Hilchot Rechilut Review, Part 2
Thank you to David Solomon for this review
material, which was part of his class for BMT students in Jerusalem in
1993.
- The Prohibition Against Speaking Rechilut
- The Prohibition Against Accepting Rechilut
- Repentance for Speaking or Accepting Rechilut
This is the second of three review classes on Hilchot Rechilut.
Hilchot Rechilut Review: Part 2
It's Rechilut even if:
- it's true
- someone persuaded the speaker to say it
- communicated in a form other than speech (i.e. writing, gestures)
- names are not mentioned (but are easily deduced)
With certain exceptions (most notably an intentional and spiteful sinner) it
does not matter who the subject of the Rechilut is. Even if it's a member of
the speaker's family, the speaker has no special permission to speak against
that person more than any other. Also, speaking against an "am ha'aretz"
(person oblivious to most Torah laws due to limitations of intelligence or
education) is forbidden. It is important to note that speaking against a
Talmid Chacham (Torah scholar) is two offenses in one: speaking Rechilut
against an individual, and speaking Rechilut against the Torah which the
scholar represents.
The audience hearing the Rechilut does not matter; causing ill will against
the subject is forbidden regardless of who feels the ill will against him.
It's important to be careful not to speak Rechilut when trying to straighten
out a problem. For example, if Reuven tells Shimon that Levi called him a
klutz, Shimon can't ask Levi "Why did you call me a klutz?" because Levi
might realize that it was Reuven who repeated it. Also, if two children are
fighting, it might not be a good idea to tell the parents since it could
start a fight between them and not resolve anything. It's important to
review the parameters of speaking Rechilut for a constructive purpose very
carefully before taking action.
It's also important to try to avoid speaking Rechilut when trying to avoid
speaking Rechilut. If Sonny asks Terri, "What did Elise say about me?" and
Terri replies, "I cannot tell you," then Terri has implied that Elise spoke
against Sonny, which is Avak Rechilut. Instead, Terri should try to respond
in a way that doesn't make any implications. If she cannot do this without
lying, she is even permitted to tell an outright lie to avoid stirring up
ill will between Sonny and Elise.
It is forbidden to hear and accept Rechilut, even if:
- the listener has a special relationship to the speaker
- the information is widely publicized
- it is spoken in front of everyone involved
- there is more than one speaker relating the information
- the speaker is speaking in a state of innocence (unaware of the implications
of what he says, which might make it more likely to be believed)
If the information has relevance to the listener, he is permitted to hear
the information but may not accept it as true. He can investigate the
validity of what was said to the extent that it can help protect him or
resolve a situation. When listening, he should indicate to the speaker that
he has a constructive purpose in listening to the information so that the
speaker or any other participants do not assume that they are conducting a
"gossip session."
Like Lashon Hara, repentance for speaking Rechilut involves 2 components:
(1) Repentance Between Man and Fellow Man - If the Rechilut he spoke was
accepted, and especially if the Rechilut caused harm or distress to the
subject, the speaker must ask the subject's forgiveness. If the subject
is unaware of what was done against him, it is prohibited to inform him
since that would cause him grief; instead, the speaker should ask for
forgiveness in a more general way ("I sinned against you").
(2) Repentance Between Man and G-d - Maimonides lists three parts to the
repentance process between man and G-d:
(a) regret for one's actions
(b) private confession to G-d (i.e. in prayer or similar format)
(c) commitment not to repeat the sin in the future
However, this repentance is not complete until repentance between man and
fellow man is completed (if required).
As with any sin between man and fellow man, the sinner should attempt to
make amends. If he spoke Rechilut, he should try to retract what he said
to the original audience (unless, of course, that would further remind the
listener of his dispute or other hateful feelings against the subject).
In the case of accepting Rechilut, the listener should undo the damage in
his mind by convincing himself that the information is not true, or perhaps
by ending his dispute in a respectable way. Someone who accepted Rechilut
but did not speak or encourage it might not have to make any active amends
between man and man other than in his mind; however, if his participation
in a conversation appeared to be an agreement or approval of the Rechilut
spoken, he should retract his agreement (if that can be done without causing
further damage).
HaLashon, Copyright (c) 1996, 2002 by Ellen Solomon and Project Genesis, Inc.