Torah.org Home Subscribe Services Support Us
 
Print Version

Email this article to a friend
Rambam

Rambam

Rabbi Yitzchok Etshalom
Talmud Torah 7:2

2. *Keitzad* - (How do we administer) *Nidui*? He says: "*Ploni y'hei b'shamta* ("John Doe is ostracized"). If they placed him under Nidui in his presence, he says: *Ploni zeh b'shamta*" ("_this_ John Doe is ostracized"). If it is a case of *Herem* (a stronger form of ostracism, detailed later in Halakha 5) - he says: "*Ploni Much'ram*". And *Arur* (a curse) includes *Alah* (another form of curse); *Sh'vuah* (an oath) and *Nidui*.

Q1: Is *Shamta* the same as *Nidui*?

YE: According to Rambam, it clearly is the same. However, Tur (Yoreh Deah 334) quotes an opinion of RABD that Shamta is more severe than Nidui, and that therefore, the court should not declare *Ploni y'hei b'shamta*, rather *Ploni y'hei b'nidui* when effecting *Nidui*.

Q2: What is the meaning of the last line in this Halakha - and what is its relevance here?

YE: The source is the Gemara in Sh'vuot (36a): "We were taught: *Arur* implies *Nidui*, *Q'lalah* and *Sh'vuah*. The Gemara then derives, from Biblical texts, that the Hebrew root *A-R-R* is associated with ostracism (Judges 5), *Q'lalah* (cursing) - (Devarim [Deuteronomy] 27) and *Sh'vuah* (oath) from Yehoshua (Yehoshua [Joshua] 6). The Halakhic import of this statement is that a declaration of *Arur* ("Cursed is...") includes all of these - even *Nidui*. Therefore, if the court, instead of declaring either of the earlier formulas presented by Rambam, declared *Arur* - that would be an effective *Nidui*. In MT Sanhedrin 26:3, Rambam applies this Halakha to cursing - if someone cursed a fellow and, instead of the root *Q-L-L* he used *A-R-R*, that is still a curse and, under the proper conditions, he may be held culpable.

Rashi (Sh'vuot 36a s.v. Arur bo) explains that A-R-R may be understood as an oath, curse _or_ ban of ostracism _depending_on_context. Although in our Halakhah and in MT Sanhedrin, Rambam's approach is unclear, from MT Sh'vuot 2:2, it seems that he agrees with Rashi.

Rambam, Copyright (c) 1999 Project Genesis, Inc.

 

ARTICLES ON NASO:

View Complete List

A Promise of Good Will Not Be Retracted
Rabbi Yaakov Menken - 5758

Respectful Repeats
Rabbi Mordechai Kamenetzky - 5762

Parshas Naso and Chag Shavuos
Rabbi Chaim Flom - 5767

> Too Much "Ish"
Rabbi Yissocher Frand - 5763

Out Of Control
Rabbi Yochanan Zweig - 5771

Ditto
Rabbi Yisroel Ciner - 5757

Looking for a Chavrusah?

Seeing the Big Picture
Rabbi Pinchas Winston - 5774

Possessive Nouns
Rabbi Mordechai Kamenetzky - 5760

The Dilemma of Nisanel ben Tzuar
Rabbi Yissocher Frand - 5758

ArtScroll

Channeling Divine Light to the Entire World
Rabbi Pinchas Winston - 5771

Being a Levi
Rabbi Berel Wein - 5773

Building On The Positive
Rabbi Pinchas Avruch - 5764

Frumster - Orthodox Jewish Dating

A Drink of Wine
Rabbi Naftali Reich - 5769

Bringing Joy to G-d and Man
Rabbi Eliyahu Hoffmann - 5763

Faith in Motion
Rabbi Naftali Reich - 5773

A Little Peace in Our Time
Jon Erlbaum - 0



Project Genesis

Torah.org Home


Torah Portion

Jewish Law

Ethics

Texts

Learn the Basics

Seasons

Features

TORAHAUDIO

Ask The Rabbi

Knowledge Base




Help

About Us

Contact Us



Free Book on Geulah!




Torah.org Home
Torah.org HomeCapalon.com Copyright Information