Chapter 2: Mishna 1: Part 2
Rebbe says: Which is a straight path that a person should
choose? One that is both praiseworthy for the doer and
praiseworthy from other people. And be [as] careful with a
"light" Mitzvah as with a weighty one, for you don't know
the reward given for [each of the] Mitzvoth. And calculate
the cost of a Mitzvah against its reward; and the reward of
a sin against its cost. And look at (scrutinize) three
things, and you will not come to the hands of sin. Know
what is above you: An eye which sees, an ear which hears,
and all your actions are written in a book.
Why did Rebbe use the adjective "straight" while Rebbe Yochanan
ben Zakkai (Mishna 9) used the adjective "good?" In discussing the
perception of people, "straight" is the appropriate adjective. This is
reflected in Rashi's commentary of the phrase (Deveraim 12:28) "...the
good and the straight" where he writes: "Good -- in the eyes of heaven;
straight -- in the eyes of man." And it is the opinion of Rebbe Akiva
(in the Sifrei, Devarim 12) who explains the verse in this way. This
is because straight and crooked can be perceived by the human being
(see our explanation of "straight" at the end of last week's shiur)
through the human power of perception and vision. "Good," however, is
not something always apparent through human perception. It may appear
to be good, when in fact it is bad. (See our explanation of "tov" and
"rah" in Ch. 1, Mishna 2, pt. 2; DC1_022.) Therefore, Rebbe speaks of
a Straight path as being one that is judged by the perception of
people, and is Chosen, on the basis of those perceptions, distinguished
by man from the warped path. Rebbe Yochanan ben Zakkai speaks of a
GOOD path, to which a person Attaches himself, since it exists as an
objective reality outside of man.
The next part of the Mishna shifts from third person ("which is
the path A Person should choose") to second person ("You should be
careful...") in order to communicate a significant distinction between
the two lessons being taught. Choosing a path is legitimate in
character traits (and one's general approach to Judaism) for in this
area there is no single objective standard. The individual Chooses the
path, and the criteria are that the path should be appropriate both for
the doer and for those around him. But this does not extend to the
area of Mitzvah observance, and being equally meticulous about all
Mitzvoth is not simply the choice of a straight path. It is an
objective Torah requirement that a person be as careful with a "light"
Mitzvah as with a "heavy" one. Hence, the instruction addressed
directly to the individual.
Yet Rebbe did juxtapose the two lessons, for he was teaching
comprehensive behavior in both the area of "midoth" (perfection of
personality traits) and "Mitzvoth." First, we are taught the proper
approach to character development, for "derech eretz kadma la'Torah,"
the requirement for proper worldly behavior preceded the Torah (as we
discussed in the Introduction). This is the lesson of choosing a
straight path, which encompasses man's character traits. Then we are
taught a lesson about keeping the Torah and its commandments, with the
instruction to be as careful with "light" Mitzvoth as with "heavy"
There are those that raise the following question on this Mishna.
How can Rebbe teach us that all the Mitzvoth are to be treated equally
when we see that the Torah itself has a hierarchy in the performance of
Mitzvoth! There are times when one Mitzvah pushes off another!? For
example, the commandment to ensure the proper burial of a corpse
overrides even the commandments of Brith Milah or the Pesach sacrifice
(the most severe positive commands, whose non-performance brings with
it "kareth") when only one can be performed. But this question is not
in place, for our Mishna is discussing the reward received for each
Mitzvah (and in this area we have no accurate knowledge of the reward
hierarchy). It is possible that in comparing a person who attended to
the burial of corpse with a person who brought a Pesach sacrifice, the
latter will receive a greater reward than the former. The Torah did
not have the burial override the sacrifice due to the greater reward of
the burial, for the preference in performance is not based on
maximizing man's reward. Rather, the will of the Torah (the decree of
G-d) is that when only one of the two can be performed, there is a
preference for the burial over the Pesach sacrifice. G-d's primary
desire is that the corpse should be brought to a proper burial under
all circumstances. Under circumstances where only one of the two
Mitzvoth could be performed, a person who abandoned the burial to
sacrifice the Pesach or to perform circumcision (in the quest for the
greater reward, even if it would be known that this brought greater
reward) would be violating the Divine will in his act of sacrificing
the Pesach (since G-d wanted that person under those circumstances to
be involved in burial) and in fact he would get no reward.
(This is anticipating a famous saying of the Rebbe from Kotzk: A
person is supposed to view every situation with the realization that
there is only one Jew, one time, and one Mitzvah. The person is that
individual, the time is now, and the Mitzvah is precisely what G-d
wants from that individual at that time.)
In fact, the language of the Tanna itself demonstrates that there
is a hierarchy in the performance of Mitzvoth, with one having the
ability to override another. Calling one Mitzvah "kala" (light)
indicates that it can be pushed off by a heavier ("chamura") one! But
this known relativity is only in relation to the ability of one to
override the other, in a situation where there is a simultaneous
conflict. (Only one can be performed, and the other must be
forfeited.) This choice of one over the other reflects the will of G-d
as to which Mitzvah should be performed when both can't be done, but
has nothing to do with the relative rewards of the two Mitzvoth.
From this foundation, Rebbe teaches that a person should not be
lax in the "light" Mitzvah which could get pushed off, thinking that it
has little reward, so he is bette off saving his energy and greater
resources for the "heavy" Mitzvah, which carries with it more reward.
(A kind of "cost/benefit" analysis...) This calculation would be
flawed, since it is possible for the lighter Mitzvah to have a reward
equal to the heavier one. Therefore, one should be equally careful with
each and every Mitzvah that presents itself.
The class is taught by Rabbi Shaya Karlinsky,
Dean of Darche Noam Institutions, Yeshivat
Darche Noam/Shapell's and Midreshet Rachel for Women.
TZAV AND PURIM:
Lots More To The Story
Rabbi Yochanan Zweig - 5773
Where There's A Will...
Rabbi Pinchas Winston - 5766
Rabbi Mordechai Kamenetzky - 5758
Rabbi Pinchas Winston - 5761
Tzivanu Applies Today
Rabbi Berel Wein - 5772
The story of Adam and adam
Shlomo Katz - 5772
Rabbi Naftali Reich - 5768
One Time, or Always?
Rabbi Yisroel Ciner - 5760
Fear of What?
Rabbi Label Lam - 5766
Perspectives on Trouble
Rabbi Dovid Green - 5758
Room for a Broom
Rabbi Mordechai Kamenetzky - 5757
I Know One!
Rabbi Label Lam - 5773
The Secret of Mordechai's Success
Rabbi Yehudah Prero - 5762
Parashas Zochor: Doomsday Amalek
Rabbi Osher Chaim Levene - 5768
A Loss of Money
Rabbi Chaim Flom - 5768
Preparation for Happiness
Rabbi Yehudah Prero - 5769