Home Subscribe Services Support Us
Print Version

Email this article to a friend


Rabbi Yitzchok Etshalom
Talmud Torah 7:5

5. The *Muchram* (person under *Herem* - a more severe form of ostracism) is even more [restricted] - he does not teach others, nor do they teach him -however, he may teach himself, in order not to forget his learning. He may not be hired, nor may he hire others. We do not conduct business with him. We only deal with him a little, enough for his subsistence.

Q1: Why does Rambam say that the *Muchram* may study? Isn't that obvious?

YE: Not so obvious. Remember that the prohibitions of a *Menudeh* and *Muchram* are connected to (and, perhaps, derived from) the prohibitions of an *Avel* (mourner). A mourner is prohibited from any Torah study - even on his own. Therefore, we reasonably might have concluded that the same is true for the *Muchram*.

Why indeed is it different? The Avel's avoidance of Torah study is based upon the notion that Torah study is a source (the best source!) of happiness. "The statutes of the Lord are straight, _gladdening_the_heart" (Tehillim [Psalms] 19). Although the *Muchram* acts similarly to the mourner, that is chiefly in those activities which affect his social interaction - he isn't really prohibited from "joyous" activities.

In addition, unlike the mourner, whose situation was thrust upon him and who bears no direct responsibility for it - the *Muchram* has caused his own distancing and disgrace. What better way to become motivated to repair that disgrace than through the study of Torah!

Another reason - the mourner only avoids Torah study for a week; the *Herem* may be in effect much longer.

Q2: Why does Rambam qualify the permit for the *Muchram* to study - " order not to forget his learning."?

YE: Perhaps Rambam is addressing the previous question - and favoring the last answer (i.e. due to the potential length of the *Herem*, he may forget his learning - which is inapplicable to a mourner).

RD (Rick Dinitz):
Here's another question about this passage:

Q3: How do we resolve the seeming contradiction between the last two sentences? If we do not conduct business with a muchram, how then can we deal with him a little, enough for his subsistence?

YE: Perhaps it means that we do not enter into ongoing business dealings (partnerships, major deals etc.) - but may conduct one-time dealings which he needs for his own subsistence.

Rambam, Copyright (c) 1999 Project Genesis, Inc.



View Complete List

It's Never Too Late
Rabbi Pinchas Avruch - 5766

The Real Story
Rabbi Yaakov Menken - 5763

The Strong and the Weak
Rabbi Berel Wein - 5767

Looking for a Chavrusah?

Lets End The Blame Game
Rabbi Naftali Reich - 5774

Not Just Trappings
Rabbi Yaakov Menken - 5762

Yosef Recognizes His Brothers
Rabbi Berel Wein - 5773


The War Against Error-ism
Rabbi Eliyahu Hoffmann - 5762

8 - The Symbol of Eternity
Rabbi Label Lam - 5773

Ya’akov/Yisrael – What’s in Two Names?
Rabbi Eliyahu Hoffmann - 5768

Frumster - Orthodox Jewish Dating

What Miracle?
Rabbi Yaakov Menken - 5760

Feeling the Impact
Rabbi Shlomo Jarcaig - 5764

Yetzer Hara - Friend or Foe?
Rabbi Eliyahu Hoffmann - 5760

> Your Yetzer Hara!
Rabbi Label Lam - 5770

Oh Brother
Rabbi Pinchas Winston - 5758

Behind the Gray Blur
Rabbi Naftali Reich - 5768

Majesty Resides Within!
Rabbi Label Lam - 5765

Project Genesis Home

Torah Portion

Jewish Law



Learn the Basics




Ask The Rabbi

Knowledge Base


About Us

Contact Us

Free Book on Geulah! Home Copyright Information