Parshas Emor
Hamaayan / The Torah Spring
Volume XVIII, No. 28
17 Iyar 5764
May 8, 2004
Sponsored by
The Vogel family, in memory of mother and grandmother
Bluma bat Shabtai Hakohen a"h (Blanche Vogel)
The Katz family
on the yahrzeit of Ruchel bat Eliezer Katz a"h
Today's Learning:
Mikvaot 2:1-2
O.C. 204:5-7
Daf Yomi (Bavli): Chullin 106
Daf Yomi (Yerushalmi): Sotah 21
The last part of our parashah tells the story of the blasphemer.
The Torah relates that this individual fought with another Jew and
ended up cursing G-d. Not knowing the punishment for that sin, Bnei
Yisrael placed the blasphemer in custody and sought instructions from
Hashem.
In response, Hashem informed Bnei Yisrael that one who blasphemes
incurs the death penalty. He also taught them the punishments for
killing another person, killing an animal, injuring another person,
and hitting one's parent. R' Eliezer Ashkenazi z"l (1513-1585; rabbi
in Egypt, Italy and Poland) asks: Why did Hashem teach these laws at
this time?
Also, it would seem that it was not necessary for the Torah to
tell us about the fight in which the blasphemer was involved just
before he "blessed G-d," (in the euphemistic language of our Sages).
Why are we being told about his fight?
R' Ashkenazi explains: The Torah wishes to teach us the danger of
becoming angry, and to warn us that particularly when a person is
angry, he must consider the consequences of his actions. What started
as a fight between two Jews ended with one combatant losing control of
himself, cursing G-d, and incurring the death penalty. One who does
not control his anger may kill an animal one day and may kill a person
the next day. Or, he may intend to slap another person lightly and
end up injuring him. An angry person may even go so far as to strike
his parent. This is what the Torah warns us to avoid. (Ma'asei
Hashem)
"He shall not leave the Sanctuary" (21:12)
Literally, this verse is instructing how the Kohen Gadol should
behave when he is in mourning. However, says R' Mendel of Premishlan
z"l (early chassidic leader; 18th century), there is a message here
for every person - "Do not detach yourself from the Holy One. No
matter what you do, your purpose should be to carry out G-d's desire
and not for your personal benefit."
Of course, there are occasions when a person must concentrate on
a mundane activity. What should he do then? Before he begins, he
should expressly think, "I am now leaving home for a short time, but I
plan to return soon."
(Darchei Yesharim)
"Ki tizbechu / when you slaughter a todah / thanksgiving-
offering to Hashem, you shall slaughter it l'rtzonchem /
willingly." (22:29)
R' Hillel Lichtenstein z"l (see page 4) suggests that this verse
can be interpreted in light of Tehilim (50:23), "Zove'ach todah
ye'chabdanani." The literal meaning of that verse is, "One who
sacrifices a thanksgiving offering honors Me"; however, our Sages
interpret it to mean, "One who offers confession honors Me." [The
words "todah" / "thanks and "vidui" / "confession" are closely related
and both have as their root the concept of "acknowledgment."]
Writes R' Lichtenstein: Although G-d accepts repentance at any
time and at any stage of a person's life, we are taught that the
repentance of a youth is more meaningful than the repentance of an
older person. The reason is that the youth has a stronger yetzer hara
and stronger desires. Likewise, repentance undertaken before one is
afflicted with punishments is more meaningful than repentance begun
after one is afflicted with punishments. For this reason, the
repentance of a rich man is more beloved to G-d than the repentance of
one who has lost his riches. Similarly, the repentance of one who is
living peacefully is more beloved than that of one who is plagued with
troubles. In each case, repentance undertaken voluntarily is more
significant than repentance undertaken in response to suffering.
Thus, says our verse (interpreted in the same way Chazal
interpret the verse from Tehilim): "Ki tizbechu todah / when you offer
confession, you shall offer it l'rtzonchem / willingly."
(Maskil El Dal III 7:2)
Pirkei Avot
(Chapter 4)
"Who is strong (`gibor')? One who restrains his [evil]
inclination."
Why is this statement phrased in the present tense? R' Baruch
Hager z"l (the "Seret Rebbe"; died 1965) explains that restraining
one's desires is a constant challenge from which one may never rest.
In fact, notes R' Chaim Meir Hager z"l (the "Vizhnitzer Rebbe" and R'
Baruch's brother), the Torah does not want us to finish the task. The
mishnah does not say, "One who has destroyed his inclination." True,
one must restrain his impulses and evil inclination, but there is a
time to use them as well. In Chazal's words, "Serve Hashem with both
of your inclinations."
(Mi'maayanot Ha'netzach, p.195)
"Rabbi Meir said: `Minimize your involvement in commerce
("esek") and study Torah'."
R' Avraham Pinso z"l of Sarajevo writes: This can be understood
in light of the gemara (Avodah Zarah 19b) which promises that if one
studies Torah with the proper intentions, his investments will prosper
on their own. It does appear superficially that this is not the case,
but we cannot gage a person's inner motivations, and we therefore do
not know whether he really deserves this blessing. Also, a person may
study Torah with the purest of intentions, but forfeit this promise
because of his sins. This is the likely explanation any time we see
that a promise of the Torah is not fulfilled.
(Katit La'maor)
"Do not focus on the pitcher but on its contents."
R' Pinso writes: This is an allusion to the yetzer hara, the evil
inclination. It looks like an earthenware jar, something of little
value. In fact, however, it is filled with the sweetest wine. How
so?
We think of the yetzer hara as a pest. We are constantly
fighting with the yetzer hara, trying to do good and to please Hashem.
For doing so, we earn our places in the World-to-Come. But without
the challenge which the yetzer hara presents, we would never earn that
reward.
(Ibid)
"Rabbi Shimon says, `There are three crowns--the crown of
Torah, the crown of royalty, and the crown of the priesthood-
-and the crown of a good name is above all of them'."
Then aren't there four crowns? asks Rav Nachum Mordechai Friedman
z"l (the "Tchortkover Rebbe"). He explains that the "crown of a good
name" is not a separate distinction, but is the "crown jewel" of the
other crowns. All of the Torah, royalty, and priestliness in the
world are worthless if their master does not earn a good name as well.
(Doreish Tov p. 197)
R' Hillel Lichtenstein z"l
R' Hillel Lichtenstein was born on 11 Kislev 5575 / 1814 near
Pressburg (present-day Bratislava, Slovakia), and he became one of the
leading students of the rabbi of Pressburg, R' Moshe Sofer (the Chatam
Sofer). After his marriage, R' Lichtenstein studied in Galante,
Hungary.
R' Lichtenstein began his rabbinic career in 1846, first as rabbi
of Margareten, Hungary, then as rabbi of Klausenberg (today, Cluj,
Romania), and later, back in Margareten. Eventually, he became rabbi
of Kolmyya, Galicia (today in Ukraine), the town with which he is most
closely associated. While in Margareten, R' Lichtenstein began to
visit R' Chaim Halberstam, the Zanzer Rebbe. Although not from a
chassidic background himself, R' Lichtenstein eventually began to act
as a chassidic rebbe. Many chassidim gathered around him and he
accepted kvitlach / notes with requests from them in the manner of a
rebbe.
R' Lichtenstein was active in the affairs of the broader Jewish
community beyond just the towns in which he served. While in Hungary,
he was one of the founders of the "Orthodox Congress," an umbrella
group of Jewish congregations. After moving to Galicia, he joined
with R' Shimon Sofer (his teacher's son) to found a similar
organization, "Machzikei Ha'dat." R' Lichtenstein was a popular
speaker and he frequently traveled from town to town trying to
strengthen Torah observance. He was also among the fiercest opponents
of the Haskalah, the so-called "Enlightenment" movement.
R' Lichtenstein was a strong supporter of settlement in Eretz
Yisrael, and he helped his son-in-law, R' Akiva Yosef Schlesinger, buy
up land for what became the city of Petach Tikva. R' Lichtenstein
himself died in Kolomyya on 10 Iyar 5651 / 1891 and is buried there.
In addition to leaving many descendants, R' Lichtenstein wrote
numerous books including Avkat Rochel (mussar), Bet Hillel (letters
regarding strengthening observance), Maskil El Dal (derashot),
Teshuvot Bet Hillel (responsa), and others. (Source: Encyclopedia
L'Chassidut).
Copyright © 2004 by Shlomo Katz
and Torah.org.
The editors hope these brief 'snippets' will engender further study
and discussion of Torah topics ('lehagdil Torah u'leha'adirah'), and
your letters are appreciated. Web archives at Torah.org start with 5758 (1997) and
may be retrieved from the Hamaayan page.
Text archives from 1990 through the present may be retrieved from http://www.acoast.com/~sehc/hamaayan/.
Hamaayan needs your support! Please consider sponsoring Hamaayan in honor of a happy occasion or in memory of a loved one. Did you know that the low cost of sponsorship - only $18 - has not changed in seventeen years? Donations to HaMaayan are tax-deductible.