Torah.org Home Subscribe Services Support Us
 
Print Version

Email this article to a friend
Rambam

Rambam

Rabbi Yitzchok Etshalom
Talmud Torah 7:5

5. The *Muchram* (person under *Herem* - a more severe form of ostracism) is even more [restricted] - he does not teach others, nor do they teach him -however, he may teach himself, in order not to forget his learning. He may not be hired, nor may he hire others. We do not conduct business with him. We only deal with him a little, enough for his subsistence.

Q1: Why does Rambam say that the *Muchram* may study? Isn't that obvious?

YE: Not so obvious. Remember that the prohibitions of a *Menudeh* and *Muchram* are connected to (and, perhaps, derived from) the prohibitions of an *Avel* (mourner). A mourner is prohibited from any Torah study - even on his own. Therefore, we reasonably might have concluded that the same is true for the *Muchram*.

Why indeed is it different? The Avel's avoidance of Torah study is based upon the notion that Torah study is a source (the best source!) of happiness. "The statutes of the Lord are straight, _gladdening_the_heart" (Tehillim [Psalms] 19). Although the *Muchram* acts similarly to the mourner, that is chiefly in those activities which affect his social interaction - he isn't really prohibited from "joyous" activities.

In addition, unlike the mourner, whose situation was thrust upon him and who bears no direct responsibility for it - the *Muchram* has caused his own distancing and disgrace. What better way to become motivated to repair that disgrace than through the study of Torah!

Another reason - the mourner only avoids Torah study for a week; the *Herem* may be in effect much longer.

Q2: Why does Rambam qualify the permit for the *Muchram* to study - "...in order not to forget his learning."?

YE: Perhaps Rambam is addressing the previous question - and favoring the last answer (i.e. due to the potential length of the *Herem*, he may forget his learning - which is inapplicable to a mourner).

RD (Rick Dinitz):
Here's another question about this passage:

Q3: How do we resolve the seeming contradiction between the last two sentences? If we do not conduct business with a muchram, how then can we deal with him a little, enough for his subsistence?

YE: Perhaps it means that we do not enter into ongoing business dealings (partnerships, major deals etc.) - but may conduct one-time dealings which he needs for his own subsistence.

Rambam, Copyright (c) 1999 Project Genesis, Inc.

Please Support TORAH.ORG
Print Version       Email this article to a friend

 

ARTICLES ON VAYEITZEI AND CHANUKAH:

View Complete List

Seeking Yitzchak
Rabbi Aron Tendler - 5765

See What Will Be
Rabbi Label Lam - 5769

Heavenly Protection
Rabbi Berel Wein - 5767

The Everything Torah Book

Making A Deal With The Almighty In The Tradition of Yaakov Avinu
Rabbi Yissocher Frand - 5767

Light From Darkness, Take Two
Rabbi Pinchas Winston - 5766

Can You Pass The Test?
Shlomo Katz - 5763

Email Sponsorship

The Strong and the Weak
Rabbi Berel Wein - 5767

Time Study
Rabbi Raymond Beyda - 5766

Going the Extra Mile
Rabbi Pinchas Avruch - 5762

ArtScroll

Chanukah: A Postscript
Rabbi Yehudah Prero - 5756

The Challenges Ahead
Rabbi Label Lam - 5765

Why Eight Days?
Rabbi Yehudah Prero - 5755

You've Got To Have Heart
Rabbi Yissocher Frand - 5762

Of Climbing Ladders and Tugging Ropes
Rabbi Osher Chaim Levene - 5768

Sadly Released from Prison
Rabbi Yisroel Ciner - 5758

Mitzvah Lamp
Rabbi Osher Chaim Levene - 5766


Learning Events and Programs

Project Genesis

Torah.org Home


Torah Portion

Jewish Law

Ethics

Texts

Learn the Basics

Seasons

Features

TORAHAUDIO

Ask The Rabbi

Knowledge Base

Discussion Forum




Help

About Us

Contact Us


Enable popup menus


Download to my HandHeld


Torah.org Home
Torah.org HomeCapalon.com Copyright Information