A significant part of this week’s parashah is devoted to listing or
describing the animals, birds and fish which are or are not kosher. The
parashah concludes: “To distinguish between the contaminated and the pure,
and between the living thing that may be consumed and the living thing that
may not be consumed.” R’ Moshe Yehoshua Hager z”l (1916-2012; Vizhnitzer
Rebbe) asks: For the sake of parallelism, shouldn’t the second half of the
verse have been reversed--“the living thing that may not be consumed”
paralleling “contaminated” and “the living thing that may be consumed”
paralleling “pure”? [As written, the pasuk seems to have the pattern
A-B-B-A instead of A-B-A-B.]
R’ Hager explains: In addition to its literal, halachic meaning, the verse
may be interpreted as follows [giving it an A-B-A-B pattern]: Who is
contaminated? One whose life force is derived from consumable belongings.
Who is pure? One whose life force is not derived from consumable
belongings, but rather from spiritual acquisitions.
In this light, he continues, we can understand the mishnah (Avot, ch. 4):
“Against your will, you are alive.” Who is truly alive? One who approaches
material pleasures unwillingly.
R’ Hager adds (in the name of R’ Mordechai Chune Fuchs, a famous chassid of
R’ Hager’s grandfather): Some people are alive, while other seemingly
living people merely exist. An example of the latter is one who is most
alert when sitting in front food, but who consistently nods off during
prayers. A truly living person is one who has his priorities in order.
(Kuntreis Sichot U’maamarei Kodesh 5732-5734, p.64)
“Moshe said to Aharon: Of this did Hashem speak, saying, ‘I will be
sanctified through those who are nearest Me, thus I will be honored before
the entire people’.” (10:3)
R’ Yaakov Kranz z”l (1741-1804; the Dubno Maggid) explains that this verse
contrasts Hashem’s expectations of the righteous with His expectations of
the “ordinary” Jew. Those closest to Hashem are held to a standard that
measures whether they sanctify Him through every deed; if they do not, they
are judged harshly, as Aharon’s sons Nadav and Avihu were. In contrast,
“ordinary” Jews are measured by whether they honor Hashem by adhering, at a
minimum, to the letter of the law.
R’ Kranz explains further that there are three reasons for why G-d holds the
righteous to exacting standards. The first may be understood by means of a
parable: Two subjects of a king committed the same offense against their
ruler. One offender was a peasant while the other was one of the king’s
advisors. Wouldn’t we expect the king to judge his advisor more harshly,
because the advisor should have had a greater reverence for the king after
being granted access to the throne? Similarly, one who has been blessed
with closeness to Hashem is held to a higher standard than is one who is
distant from Hashem.
Second, one who is close to Hashem is viewed by others as a role model.
When he sins, he not only violates the law, he causes others to do so. This
is not true when an “ordinary” Jew sins.
Third, R’ Kranz writes, not all neshamot / souls originate from the same
“level.” Those that come from a higher source are more delicate,
so-to-speak. Therefore, they are more prone to being damaged by even minor
sins, just as a delicate piece of equipment is more susceptible to damage
from minute dust particles and just as a white garment is more susceptible
to permanent damage from small stains. This is alluded to by the verse
(Kohelet 1:18), “For with much wisdom comes much grief, and he who increases
knowledge increases pain.” (Sefer Ha’middot: Sha’ar Ha’yirah chapter 12)
Also from the Dubno Maggid:
“Do not drink intoxicating wine, you and your sons with you, when you
come to the Ohel Mo’ed / Tent of Meeting . . .” (10:9)
The Bet Hamikdash was the paragon of beauty, a joy to the whole world
(paraphrasing Eichah 2:15). A kohen who drinks wine before entering the
Temple acts as if he needs an external stimulus – a foreign fire – to kindle
joy in his heart when performing the sacred service. According to the
Talmudic sage Rabbi Yishmael, this was the sin of Aharon’s sons, Nadav and
Avihu. (Kol Rinah Vy’shuah to Esther 1:10-12)
The following is a letter written by R’ Eliyahu Eliezer Dessler z”l
(1892-1953; rosh kollel in Gateshead, England, and mashgiach ruchani in the
Ponovezh Yeshiva in Bnei Brak) to an unidentified recipient. It is printed
in Michtav M’Eliyahu: Kovetz Igrot, p.129.
I received your precious letter with your invitation to come visit you and
to participate in the Pesach Seder with you. Thank you very much for your
invitation. However, I am unable to accept it. With G-d’s help, I will
celebrate the holy festival and arrange the Seder where I live.
It would seem that, just as it is impossible to invite a ben Torah [loosely
translated: “one whose values are derived from the Torah”] to visit a friend
for the Ne’ilah prayer on Yom Kippur, so, it seems to me, it is impossible
to make a “visit” out of the holy Seder. [The Seder is an occasion to
internalize, not a time to be outward-looking.] Fortunate is one who
focuses and arranges the Seder within his heart. The Exodus is the source
of the Jewishness within us. The Seder must make a convert of our inner
selves, which have left their original domain and become animal-like,
grossly material. More than that, our inner selves have ceased being
Jewish. Woe to our hearts that are lost within our inner selves.
A related thought:
R’ Shalom Noach Berezovsky z”l (1911-1980; Slonimer Rebbe in Yerushalayim)
writes: As applied to some people, the title “Jew” is no more than an
accident of birth. Such a person’s Jewishness is not part of his essence;
though he fulfills all of the mitzvot, he is doing nothing more than
“acting” Jewish. To really be a Jew means that one’s Jewishness is embedded
in the essence of his being, in his innards, his mind, his heart, and all
his limbs. We read in Megillat Esther [about Mordechai], “There was a
Jewish man . . .” [instead of, “There was a Jew”]. His whole personality
was Jewish--his beliefs and his outlooks were Jewish, his feelings and
aspirations were Jewish; even his physical desires were Jewish, i.e., they
were under his control. We read (Vayikra 18:3), “Like the deed of the land
of Egypt in which you dwelled--you shall not do, and like the deed of the
land of Canaan to which I bring you--you shall not do, and do not follow
their traditions.” This means that those things which you are permitted to
do, you should not do the way an Egyptian or Canaanite would do them.
A true expression of these feelings can be found in the journal entry that
the Piaseczna Rebbe Hy”d [R’ Klonimus Kalman Shapira z”l; 1889-1943] wrote
upon turning 40: “What can I accept upon myself? To study more? I believe
that I don’t waste any time currently. To distance myself from physical
desires? Thank G-d, I’m not subjugated to them, G-d forbid. What is
lacking in me? Simply to be Jewish. I appear to myself to be a perfectly
painted picture of a human being, which lacks only a soul.” [The Slonimer
Rebbe continues:] Tzaddikim say that when one recites the blessing, “He did
not make me a gentile,” he must examine himself to see whether any part of
himself is in fact gentile-like. (Netivot Shalom, Vol. I p.18)
R’ Yaakov Emden (1697-1776) is well-known for his notes on the Talmud,
his halachic writings, and his siddur commentary. One of R’ Emden’s lesser
known works is his autobiography, Megilat Sefer. In this selection, R’
Emden explains what compelled him to write an autobiography.
Before I begin to tell the story of what happened to me, I will declare
truthfully that I have not done this to publicize myself and my praises, for
I know that I am lacking good deeds--devoid of Torah, devoid of wisdom,
devoid of greatness with which to glorify myself. Would that my writing not
reveal my shortcomings! However, those who know me know that I have chosen
the path of humility for, since the day that I have attained understanding,
I have recognized my own worth and blemishes. Therefore, it doesn’t matter
to me [if my writing reveals my shortcomings], for I love only the truth.
There are three reasons why I have arrived at this point, i.e., to write an
autobiography. [First,] I don’t want to refrain from informing my
descendants all of my affairs to the extent possible (and, if I can’t tell
all, then at least what I remember at the moment). [Second,] the strongest
reason that led me to this is to reveal Hashem’s kindness to me since my
youth. Though many have persecuted me, they have been unable to defeat me.
If it could all be described, it would not be believed that a person could
suffer one-thousandth of what I have undergone . . . From all of them,
Hashem saved me . . . The numerous wonders that He did for me, the lowly
among the thousands of Israel, I wish to reveal to later generations.
Third, [my intention is] so that the light of my guiltlessness will shine
like the sun and I will not remain under a cloud [in the face of] “the
lawless who have robbed me; they now surround me as my enemies in their very
souls” [paraphrasing Tehilim 17:9], slandering me to humiliate me in the
eyes of the inhabitants of the land. They wish to destroy me with the
curses in their hands, with their lies that have been disseminated in every
corner. There is no doubt that the publications containing their attacks
will remain in the world for some time. [Ed. note: Such pamphlets still
exist.] Therefore, of necessity, I must clarify my deeds before G-d and man.
The editors hope these brief 'snippets' will engender further study
and discussion of Torah topics ('lehagdil Torah u'leha'adirah'), and
your letters are appreciated. Web archives at Torah.org start with 5758 (1997) and
may be retrieved from the Hamaayan page.
Hamaayan needs your support! Please consider sponsoring Hamaayan in honor of a happy occasion or in memory of a loved one. The low cost of sponsorship is $36. Donations to HaMaayan are tax-deductible.