Torah.org Home Subscribe Services Support Us
 
Print Version

Email this article to a friend

The Punishment Fits The Crime

By Rabbi Daniel Travis

Sarah was afraid, and she denied having laughed, saying, “I did not laugh.” (Bereshith 18:15)

Our Sages taught that all punishment is meted out “measure for measure,” in accordance with the transgression. This principle is crucial to the ultimate rectification of each individual and the world at large, for appropriate reproof teaches the transgressor what he did to have brought such a punishment upon himself. In this way he will be moved to repent, and will be less likely to repeat that sin in the future.

Examining the punishment for any given act can give us a clue as to the severity of the act itself. Since Sarah had lied about her reaction to the news of the future birth of her son Yitzchak, she died – years later – when she discovered that Yitzchak had been taken to be a sacrifice(1).

If we tend to view Sarah’s punishment as overly harsh, it is because we do not understand the importance of truth. The Hebrew word for “truth” is emeth, a three-letter word which, the Sages have explained, can be divided into two parts: the letter Aleph (E), and the word meth (meaning “dead”). Someone who deviates one iota from the truth (this is represented by the letter Aleph, whose numerical equivalent is one) is considered to be a meth (dead person). Sarah was exceptionally righteous, and her every action was subject to God’s close scrutiny, so in her case, death that resulted from uttering an untruth was very plausible.

Another example of measure-for-measure punishment meted out for falsehood concerned Yaakov and his son Yehudah. After Yosef was sold, Yehudah dipped Yosef’s coat in goat’s blood, and brought it to their father Yaakov, telling him, “Please identify this” (3). With these words Yehudah gave the false impression that he did not know what had happened to Yosef. Although he had uttered no lie, his words were far from truthful. Yehudah was later humiliated by his daughter-in-law Tamar, when she spoke these very same words(4). Furthermore, since he deceived his father with a goat, Tamar deceived him with a goat (5).


1. Me’am Lo’ez, Bereshith 23:1.

2. Maharal, Nethiv HaEmeth, Ch. 1.

3. Bereshith 37:32.

4. Da’as Zekeinim, Bereshith 38:25.

5. Rashi on Bereshith 38:23.


Text Copyright © 2006 by Rabbi Daniel Travis and Torah.org

Please Support TORAH.ORG
Print Version       Email this article to a friend

 

ARTICLES ON BAMIDBAR AND SHAVUOS:

View Complete List

Torah Study - Pleasure or Responsibility
Rabbi Eliyahu Hoffmann - 5763

It's Not What, But Why - Part I
Rabbi Aron Tendler - 5766

H-E-C-T-I-C
Rabbi Yisroel Ciner - 5765

> Shavuos and Bar Mitzvah
Rabbi Yehudah Prero - 5757

To Be Perfectly Honest
Rabbi Eliyahu Hoffmann - 5764

Numbers Game
Rabbi Mordechai Kamenetzky - 5759

Frumster - Orthodox Jewish Dating

Bamidbar Before Shavuos
Shlomo Katz - 5764

The Giving of the Torah
Dr. Meir Tamari - 5762

G-d Doesn't Count Jews
Rabbi Label Lam - 5763

> To Be Amongst The Counted
Rabbi Yisroel Ciner - 5758

Torah-Like Water
Rabbi Label Lam - 5770

Numbered for Redemption
Rabbi Pinchas Winston - 5771

Twins - People, United
Rabbi Yehudah Prero - 5764

Fatherly Guidance
Rabbi Label Lam - 5771

What's For Desert?
Rabbi Pinchas Winston - 5766

Receivers of Torah Knowledge
Rabbi Pinchas Winston - 5772



Project Genesis

Torah.org Home


Torah Portion

Jewish Law

Ethics

Texts

Learn the Basics

Seasons

Features

TORAHAUDIO

Ask The Rabbi

Knowledge Base




Help

About Us

Contact Us



Free Book on Geulah!




Torah.org Home
Torah.org HomeCapalon.com Copyright Information