Torah.org Home Subscribe Services Support Us
 
Print Version

Email this article to a friend
Rambam

Rambam

Rabbi Yitzchok Etshalom
Talmud Torah 2:2

2: We bring the children in to learn at about six or seven years of age, according to the stamina of the child and the strength of his body. We never bring them in to learn before six years of age. The teacher [may] [does] strike them with a strap to induce fear in them. He may not strike them with a blow of enmity or cruelty; therefore, he may not strike them with whips or sticks, rather with a short strap. He sits and teaches them all day and a little bit of the night, in order to train them to study during the day and at night. And the children should not interrupt at all except for *Erev Shabbat* (Shabbat eve- Friday afternoon) and *Erev Yom Tov* (Festival eve - the afternoon before a holiday) and on *Yamim Tovim* (Festivals). However, on Shabbat, they do not learn new material, rather they do a first review. We do not interrupt the children [at study] even for the building of the *Beit haMiqdash* (Holy Temple).

Q1: Why can we not bring a child to school before 6 years of age?

YE: From the development of the *sugya* in Bava Bathra, it seems that it is a health and stamina issue. Tosafot (ibid. s.v. B'vatzir) quotes the Gemara in Ketubot (50a)which indicates that teaching the child before 6 years of age can have far-reaching consequences - socially and physically - for the child. This may be different when all children begin their studies earlier.

Q2: Why is the teacher allowed to strike them at all? (I realize that this question bears some socio-historical components - but these are worth investigating as well)

JB: In a nutshell, our schools are ENTIRELY different than those in the days of R. Back then, it was a personal, close relationship, where the rabbi was hired by the parents. He treated the student like a son, as we read about all the rules governing their relationship. In this framework, a slap on the hand is almost a parental gesture, one that has, since the beginning of time, been accepted. In the late 20th century, however, the school is a factory, churning out hundreds of students, whose teachers move in shifts and in the course of a couple of years might teach thousands of students. The relationship between parent and school is almost like a supplier/consumer, and the average teacher does not usually "bond" like in R's days. That, coupled with legal issues imposed by Western culture that allow nothing that could even resemble abuse, makes it so foreign to us. It would be construed, possibly accurately, as a gesture of anger rather than caring. OK, so it was a big nutshell.

Q3: Why do they not study on Yom Tov, but they do on Shabbat?

JB: The "inyan" [issue? theme?] of Yom Tov is simcha - happiness and rejoicing. Students. Studying. 'Nuf said.

Q4: Why only review on Shabbat?

JB: In describing the way you should go thru a typical Shabbat, R says you go to shul, make kiddush, learn till about 1, eat lunch, then go back to shul and learn till *seuda shlishit* (the third meal) at which time you eat and drink till *havdala* (service at the end of Shabbat). He clearly values learing on Shabbat (and frowns on sleep!) but at the same time, it must be different than a regular day on which a kid learns all day long! A compromise is to learn, but simply review which is more relaxed and enjoyable because you have the confidence that you know it...

YE: The source of this Halakha is a sugya in Nedarim 37. Two explanations are given (according to the opinion that it is *s'char shimur* - see the sugya inside for details) - first of all, it will prevent the fathers from celebrating Shabbat with their children, as the fathers will be worried about taking their children away from their studies (evidently, if you review, there is less concern about missing - which makes sense). Second - since they eat and drink more than they are accustomed to eat and drink during the week, their bodies are heavier and they are too tired to concentrate on a new piece of material. (This explanation is based on Ran's commentary; Tosafot ad loc. has a different explanation, which also revolves around the interruption of *oneg Shabbat* (Shabbat pleasure).

Rambam, Copyright (c) 1999 Project Genesis, Inc.

 


ARTICLES ON MIKETZ AND CHANUKAH:

View Complete List

Oh Dreidel, Dreidel, Dreidel!
Rabbi Label Lam - 5768

The Essential Attributes of Being an
Rabbi Yissocher Frand - 5771

“So you Think You’re The Man, Alexander?” (Insights for Chanukah)
Jon Erlbaum - 0

> Stuck on Gum
Rabbi Mordechai Kamenetzky - 5757

A Tale of Two Pharoahs
Rabbi Mordechai Kamenetzky - 5762

Mercy Filling
Rabbi Mordechai Kamenetzky - 5763

Frumster - Orthodox Jewish Dating

Days of Eight
Rabbi Label Lam - 5763

Why Eight Days?
Rabbi Yehudah Prero - 5755

The Lost Jewel
Shlomo Katz - 5765

Looking for a Chavrusah?

Yosef and Chanukah
Rabbi Yisroel Ciner - 5757

"Your Servant, Our Father"
Rabbi Yissocher Frand - 5775

Shadowy Existence
Rabbi Eliyahu Hoffmann - 5763

ArtScroll

Don't Be Jealous!
Rabbi Yaakov Menken - 5755

Standing Over the River
Shlomo Katz - 5761

Yiras Shomayim: The G-d-fearer
Rabbi Osher Chaim Levene - 5767

Non Negotiable Part III
Rabbi Aron Tendler - 5765



Project Genesis

Torah.org Home


Torah Portion

Jewish Law

Ethics

Texts

Learn the Basics

Seasons

Features

TORAHAUDIO

Ask The Rabbi

Knowledge Base




Help

About Us

Contact Us



Free Book on Geulah!




Torah.org Home
Torah.org HomeCapalon.com Copyright Information