Torah.org Home Subscribe Services Support Us
 
Print Version

Email this article to a friend
Rambam

Rambam

Rabbi Yitzchok Etshalom
Talmud Torah 2:4

4: Someone who is unmarried should not teach children, on account of their mothers who come to their children. A woman should not teach children on account of their fathers who come to their children.

Q1: Why distinguish between men and women this way; that all women may not teach, because of the fathers, but married men may teach?

YE: The source of this Halakha is the Mishna at the end of Kiddushin: "A bachlor should not teach, nor should a woman teach; R. Elazar says: even someone who has no wife should not teach" (the Gemara explains that this refers to a man who is married but whose wife is away at the time). Gemara: (82a) "What is the reason (for this prohibition)? - a bachelor, on account of the mothers of the children (Rashi: the children's mothers are frequently in his company, as they bring their children to the school); and a woman on account of the fathers of the children."

The problem is *Yichud* - the prohibition of being in seclusion with a (sexually) prohibited member of the opposite sex. Some of the *Nos'ei Keilim* (commentaries on the MT) indicate that R only allows the man to teach if his wife is with him - in which case, the parallel case would be for the woman to teach while her husband is with her at home - which raises the question: why would anyone think that this is prohibited?

By the way, the Rosh (Rabbenu Asher b. Yechiel, d. 1327, Toledo, Spain) indicates (Kitzur Piskei haRosh, Kiddushin 4:26) that this law is equal for women - only unmarried women may not teach.

Q2: Shouldn't this Halakha be more properly placed in Hilkhot Issurei Biah (Laws of Forbidden Sexual Liaisons), chapter 21, where all of the sex-separation laws are mentioned?

YE: Indeed, it is found there! (22:13) with a bit more detail. R, however, also codifies it here because this is the definition of "who may teach" - just as in the previous Halakha, he indicated the need to have a God-fearing and sharp teacher; here he is adding one more component to the job description.

By the way, Jay Bailey's posting (found in archives: 2:2), about the differences between the functions of the educational system then and now are relevant here: Clearly, there was no "school building" in today's sense, as much as a private house (which will be discussed at greater length in TT 2:7) - which is why these problems of *yichud* arise.

Rambam, Copyright (c) 1999 Project Genesis, Inc.

 






ARTICLES ON NETZAVIM AND VAYEILECH:

View Complete List

The Longest Day
Rabbi Pinchas Winston - 5769

Falsehood Has No Legs
Shlomo Katz - 5758

Reflecting Back on Shemittah
Shlomo Katz - 5761

Frumster - Orthodox Jewish Dating

Rav Chaim Saw In The Pasuk What We See With Our Eyes
Rabbi Yissocher Frand - 5764

Long Way Back
Rabbi Berel Wein - 5773

This Time, Let's Do It Right
Rabbi Yaakov Menken - 5764

> Rabbi Frand on Parshas Vayelech
- 5769

Facing the Covenant
Rabbi Berel Wein - 5764

On a Personal Note
Rabbi Yochanan Zweig - 5770

Looking for a Chavrusah?

Rosh Hashana and the Kiss of Life
Rabbi Naftali Reich - 5773

Going Beyond Realization
Rabbi Yosef Kalatsky - 5763

A Good Core
Rabbi Pinchas Winston - 5771

ArtScroll

Casting the Mold for Next Year's Blessings
Rabbi Yosef Aryeh Schlussel - 5761

Reading Between The Lines
Rabbi Aron Tendler - 5764

Going For Gold
Rabbi Yochanan Zweig - 5771

Sputterless
Rabbi Mordechai Kamenetzky - 5758



Project Genesis

Torah.org Home


Torah Portion

Jewish Law

Ethics

Texts

Learn the Basics

Seasons

Features

TORAHAUDIO

Ask The Rabbi

Knowledge Base




Help

About Us

Contact Us



Free Book on Geulah!




Torah.org Home
Torah.org HomeCapalon.com Copyright Information