Home Subscribe Services Support Us
Print Version

Email this article to a friend

Ki Sisa

by Rabbi Yaakov Menken

"Moshe stood in the gate of the camp, and he said, 'whomever is for G-d, let him come to me,' and all the children [tribe] of Levi gathered around him." [32:26]

There is a Medrash that asks an obvious question: who wouldn't want to be for HaShem? "Who doesn't want to be a member of the king's household?" But Moshe only allowed those who had not given their gold to create the Golden Calf to gather around him. "Whomever is for G-d," meaning only for G-d without including idol-worship as well.

The Chofetz Chaim says that we can take a truly profound lesson from this. Sometimes we need to realize that compromise is crucial for harmony at home, makes peace, and is good for political life - but deadly where matters of principle are concerned. One cannot "compromise" with idolatry and evil.

It is almost guaranteed - whenever a person decides to take a step forward towards G-d and moral conduct, the next day someone or something will require a little "flexibility." This is a test of your "emergency response system:" do you have principles, or guidelines subject to change without notice? Do you follow Ten Commandments, or look up to Ten Nice Ideas?

The Chofetz Chaim goes on to explain that Eliyahu issued this challenge in Kings I 18:21 [idiomatic translation]: "until when will you continue to straddle both sides of the fence?" Eliyahu told the people to make the decision: whose side are you on? Do you worship G-d, or the idol Ba'al?

Eliyahu continues, "if HaShem is G-d, then go after him, and if the Ba'al, then follow him." He seems to say that fence-straddling is worse than pure idolatry - and the Chofetz Chaim concludes that this is very much the case. The fence-straddlers send the message that it is OK to sometimes go to the Ba'al, whereas if they would always go to the Ba'al, then everyone would know that they were idol-worshippers rather than followers of the G-d of Israel, and people would withdraw themselves from them.

At times, we must make a choice, and this goes well beyond whether we can "import" Buddhist meditation into Judaism. If we have principles, and then demonstrate "flexibility" where they are concerned, we send a message that we lack sincerity in our overall convictions. Even becoming angry or defensive shows that one is considering the alternative. A calm denial is not "intransigence," but a demonstration that principles are not for sale.



View Complete List

Living Forever
Shlomo Katz - 5760

Know that you Know Nothing
Shlomo Katz - 5755

This Rashi Is Not For the United Nations It is For Us
- 5769

Looking for a Chavrusah?

A Mate, not a Maid!
Rabbi Yissocher Frand - 5756

Genesis and Life
Rabbi Berel Wein - 5765

What Ends Must Have Begun!
Shlomo Katz - 5773

> To Learn and to Teach
Rabbi Aron Tendler - 5763

Fonzie & the Happy Days of Rest
Jon Erlbaum - 0

Either You're With Us, Or...
Rabbi Dovid Green - 5762


Great Expectations
Rabbi Yochanan Zweig - 5770

It Was a Misunderstanding...
Rabbi Yisroel Ciner - 5759

Understanding Creation
Shlomo Katz - 5765

Frumster - Orthodox Jewish Dating

More than One G-d?
Rabbi Yaakov Menken - 5761

Chochmah, Tevunah, and Daat
Shlomo Katz - 5769

The Delayed "Ki Tov"
Rabbi Yissocher Frand - 5762

A Walk in the Garden
Rabbi Aron Tendler - 5759

Project Genesis Home

Torah Portion

Jewish Law



Learn the Basics




Ask The Rabbi

Knowledge Base


About Us

Contact Us

Free Book on Geulah! Home Copyright Information