Torah.org Home Subscribe Services Support Us
 
Print Version

Email this article to a friend
Rambam

Rambam

Rabbi Yitzchok Etshalom
Talmud Torah 7:2

2. *Keitzad* - (How do we administer) *Nidui*? He says: "*Ploni y'hei b'shamta* ("John Doe is ostracized"). If they placed him under Nidui in his presence, he says: *Ploni zeh b'shamta*" ("_this_ John Doe is ostracized"). If it is a case of *Herem* (a stronger form of ostracism, detailed later in Halakha 5) - he says: "*Ploni Much'ram*". And *Arur* (a curse) includes *Alah* (another form of curse); *Sh'vuah* (an oath) and *Nidui*.

Q1: Is *Shamta* the same as *Nidui*?

YE: According to Rambam, it clearly is the same. However, Tur (Yoreh Deah 334) quotes an opinion of RABD that Shamta is more severe than Nidui, and that therefore, the court should not declare *Ploni y'hei b'shamta*, rather *Ploni y'hei b'nidui* when effecting *Nidui*.

Q2: What is the meaning of the last line in this Halakha - and what is its relevance here?

YE: The source is the Gemara in Sh'vuot (36a): "We were taught: *Arur* implies *Nidui*, *Q'lalah* and *Sh'vuah*. The Gemara then derives, from Biblical texts, that the Hebrew root *A-R-R* is associated with ostracism (Judges 5), *Q'lalah* (cursing) - (Devarim [Deuteronomy] 27) and *Sh'vuah* (oath) from Yehoshua (Yehoshua [Joshua] 6). The Halakhic import of this statement is that a declaration of *Arur* ("Cursed is...") includes all of these - even *Nidui*. Therefore, if the court, instead of declaring either of the earlier formulas presented by Rambam, declared *Arur* - that would be an effective *Nidui*. In MT Sanhedrin 26:3, Rambam applies this Halakha to cursing - if someone cursed a fellow and, instead of the root *Q-L-L* he used *A-R-R*, that is still a curse and, under the proper conditions, he may be held culpable.

Rashi (Sh'vuot 36a s.v. Arur bo) explains that A-R-R may be understood as an oath, curse _or_ ban of ostracism _depending_on_context. Although in our Halakhah and in MT Sanhedrin, Rambam's approach is unclear, from MT Sh'vuot 2:2, it seems that he agrees with Rashi.

Rambam, Copyright (c) 1999 Project Genesis, Inc.

 






ARTICLES ON LECH LECHA:

View Complete List

Not Just A Tool
Rabbi Yochanan Zweig - 5773

“The Place That I Will Show You!”
Rabbi Label Lam - 5767

Take the Initiative!
Shlomo Katz - 5774

Looking for a Chavrusah?

Avram Lifted Up His Hand...So That You Not Say
Rabbi Yissocher Frand - 5773

Rabbi Frand on Parshas Lech Lecha
- 5769

Recognizing the Source of Our Good
Rabbi Pinchas Avruch - 5762

> Lech-Lecha #1 or Lech-Lecha #2 – Which is the harder test?
Rabbi Yissocher Frand - 5771

Better A Second Time Around
Shlomo Katz - 5767

Don't Doubt My G-d
Rabbi Yissocher Frand - 5775

ArtScroll

Once a Jew, Always a Jew
Rabbi Yaakov Menken - 5759

No Business As Usual
Rabbi Yissocher Frand - 5762

Wake-Up Call
Rabbi Mordechai Kamenetzky - 5759

Frumster - Orthodox Jewish Dating

Lot’s and Lots of Opportunities
Rabbi Label Lam - 5774

Connoisseur's Delight
Rabbi Eliyahu Hoffmann - 5762

Don't Walk in Front of Me (Anymore)
Shlomo Katz - 5763

Out of This World
Rabbi Label Lam - 5769



Project Genesis

Torah.org Home


Torah Portion

Jewish Law

Ethics

Texts

Learn the Basics

Seasons

Features

TORAHAUDIO

Ask The Rabbi

Knowledge Base




Help

About Us

Contact Us



Free Book on Geulah!




Torah.org Home
Torah.org HomeCapalon.com Copyright Information