Torah.org Home Subscribe Services Support Us
 
Print Version

Email this article to a friend
Rambam

Rambam

Rabbi Yitzchok Etshalom
Talmud Torah 7:2

2. *Keitzad* - (How do we administer) *Nidui*? He says: "*Ploni y'hei b'shamta* ("John Doe is ostracized"). If they placed him under Nidui in his presence, he says: *Ploni zeh b'shamta*" ("_this_ John Doe is ostracized"). If it is a case of *Herem* (a stronger form of ostracism, detailed later in Halakha 5) - he says: "*Ploni Much'ram*". And *Arur* (a curse) includes *Alah* (another form of curse); *Sh'vuah* (an oath) and *Nidui*.

Q1: Is *Shamta* the same as *Nidui*?

YE: According to Rambam, it clearly is the same. However, Tur (Yoreh Deah 334) quotes an opinion of RABD that Shamta is more severe than Nidui, and that therefore, the court should not declare *Ploni y'hei b'shamta*, rather *Ploni y'hei b'nidui* when effecting *Nidui*.

Q2: What is the meaning of the last line in this Halakha - and what is its relevance here?

YE: The source is the Gemara in Sh'vuot (36a): "We were taught: *Arur* implies *Nidui*, *Q'lalah* and *Sh'vuah*. The Gemara then derives, from Biblical texts, that the Hebrew root *A-R-R* is associated with ostracism (Judges 5), *Q'lalah* (cursing) - (Devarim [Deuteronomy] 27) and *Sh'vuah* (oath) from Yehoshua (Yehoshua [Joshua] 6). The Halakhic import of this statement is that a declaration of *Arur* ("Cursed is...") includes all of these - even *Nidui*. Therefore, if the court, instead of declaring either of the earlier formulas presented by Rambam, declared *Arur* - that would be an effective *Nidui*. In MT Sanhedrin 26:3, Rambam applies this Halakha to cursing - if someone cursed a fellow and, instead of the root *Q-L-L* he used *A-R-R*, that is still a curse and, under the proper conditions, he may be held culpable.

Rashi (Sh'vuot 36a s.v. Arur bo) explains that A-R-R may be understood as an oath, curse _or_ ban of ostracism _depending_on_context. Although in our Halakhah and in MT Sanhedrin, Rambam's approach is unclear, from MT Sh'vuot 2:2, it seems that he agrees with Rashi.

Rambam, Copyright (c) 1999 Project Genesis, Inc.

 


ARTICLES ON MIKETZ AND CHANUKAH:

View Complete List

A Double Loss!
Rabbi Label Lam - 5767

Chanukah
Rabbi Berel Wein - 5761

Not a Minute Past the Expiration Date
Rabbi Yaakov Menken - 5757

> The Fall of Communism
Rabbi Yissocher Frand - 5758

The Real Story
Rabbi Yaakov Menken - 5763

Nice Guys Finish Second -- Second in Command to Pharoah
Rabbi Yissocher Frand - 5766

ArtScroll

In the nick of time
Shlomo Katz - 5770

Sadly Released from Prison
Rabbi Yisroel Ciner - 5758

An End to Our Darkness
Rabbi Berel Wein - 5772

Frumster - Orthodox Jewish Dating

The Lost Jewel
Shlomo Katz - 5765

A Superficial Light
Rabbi Yochanan Zweig - 5770

Dreams
Shlomo Katz - 5763

Looking for a Chavrusah?

Yosef Recognizes His Brothers
- 5773

8 - The Symbol of Eternity
Rabbi Label Lam - 5773

In Your Dreams
Rabbi Eliyahu Hoffmann - 5765

To Fergin Or Forget
Rabbi Yochanan Zweig - 5771



Project Genesis

Torah.org Home


Torah Portion

Jewish Law

Ethics

Texts

Learn the Basics

Seasons

Features

TORAHAUDIO

Ask The Rabbi

Knowledge Base




Help

About Us

Contact Us



Free Book on Geulah!




Torah.org Home
Torah.org HomeCapalon.com Copyright Information