Parshas Vayikra
The Many Nuances of Sin
The K'li Yakar says we can glean some enlightening ideas by carefully
examining the words the Torah uses when describing different korbanos
chatas (sin-offerings).
Towards the end of parshas Vayikra we learn the halachos (laws) of the sin-
offering, which was different depending on who sinned – a regular Jew, a
king, and the Kohen Gadol (High Priest). Describing the sin of a regular
Jew, the Torah says (4:2) When [Ki] a person sins… By a king, it says
(4:22) When [Asher] a ruler sins… And with regard to a Kohen Gadol, the
Torah writes (4:3) If [Im] the anointed Kohen sins…
All three variations mean essentially the same thing – if or when
something occurs – and to a large extent are used interchangeably by the
Torah. Still, every word and nuance of the Torah holds untold
significance, all the more so here where the Torah uses three different
words that all mean the same thing in a very short span describing
identical acts.
Mefarshim write, he says, that the three variations of if/when connote
three different levels of likelihood: asher is the most likely (this will
happen), followed by ki, and then im (if).
By yet another korban, known as the par he'lam davar shel tzibbur (4:13-21
which is brought when the majority of the nation accidentally commits a
specific sin due to a mistaken ruling by the Sanhedrin [High Court]), the
Torah also begins with im – if, indicating unlikelihood. It is uncommon
for such a thing to happen.
Likewise, regarding the sin-offering of the Kohen Gadol, the Torah begins
with im. This is the spiritual leader of K'lal Yisrael. His life, by
definition, is dedicated to serving Hashem, to which he spends the bulk of
his time in the Beis Ha-mikdash [the Holy Temple], surrounded by kohanim
and levi'im performing the holy service, and steeped in ritual, halacha,
and spirituality. That such a person in such an environment would sin (a
sin offering is brought for inadvertent transgression of a serious matter
such as one who mistakenly ate non-kosher meat or forgot it was Shabbos
and did work) is surprising (and disturbing) – the Torah rates it as least
likely, so to speak.
The sin of the individual, the regular Yid, is more common – it is
described with the more likely ki: this will likely happen.
The sin of the king, says the K'li Yakar, begins with asher, when. There
is no question, he says, that a person who has been elevated to such a
high position will at some point fall prey to the vices of power and
arrogance.
By definition, the king was supposed to cast fear among his subjects and
serve as a symbol of honor and splendor. His dress, his throne, his
position, the endless servants on standby waiting to do his bidding are
all meant to give the impression of great pomp and circumstance. To be
sure, the Torah warns that the king should bear in mind that the glory is
no more than a façade; that within he should remain humbled before his
maker and not let his position get to him. Indeed, the king is the only
person who must carry a sefer Torah with him at all times, and read from
it, lest his heart be swayed… But the reality is that at some point
outward appearances will have an impression on him, and he will sin. (One
need only examine the books of the Nevi'im [Prophets] to see that, on the
simplest level, even the greatest and most righteous of kings at some
point were swayed by the trappings of grandeur and power.)
But there is an anomaly. The Torah returns to the sin of the individual
(4:27), and there, instead of the more 'everyday' ki, the Torah uses im –
if this will happen, the diction previously reserved for the Kohen Gadol
because it implies something unlikely.
The nature of sin is such that while we may at times lose control and
commit acts we later regret, it is far more likely for a person to sin in
private – when it's between him and Hashem so to speak – than it is for
him to sin publically and have to answer for his actions. We know the
famous Gemara in which R' Yochanan ben Zakkai told his disciples, "May
Hashem grant that your fear of Heaven be akin to your fear of man." But
Rebbe, they argued, shouldn't one's fear of G-d be far greater than that
of mortals. "True," he answered, "but ha-levai/would it be that you should
even reach this level. Look, when the thief steals, what is he
thinking? 'I hope no one catches me…'"
The likelihood of sin, the K'li Yakar explains, is directly related to how
socially acceptable the sin is, notwithstanding whether Hashem condones it
or not. It would be intellectually dishonest to say that our moral
antennae receive their feedback solely from the Torah and its laws and
guidance. We study the Torah, learn its laws, and hopefully internalize
them. But then we (subconsciously) start looking around to see how others –
members of our community, people we respect, etc. – deal with the same
issues. Where we perceive among our peers diligence and scrupulousness, we
are bolstered, and recommit ourselves to the task. But where we experience
a lack of commitment among others, we subliminally let ourselves believe
that this issue/law/custom is in some way not as critical as others. We
may not sin on purpose, or even by accident – but were it to occur, our
horrification would not be as profound.
The first time the Torah speaks about a person sinning, where it uses ki
connoting likelihood, it says When a person sins… The second time, where
the Torah uses im, if, it says If an individual person from among the
people of the land shall sin. 'Individual' in this context means he has
done something unusual, he committed a sin that is out-of-the-norm (not
that there should be any norm when it comes to sin, but such is the
reality).
One moral of this story (there are surely many) is this: We do not live in
a vacuum. We are influenced by our society, more so by our community. We
likewise assert our influence on them.
It is a struggle, to be sure, but the Torah expects us to receive our
moral guidance from its elevated counsel, found in the halls and rooms in
which it is studied in its purest form. We cannot always close our eyes to
what goes on around us, but if we refract everything we see through its
prism, we can attain some level of detachment from the baser elements of
daily life and move closer to a Torah-true morality. We must also remember
that those around us are constantly influenced in the most subtle ways by
our actions, and may be learning and assuming things from us (whether good
or bad) we might never have imagined.
Have a good Shabbos.
Text Copyright © 2007 by Rabbi Eliyahu Hoffmann and Torah.org