is considered as if he benefited from
something that was consecrated." If one benefits from a consecrated item
it is considered a serious Torah transgression, which has many
repercussions. The world in its entirety belongs to G-d. As King David
states in Psalms, "The world in its entirety is G-d's." It is only after
one acknowledges that the world is G-d's that he is then permitted to
partake of it.
The only way one can have a continuous sense of G-d's Presence is through
Torah study. This leads to the performance of mitzvos, whose ultimate
purpose is to express one's yiras shamayim.
The following two commentaries have been presented here together as they
both relate to the same topic. #5 is from the previous week while #6 is
new. Both are commentaries on the Portion of Ki Savo
5. Every Day A New Horizon (from Ki Savo)
The Torah states that when one brings the bikkurim, the new fruits and
grains, to the Temple mount he must make a declaration of appreciation
before Hashem. He must say, "I declare (hegaditee) today to Hashem, your
G-d, that I have come to the Land that Hashem swore to our forefathers..."
The declaration, "I declare today...that I have come to the Land..." was
made not only during the first year that the bikkurim were brought (which
was 15 years after entering the Land) but it was continuously declared for
hundreds of years as part of the bikkurim ritual. Despite the fact this
declaration was made for any years and was repeated whenever the bikkurim
were brought, nevertheless it was stated, "I declare (hegaditee) today to
Hashem, your G-d, that I have come to the Land..." How do we understand
this? Secondly, why does the individual begin the declaration with
"hegaditee" (I declare) rather than "amartee" (I say) or "seepartee" (I tell)?
The psalm of Ashrei, is an acrostic of the Hebrew Alphabet. In passage
corresponding to the letter "daled" it reads, "Each generation will praise
Your deeds and of Your mighty deeds they will declare (yageedu)." Malbim
in his commentary on Tehillim explains, "The term "yageedu" is an
expression of haggadah (declaration) that relates to something of value of
which one is not aware." The term "haggadah" is an expression of value and
appreciation for something that was unknown - such as the "mighty deeds" of
Hashem. One may witness and appreciate the "mighty deeds" of Hashem;
however, since they are so great and unfathomable there is always an
element of the unknown.
The Torah tells us that there is a Positive Commandment to communicate to
your child about the bondage and redemption from Egypt. As it is
stated, "V'Hegadditah l'vinchah - You must declare to your children..."
The Torah could have used the term, "You must tell (seeparta) your children
the events of the exodus." Nevertheless, the Torah uses the term of
"haggadah" (declare) to inform us that regardless of how many times one had
related the story of bondage and redemption/ exodus, it must be
communicated as if it were the first time it was told. We read in the
Haggadah that Rabbi Akiva and his collogues were so engrossed in relating
the story of Egypt that they had to be reminded by his students that the
time had come to recite the "Shema of the morning." Because they were
reliving and re-enacting what had transpired in Egypt, it was communicated
as if it were the first time they come upon those observations and
understandings. This is the mitzvah of "V'Hegadditah l'vinchah."
Regarding the "mighty deeds" of Hashem, we speak about the wonders of
existence in a similar vein despite the fact that we have been continuously
exposed and are aware of His ability. Every time we refer to the "mighty
deeds" of Hashem we must speak of them as if they were a first-time
observation because there is always and aspect to them that was not noticed
before.
The declaration of bikkurim is an expression of to G-d for all that He has
done for us. When one receives something of special value for the first
time, one feels great appreciation. However after continuously receiving
the same bounty from G-d one can lose that sense of appreciation because
one no longer sees it as being special. Thus, it becomes something
ordinary and even expected. Therefore, the text of the declaration of
bikkurim is "I declare (hegaditee) today..." Meaning, one's appreciation
is declared every year at the time of the bringing of the new fruits to
express one's appreciation to Hashem as if it was something special that
was received for the first time. The only way one can maintain a continuous
sense of appreciation is to perceive what he receives as something that is
unexpected. Thus, it retains its special status.
When we begin the Amidah (silent prayer) we predicate it on a verse from
Tehillim (Psalms), "Hashem, open my lips and allow my mouth to declare
(yagid) Your praises." There are two difficulties regarding this request of
Dovid HaMelech. Firstly, why does G-d need to give us the ability to speak
if it is already a natural ability of every human being? Secondly, why did
Dovid ask Hashem to give him the ability to "declare (yagid)" the praises
of Hashem and not "tell" or "say" them? Dovid's request to Hashem was not
to give him the ability to speak; but rather, to give him the ability to
recognize the Omnipotence of Hashem so that he could declare "yagid" His
specialness - which are His praises.
We say in the Psalm of the Shabbos, "To declare (l'hagid)Your kindness in
the morning and Your belief at night." Dovid again uses the term
"declare." Every morning when Dovid looked at existence he was overwhelmed
with the specialness of Hashem. Thus, "declaring" His chesed (kindness).
Maharal of Prague in the introduction to Gevuras Hashem explains why he
chose to name his work relating to the exodus from Egypt - "Gevuras
Hashem." He says that it is based on a verse from Tehillim (Psalms), "Who
could utter the power of Hashem, to be able to make tell over all of His
praise..." Dovid could have simply stated "Who could utter the power of
Hashem"? Why does he have to conclude -"to be able to tell over all of His
praise"? The world is so vast and broad that it is not possible for any
human being to be aware of all of the doings of Hashem. One cannot know
every aspect of existence. Even regarding that of which we are aware, it is
not possible to understand the depth of what it is. Thus, Dovid concludes,
"to be able to tell over all of His praise " to indicate that even what we
seem to understand - we truly do not fully grasp.
Life is a continuum of new horizons. Dovid HaMelech experienced every
moment of life as if it were a new experience. Thus he wrote in Psalms,
"Who could utter the power of Hashem, to be able to tell over all of His
praise..." Similarly, the study of Torah is a continuum of new
understanding and appreciation, which brings one to another level of
perceiving Hashem in existence. Despite the fact that one may study the
same Torah subject many times, he must approach it as if it were the first
time because there are always new insights and ways to appreciate the same
subject matter. A Jew can only maintain his enthusiasm and be motivated
in his Judaism if his experience remains invigorating and new.
6. How Must One Stand Before G-d?(from Ki Savo)
When we begin the Amidah (silent prayer) we predicate it on the words of
Dovid HaMelech (Tehillim (Psalms)), "Hashem, open my lips and allow my
mouth to declare (yagid) Your praises." It is difficult to understand the
request of Dovid. Firstly, why is he beseeching Hashem to give him the
ability to speak if this is something that comes naturally to every human
being? Secondly, why does Dovid use the term "declare (yagid)" regarding
the praises of Hashem rather than "tell" or "say"?
The psalm of Ashrei is an acrostic of the Hebrew Alphabet. In the passage,
which corresponds to the letter "daled" Dovid states, "Each generation will
praise Your deeds and of Your mighty deeds they will declare
(yageedu)." Malbim in his commentary on Tehillim explains, "The term
"yageedu" is an expression of haggadah (declaration) that is used to
communicate something of value of which one is not aware." Dovid uses the
term "haggadah" in this particular context to give one the understanding
that the "mighty deeds" of Hashem are something which are unknown. One
may witness and appreciate the "mighty deeds" of G-d; however, since they
are so great and unfathomable there is always an element of the
unknown. Thus, the term "haddadah" has relevance to this context.
The Gemara in Tractate Berachos tells us that when one stands to recite the
Amidah it is as if he is standing before the King (G-d). However the Shema
is a declaration of one's belief in G-d. When one recites the Amidah the
experience must be as if he were having an audience with G-d Himself. When
we stand before Hashem what do we experience? We acknowledge His
Omnipotence, greatness, and beneficence three times every day when we
recite the Amidah. Although intellectually we understand that we are
standing before Hashem, it is very difficult in order to experience and
internalize this reality. How does one who prays regularly maintain a
mindset and a sense of who G-d is when he stands in His presence?
Dovid was not simply requesting that Hashem give him the ability to
speak. Rather, he was asking for the ability to express himself with a
sense of His Omnipotence. Thus, he would be able to declare "yagid," His
specialness, which are His praises. When we say "Hashem, open my lips and
allow my mouth to declare (yagid) Your praises" we are asking Hashem to
assist us in being able to experience the Amidah as if we are standing
before a King. Because the human being is physical in nature, he relates
best to concepts that are tangible or even minimally visible. Since G-d is
infinite, it is not possible to have such an experience with Him. Thus, it
is difficult for one to sense being in His Presence. Dovid therefore
beseeched Hashem to give him the ability to express himself in a way that
was the equivalent of sensing Hashem's Omnipotence," yagid."
In the Shabbos Psalm that we recite, "To declare (l'hagid) Your kindness in
the morning and Your belief in the nights," Dovid again uses the term
"declare." Every morning when Dovid looked at existence he was overwhelmed
with the beneficence of G-d; thus, he "declared" His chesed (kindness).
The commentators explain that "night" refers to exile, which is dark and
replete with confusion. One can only survive unanswered questions if he
has emunah (faith in G-d). The stronger one's faith is the more he will
remain unshaken by the many trials and tribulations of exile. In the
morning when the world is illuminated, things take on a semblance of
clarity. We are taken aback by G-d's creation. This is why Dovid said, "To
declare (l'hagid) Your kindness in the morning." The experience of clarity
that the morning affords must remain vibrant and alive as if it were the
first time.
Every morning upon rising we recite," I gratefully thank you, O living and
eternal King for You returned my soul within me with great compassion -
abundant is Your faithfulness!" Since we offer our thankfulness to Hashem
for allowing us to awaken in the morning "with great compassion" it is
evident that this ability is significant. Although based on his past
record one may not deserve to have his soul restored, nevertheless, one
awakens because of Hashem's great compassion. Do we truly appreciate the
kindness of Hashem which is repeated every day of our lives? Or do we take
it for granted that we will arise from our sleep? If one saves another
from death, that individual would be beholden to his rescuer for the rest
of his life. Identically we must be grateful to G-d for restoring our soul
every morning. We need to experience this as a new opportunity with
infinite value because it gives us the chance to perform mitzvos every
moment of the day.
We must feel fortunate that we were chosen by Hashem to be bearers of His
Torah. As we say every morning, "How fortunate are we because of our
portion and because of our lot." The only way one can continue feeling
fortunate and blessed is to see existence as Dovid HaMelech had expressed
it, "To declare (l'hagid)Your kindness in the morning..."
Copyright © 2003 by Rabbi Yosef Kalatsky and Project Genesis, Inc.
Rabbi Kalatsky is the founder of the Yad Avraham Institute, a New York-based learning center whose mission is to disseminate Torah to Jews of all backgrounds and walks of life.