Torah.org Home Subscribe Services Support Us
  LifeLine
Print Version

Email this article to a friend

Ki Sisa

by Rabbi Yaakov Menken


"Moshe stood in the gate of the camp, and he said, 'whomever is for G-d, let him come to me,' and all the children [tribe] of Levi gathered around him." [32:26]

There is a Medrash that asks an obvious question: who wouldn't want to be for HaShem? "Who doesn't want to be a member of the king's household?" But Moshe only allowed those who had not given their gold to create the Golden Calf to gather around him. "Whomever is for G-d," meaning only for G-d without including idol-worship as well.

The Chofetz Chaim says that we can take a truly profound lesson from this. Sometimes we need to realize that compromise is crucial for harmony at home, makes peace, and is good for political life - but deadly where matters of principle are concerned. One cannot "compromise" with idolatry and evil.

It is almost guaranteed - whenever a person decides to take a step forward towards G-d and moral conduct, the next day someone or something will require a little "flexibility." This is a test of your "emergency response system:" do you have principles, or guidelines subject to change without notice? Do you follow Ten Commandments, or look up to Ten Nice Ideas?

The Chofetz Chaim goes on to explain that Eliyahu issued this challenge in Kings I 18:21 [idiomatic translation]: "until when will you continue to straddle both sides of the fence?" Eliyahu told the people to make the decision: whose side are you on? Do you worship G-d, or the idol Ba'al?

Eliyahu continues, "if HaShem is G-d, then go after him, and if the Ba'al, then follow him." He seems to say that fence-straddling is worse than pure idolatry - and the Chofetz Chaim concludes that this is very much the case. The fence-straddlers send the message that it is OK to sometimes go to the Ba'al, whereas if they would always go to the Ba'al, then everyone would know that they were idol-worshippers rather than followers of the G-d of Israel, and people would withdraw themselves from them.

At times, we must make a choice, and this goes well beyond whether we can "import" Buddhist meditation into Judaism. If we have principles, and then demonstrate "flexibility" where they are concerned, we send a message that we lack sincerity in our overall convictions. Even becoming angry or defensive shows that one is considering the alternative. A calm denial is not "intransigence," but a demonstration that principles are not for sale.


 






ARTICLES ON TOLDOS:

View Complete List

G-d in the Numbers
Rabbi Yaakov Menken - 5764

Murder: Going for the Kill
Rabbi Osher Chaim Levene - 5766

Heaven on Earth
Rabbi Yisroel Ciner - 5758

ArtScroll

Look, Twins!
Rabbi Pinchas Winston - 5763

Game Theory - Respectful Rebuke
Rabbi Eliyahu Hoffmann - 5763

I Shall Move the World!
Rabbi Label Lam - 5772

Frumster - Orthodox Jewish Dating

We Have No 'Rights'
Rabbi Yaakov Menken - 5760

From Soup to Nuts
Rabbi Mordechai Kamenetzky - 5759

Sour Lentils
Rabbi Mordechai Kamenetzky - 5756

Looking for a Chavrusah?

Surprise, Surprise!
Rabbi Dovid Green - 5762

A Question of Honor
Rabbi Naftali Reich - 5767

A Father's Plan
Shlomo Katz - 5772

> Fathers and Sons
Shlomo Katz - 5768

At Least We Should Try To Act Like Eisav!
Rabbi Yissocher Frand - 5764

Yaakov and Eisav Go Separate Ways
Rabbi Pinchas Winston - 5770

One Cannot Make Blanket Rules Concerning Telling The Truth
Rabbi Yissocher Frand - 5773



Project Genesis

Torah.org Home


Torah Portion

Jewish Law

Ethics

Texts

Learn the Basics

Seasons

Features

TORAHAUDIO

Ask The Rabbi

Knowledge Base




Help

About Us

Contact Us



Free Book on Geulah!




Torah.org Home
Torah.org HomeCapalon.com Copyright Information