by Rabbi Yaakov Menken
In last week's reading, we learned that the shepherds of Avraham and Lot
were arguing - and that eventually Avraham suggested to Lot that they part
ways, and permitted Lot to choose the direction. The Torah tells us that
Lot looked around, and realized that the Jordan Valley was extraordinarily
fertile. Therefore he went there, while Avraham settled in Kenaan.
The Midrash tells us that the Torah is only offering us Lot's "surface"
reasoning. Why did Lot actually choose to go to that valley? In order that
he should set up tents reaching as far as S'dom - where "the people of
S'dom were truly wicked and sinful to G-d." [13:13] This was true even
though Lot would not participate in their behavior - he was still drawn to
it. Although he justified his behavior (even to himself) by looking at the
fertile Jordan Valley, the real attraction was the immorality that
permeated S'dom and the nearby cities.
This week, we see the truth come to light. After the destruction of S'dom,
Lot's daughters conclude that all mankind has again been destroyed (similar
to the flood of Noach), and that it is incumbent upon them to continue the
species with the only remaining man. Knowing that Lot would never permit
such an act, they give him wine - and two nations emerge, letting Lot's
inner nature be known for all time.
[If he was drunk, how do we know that this was indeed his nature? Rabbi
Shlomo Yitzhaki (Rashi, 19:33) explains that Lot realized on the following
morning what his eldest daughter had done, but nonetheless permitted
himself to become drunk that evening as well.]
There is a relevant story about the Alter of Slabodka (Alter - old man,
sage), who once needed to travel to Koenigsburg for an eye operation. When
he returned, someone asked him where he had been, and why he went. His
reply? He went to Koenigsburg, to see a push-button umbrella.
An umbrella? Didn't he go for an operation?
Well, yes - but the Alter was searching his subconscious. The doctor had
told him of two hospitals capable of performing the necessary operation,
they had gone through all the plusses and minuses of each location - and
eventually they came to a rational decision.
Even so, the Alter had once before travelled through Koenigsburg. Looking
out from his train, he had seen a man operate a push-button umbrella - and
in that era, this apparently represented a technological innovation as
exciting as Windows ME. So the Alter wondered - how much did that umbrella
bias my thinking? Is it possible that I chose a hospital based on the
chance to have such an umbrella?
All too often, we do just this - and refuse to admit it. Worse, we make our
decisions without any careful thought, without a rational basis, and we
still refuse to admit our biases. Is this rational?
Perhaps we are fooling no one but ourselves - and who would want to be so
[Heard from: Rabbi Asher Z. Rubenstein, Jerusalem]
Rabbi Yaakov Menken