Creating Souls
Chapter 6, Mishna 3
By Rabbi Dovid Rosenfeld
"One who learns from his fellow a single chapter [of Torah], a single
law, a single verse, a single statement, or even a single letter, must
treat him with honor. For so we find with David, King of Israel, who
learned from Achitofel two things alone, and he called him his teacher,
his guide, and his intimate friend, as it is said: 'And you are a man of
my worth, my guide and intimate friend' (Psalms 55:14). And does not this
matter allow for logical deduction: If David, King of Israel, who learned
from Achitofel two
things alone, called him his teacher, guide and intimate, one who learns
from his fellow one chapter, one law, one verse, one statement, or even
one letter, all the more so must he treat him with honor. And honor is
[only due for] Torah, as it says: 'Honor -- the wise shall inherit'
(Proverbs 3:35); 'And perfect ones will inherit good' (ibid., 28:10). And
there is no good other than Torah, as it says, 'For a good possession have
I given you; do not forsake My Torah' (ibid., 4:2)."
(Achitofel was an adviser to King David who turned against him, siding
with Absalom's rebellion and eventually committing suicide. See II Samuel,
15-17. According to some commentators, Achitofel assisted Absalom in the
hope of ultimately usurping power himself.)
This week's mishna discusses the respect one must have for one who has
taught him Torah. As we will discuss, enlightening another with Torah
knowledge is a far greater act of giving than helping him in any other
way. The Sages liken this obligation to honoring one's parents (the fifth
of the Ten Commandments). The Mishna writes that in certain cases, if one
has the choice between assisting his father or his Torah teacher, his
teacher comes first, "for his father brought him into this world, whereas
his teacher who taught him wisdom brings him to the World to Come" (Bava
Metziah 2:11). Teaching Torah is thus viewed as one of the greatest acts
of giving, far beyond any kindness this world has to offer.
Our mishna goes so far as to state that a single letter of Torah is
invaluable. The commentators (e.g., Rav Hirsch) point out that Hebrew is a
very precise and compact language. Single letters are used to represent
many prepositions and conjunctions. Likewise, verb forms (singular vs.
plural, masculine vs. feminine, tense, etc.) may differ by a single letter
alone. Finally, the Sages often deduce laws and principles from the
insertion or omission of a single letter in the Torah. (The Talmud lauded
R. Akiva for learning "mounds upon mounds" of laws from the "crowns"
(serifs) on top of the letters of the Torah (Menachos 29b).) Thus, one may
enlighten his fellow in the meaning of a single letter of the Torah -- and
it may open a world of meaning.
This is one reason why Jews have always been so meticulous in their
preservation -- to the letter -- of the Torah. Jewish communities isolated
from each other for millennia, ranging from Eastern Europe to Yemen, have
found that after thousands of years their Torah scrolls differ by a
handful of letters alone.
The commentators question the logic of our mishna. If the basis for this
principle is the two laws which Achitofel taught David, how can our mishna
conclude the same for a single letter? Some (in the name of Rabbeinu
Ephraim) suggest that the reference to a single statement and letter
should be omitted. Others explain as we said above -- that much can be
deduced from a single letter -- far more than two laws alone. Finally,
others answer that if David, King of Israel, held Achitofel in high
esteem, who though an accomplished scholar was thoroughly wicked (the
Sages list him as one of the few individuals who did not merit the World
to Come), so too should we respect our teachers for enlightening us in an
even smaller amount of Torah (Ya'avetz).
Returning to the theme of our mishna, it's important to note that the
Sages limit their statement to Torah study alone. Say one person assists
another in performing a mitzvah (commandment) -- which the other did not
know how to perform. Here too, we would suppose, the instructor has aided
his fellow in a manner far greater than the father or mother who brought
him into the physical world. Yet the Sages make no such statement praising
such a person. Although he's certainly done something beyond the kindness
of this world, the Sages do not seem to get very excited about it (for
lack of better term) -- not nearly as much as they do for a single letter
of Torah. What makes Torah study so far superior?
The Talmud in fact makes a stronger statement regarding Torah study. In
Genesis 12, we read that Abraham followed G-d's command to emigrate to the
Land of Israel. Verse 5 states that he took with him the souls he "made"
in Charan. The simple meaning is the servants he acquired, as "making" in
Hebrew is sometimes used in this sense. The Sages, however, interpret it
to mean the souls he created -- by instructing them in the ways of G-d,
thereby bringing them to the truth of G-d's reality, or as the Sages state
it, "bringing them under the wings of the Divine Presence." Based on this
the Talmud comments: So too, anyone who teaches Torah to another is as if
he created him (Sanhedrin 99b). Thus, instructing another in Torah is akin
to creating him anew -- far greater than assisting him in a mitzvah and
certainly greater than forming him in this world. What is so unique about
teaching another Torah?
R. Naftali Tzvi Yehuda Berlin (the "Netziv" (ni-TSEEV), great 19th Century
Lithuanian rabbi) asked further on the Talmud above: What is the
comparison between Abraham, who converted souls to monotheism, to one who
teaches another Torah? We can perhaps appreciate that instructing pagans
in belief in G-d is a form of creation. It is taking people from a
meaningless and empty existence and providing them with a connection to G-
d and eternity. But how can the Talmud equate teaching Torah to this? If
you help your fellow study it is obviously a great act. But if he was a
believing Jew yesterday, and today he is the same believing Jew -- just
slightly more knowledgeable -- how have you "created" him?
The Netziv answers that Torah study is unlike every other mitzvah. (In a
way this class may seem repetitive to previous ones in this chapter. But
we are dealing with a fundamental -- really, what makes us Jews -- well
worth the entire chapter devoted to it.) If I help someone perform a
mitzvah -- say how to don tefillin (phylacteries) -- he is helped in that
way alone. As great a mitzvah it is, the "helped" is only one mitzvah
better than he was before. Torah study, however, is very different. If I
teach you so much as one letter of Torah, you are not only helped in that
one particular. You become a new and transformed person -- entirely new
horizons have opened before you -- and in a way I have created you anew.
Torah study is not a collection of thoughts or information. It is a link
and connection to G-d Himself. Every part of the Torah forges that
connection in its own way. One can study what would otherwise seem the
driest and most technical part of the Torah (the classic example invoked
at such points is, "If an ox gores a cow..." (Mishna Bava Kama 5:1)), and
find himself becoming a more sensitive, caring person. (One needs only see
how enthused and energized yeshiva students become when delving into such
subjects -- how their very souls become ignited with the word of G-d.
Imagine, conversely, studying such detailed civil law of any other legal
code -- without falling asleep.) Torah study has this effect on an
individual. It is not only the knowledge per se. It is that link to the
infinite, one which both awakens and overwhelms. It takes the entire
person -- by his soul -- and transforms him into a greater, wiser, and
more sanctified human being.
Text Copyright © 2006 by Rabbi Dovid Rosenfeld and Torah.org.