Mattos/Masei
By Rabbi Yisroel Ciner
This week we read the double parsha of Matos-Masai which falls in the midst
of 'The Nine Days' - the days of mourning over the churban Beis Hamikdash
(the destruction of the Holy Temple). Chaza"l teach that the cause of the
destruction of the second Beis Hamikdash was sin'as chinam (unwarranted
hatred).
The Talmud [Gittin 55:] relates that Yerushalayim was destroyed through
Kamtza and Bar Kamtza. There were two people, one named Kamtza and the other
Bar Kamtza. A certain person who liked Kamtza but hated Bar Kamtza was
celebrating a festive meal. He instructed his servant to bring Kamtza to
join him but the servant, mistakenly, brought Bar Kamtza.
The host arrived, saw his enemy Bar Kamtza sitting there and furiously
ordered him to leave. Bar Kamtza turned to his host and pleaded: "Let me
remain and I'll pay for whatever I'll eat and drink". But the host refused.
"I'll pay for half of the entire affair, just let me remain", Bar Kamtza
implored. But the host still refused.
"I'll pay for the entire affair, just let me remain", he begged. The host
steadfastly refused and ordered Bar Kamtza bodily removed.
Bar Kamtza decided that, since the Rabbis were present and hadn't defended
him, they were also responsible for the humiliation he had suffered. He went
and slandered his people to the Caesar claiming that the Jews were rebelling
against him.
"How can this be proven?", the Caesar asked.
"Send a sacrifice to be offered in the Temple and we'll see if it'll be
sacrificed", Bar Kamtza responded.
The Caesar sent a calf to Yerushalayim but along the way Bar Kamtza slit its
lip, causing it to be blemished. {Sacrifices were brought to Hashem by Jews
and gentiles alike. Jews could only sacrifice in the Temple whereas gentiles
could also bring offerings outside of the Temple. Many blemishes which
disqualify an animal from being sacrificed by a Jew would not disqualify
the animal from being brought by a gentile outside of the Temple. However,
if the gentile wished the sacrifice to be offered in the Temple than it had
to be purely unblemished as that of a Jew. This lip-blemish therefore,
disqualified this animal as it was being offered in the Temple.} The kohanim
(priests), unwilling to sacrifice the animal, seemingly substantiated Bar
Kamtza's slanderous claim of a rebellion. The Caesar sent his armies who
laid siege on Yerushalayim for three years, leading to the ultimate
destruction.
Rabeinu Asher, well known by the acronym of his name, the Ro"sh, discusses
sin'as chinam (unwarranted hatred). "Don't involve yourself in an argument
that isn't yours. In the end, they'll make peace but you'll remain in your
state of anger." Their issue will ultimately be resolved -- you, who had no
real issue, will be left in an unresolved state.
<.p>
My wife and I often discuss how raising children offers a revealing glimpse
into oneself. I remember how my oldest son, as a young child, would stand
for a long while gazing into the open 'fridge'. Finally, I asked him what he
wanted. "I don't know but something", was his response. I, of course,
launched into a righteous presentation of how one should only open the
'fridge' to take out some particular food item. I remained confidently smug
in my parenting acumen until I found myself, about ten minutes later,
browsing through the fridge seeing what might look interesting...
We often laugh at children when they parade around, proudly proclaiming:
"Look at my new shoes! Aren't they nice?". We, of course, are far too
refined to do that. We'll ensure that everyone notices a new item of ours in
a much more subtle, sophisticated manner...
How often are our children involved in a skirmish with another child. We are
seething at the injustice done to our little angel. 'They can do what they
want to me, but don't touch my kid!', we say to ourselves. We tell the child
not to play with that child if he can't play nicely. Amazingly, ten minutes
later, they are once again the best of friends, running arm in arm. They are
over it -- we aren't. Our thoughts? How can he forgive him so fast?! Why
isn't he transgressing the Torah's commandments of not harboring ill
feelings and not taking revenge? Why haven't I successfully educated him to
be hateful...
It's so easy for us to get embroiled in that same midah (attribute) which
destroyed the Beis Hamikdash. Furthermore, we are obviously still very
involved in that midah, otherwise, we'd have personally witnessed the
rebuilding of the Beis Hamikdash!
In Eretz Yisroel, during the early 1900's, there were two hospitals
available to the Yerushalayim residents. One was Shaarei Tzedek, run by
religious Jews, and the other was a hospital run by missionaries.
At that time, many non-religious leaders had much animosity toward the
religious leaders. Rav Yosef Chaim Sonnenfeld, the venerable elder of
Yerushalayim, was the object of their hateful scorn. One of these virulently
anti-religious Jewish leaders was very ill. After spending two weeks in the
missionary hospital, his health took a serious turn for the worse and the
doctors there threw up their hands in despair. His family brought him to be
admitted to Shaarei Tzedek. The administrator there, upon hearing that he
had been in the missionary hospital until that point, refused to have him
admitted. A relative realized that the only one who could make this
administrator change his mind was Rav Yosef Chaim Sonnenfeld.
"I rushed to Rav Yosef Chaim's house in the pouring rain and by the time I
arrived I was soaked to the bone. When I entered his room, he was leaning
over a large Talmud, engrossed in study. I knew he was saddened that I had
left the ways of my parents, nevertheless, he greeted me warmly and invited
me to sit down.
"I apologized for the disruption and I related to him the whole story. I
included who the sick person was and which hospital he had been in.
"Rav Yosef Chaim gently bent the corner of the page he was studying, closed
the Talmud, stood up and began to don his coat. I explained that I hadn't
meant to trouble him to travel to the hospital -- all I wanted was a letter
to bring to the administrator.
"'When dealing with saving a life one doesn't send letters', he chastised
me. He ran up the stairs and out into the street. Although he was seventy
five years old and I was quite young, I could hardly keep up with him. The
rain then worsened and I suggested that we wait under an overhang until it
let up. His pace quickened as I heard him say to himself: 'We're saving a
life and I should be deterred by raindrops?!'.
"I entered the hospital behind him and I rushed into the room to hear his
words to the administrator: 'Since when do you decide halachic questions of
life and death? Admit him into the hospital and then we can discuss it!'. He
then turned to me saying: 'Bring the sick man, every moment is precious'.
"My relative was admitted to the hospital and a mere two weeks later he was
released with a clean bill of health. I was embarrassed to tell him how the
person he hated so much had been the one who saved his life."
Sin'as chinam (unwarranted hatred) -- the destruction.
Ahavas chinam
(unwarranted love and concern) -- the rebuilding.
May it be speedily in our
days...
Good Shabbos,
Yisroel Ciner
Copyright © 1998 by Rabbi Yisroel Ciner
and Project Genesis, Inc.
The author teaches at Neveh Tzion in
Telzstone (near Yerushalayim).