Torah.org Home Subscribe Services Support Us
 
Print Version

Email this article to a friend
Rambam

Rambam

Rabbi Yitzchok Etshalom
Talmud Torah 2:4

4: Someone who is unmarried should not teach children, on account of their mothers who come to their children. A woman should not teach children on account of their fathers who come to their children.

Q1: Why distinguish between men and women this way; that all women may not teach, because of the fathers, but married men may teach?

YE: The source of this Halakha is the Mishna at the end of Kiddushin: "A bachlor should not teach, nor should a woman teach; R. Elazar says: even someone who has no wife should not teach" (the Gemara explains that this refers to a man who is married but whose wife is away at the time). Gemara: (82a) "What is the reason (for this prohibition)? - a bachelor, on account of the mothers of the children (Rashi: the children's mothers are frequently in his company, as they bring their children to the school); and a woman on account of the fathers of the children."

The problem is *Yichud* - the prohibition of being in seclusion with a (sexually) prohibited member of the opposite sex. Some of the *Nos'ei Keilim* (commentaries on the MT) indicate that R only allows the man to teach if his wife is with him - in which case, the parallel case would be for the woman to teach while her husband is with her at home - which raises the question: why would anyone think that this is prohibited?

By the way, the Rosh (Rabbenu Asher b. Yechiel, d. 1327, Toledo, Spain) indicates (Kitzur Piskei haRosh, Kiddushin 4:26) that this law is equal for women - only unmarried women may not teach.

Q2: Shouldn't this Halakha be more properly placed in Hilkhot Issurei Biah (Laws of Forbidden Sexual Liaisons), chapter 21, where all of the sex-separation laws are mentioned?

YE: Indeed, it is found there! (22:13) with a bit more detail. R, however, also codifies it here because this is the definition of "who may teach" - just as in the previous Halakha, he indicated the need to have a God-fearing and sharp teacher; here he is adding one more component to the job description.

By the way, Jay Bailey's posting (found in archives: 2:2), about the differences between the functions of the educational system then and now are relevant here: Clearly, there was no "school building" in today's sense, as much as a private house (which will be discussed at greater length in TT 2:7) - which is why these problems of *yichud* arise.

Rambam, Copyright (c) 1999 Project Genesis, Inc.

 






ARTICLES ON NOACH:

View Complete List

Positive Speech Builds a Brighter World
Rabbi Pinchas Avruch - 5762

What Goes Around Comes Around
Rabbi Pinchas Winston - 5760

Wine and Window Washers
Rabbi Naftali Reich - 5770

Looking for a Chavrusah?

Unity and Conformity
Rabbi Berel Wein - 5765

The Name of HASHEM
Rabbi Label Lam - 5772

Language Barrier
Rabbi Mordechai Kamenetzky - 5760

Frumster - Orthodox Jewish Dating

Rabbi Frand on Parshas Noach
Rabbi Yissocher Frand - 5770

The Sign of the Olive
Rabbi Naftali Reich - 5767

New Stage, Old Actors
Rabbi Pinchas Winston - 5762

ArtScroll

Too Perfect
Rabbi Eliyahu Hoffmann - 5759

Window to the World
Rabbi Mordechai Kamenetzky - 5762

Coming to Terms with the World to Come
Rabbi Eliyahu Hoffmann - 5761

> Why We Keep Sinning
Rabbi Pinchas Winston - 5774

Intellectual Beliefs
Shlomo Katz - 5758

Taking the Initiative
Rabbi Pinchas Winston - 5772

The Seven Noachide Laws
Rabbi Osher Chaim Levene - 5769



Project Genesis

Torah.org Home


Torah Portion

Jewish Law

Ethics

Texts

Learn the Basics

Seasons

Features

TORAHAUDIO

Ask The Rabbi

Knowledge Base




Help

About Us

Contact Us



Free Book on Geulah!




Torah.org Home
Torah.org HomeCapalon.com Copyright Information