Torah.org Home Subscribe Services Support Us
 
Print Version

Email this article to a friend
Rambam

Rambam

Rabbi Yitzchok Etshalom
Talmud Torah 2:4

4: Someone who is unmarried should not teach children, on account of their mothers who come to their children. A woman should not teach children on account of their fathers who come to their children.

Q1: Why distinguish between men and women this way; that all women may not teach, because of the fathers, but married men may teach?

YE: The source of this Halakha is the Mishna at the end of Kiddushin: "A bachlor should not teach, nor should a woman teach; R. Elazar says: even someone who has no wife should not teach" (the Gemara explains that this refers to a man who is married but whose wife is away at the time). Gemara: (82a) "What is the reason (for this prohibition)? - a bachelor, on account of the mothers of the children (Rashi: the children's mothers are frequently in his company, as they bring their children to the school); and a woman on account of the fathers of the children."

The problem is *Yichud* - the prohibition of being in seclusion with a (sexually) prohibited member of the opposite sex. Some of the *Nos'ei Keilim* (commentaries on the MT) indicate that R only allows the man to teach if his wife is with him - in which case, the parallel case would be for the woman to teach while her husband is with her at home - which raises the question: why would anyone think that this is prohibited?

By the way, the Rosh (Rabbenu Asher b. Yechiel, d. 1327, Toledo, Spain) indicates (Kitzur Piskei haRosh, Kiddushin 4:26) that this law is equal for women - only unmarried women may not teach.

Q2: Shouldn't this Halakha be more properly placed in Hilkhot Issurei Biah (Laws of Forbidden Sexual Liaisons), chapter 21, where all of the sex-separation laws are mentioned?

YE: Indeed, it is found there! (22:13) with a bit more detail. R, however, also codifies it here because this is the definition of "who may teach" - just as in the previous Halakha, he indicated the need to have a God-fearing and sharp teacher; here he is adding one more component to the job description.

By the way, Jay Bailey's posting (found in archives: 2:2), about the differences between the functions of the educational system then and now are relevant here: Clearly, there was no "school building" in today's sense, as much as a private house (which will be discussed at greater length in TT 2:7) - which is why these problems of *yichud* arise.

Rambam, Copyright (c) 1999 Project Genesis, Inc.

 






ARTICLES ON VAYEITZEI AND CHANUKAH:

View Complete List

The 'Luz' Bone
Shlomo Katz - 5773

There to Share
Rabbi Label Lam - 5763

Well Check-Up
Rabbi Mordechai Kamenetzky - 5759

Looking for a Chavrusah?

Tightening the Hellenistic Screws: A History of Chanukah, Part I
Rabbi Naphtali Hoff - 5774

Can You Pass The Test?
Shlomo Katz - 5763

Caught Not Taught
Rabbi Dovid Green - 5758

Frumster - Orthodox Jewish Dating

Horns and Hedonism
Rabbi Eliyahu Hoffmann - 5763

How Are You Doing?
Rabbi Raymond Beyda - 5765

It's a Match!
Rabbi Yissocher Frand - 5761

ArtScroll

Rabbi Frand on Parshas Vayeitzei
Rabbi Yissocher Frand - 5770

Our Noble Mission
Rabbi Label Lam - 5766

The House of Yaakov
Rabbi Yissocher Frand - 5756

> Sadly Released from Prison
Rabbi Yisroel Ciner - 5758

Those Small Jars
Rabbi Pinchas Winston - 5758

How Extrordinary The Result
Rabbi Dovid Green - 5761

"More Than I Deserve"
Rabbi Yissocher Frand - 5763



Project Genesis

Torah.org Home


Torah Portion

Jewish Law

Ethics

Texts

Learn the Basics

Seasons

Features

TORAHAUDIO

Ask The Rabbi

Knowledge Base




Help

About Us

Contact Us



Free Book on Geulah!




Torah.org Home
Torah.org HomeCapalon.com Copyright Information