Torah.org Home Subscribe Services Support Us
 
Print Version

Email this article to a friend
Rambam

Rambam

Rabbi Yitzchok Etshalom
Talmud Torah 7:5

5. The *Muchram* (person under *Herem* - a more severe form of ostracism) is even more [restricted] - he does not teach others, nor do they teach him -however, he may teach himself, in order not to forget his learning. He may not be hired, nor may he hire others. We do not conduct business with him. We only deal with him a little, enough for his subsistence.

Q1: Why does Rambam say that the *Muchram* may study? Isn't that obvious?

YE: Not so obvious. Remember that the prohibitions of a *Menudeh* and *Muchram* are connected to (and, perhaps, derived from) the prohibitions of an *Avel* (mourner). A mourner is prohibited from any Torah study - even on his own. Therefore, we reasonably might have concluded that the same is true for the *Muchram*.

Why indeed is it different? The Avel's avoidance of Torah study is based upon the notion that Torah study is a source (the best source!) of happiness. "The statutes of the Lord are straight, _gladdening_the_heart" (Tehillim [Psalms] 19). Although the *Muchram* acts similarly to the mourner, that is chiefly in those activities which affect his social interaction - he isn't really prohibited from "joyous" activities.

In addition, unlike the mourner, whose situation was thrust upon him and who bears no direct responsibility for it - the *Muchram* has caused his own distancing and disgrace. What better way to become motivated to repair that disgrace than through the study of Torah!

Another reason - the mourner only avoids Torah study for a week; the *Herem* may be in effect much longer.

Q2: Why does Rambam qualify the permit for the *Muchram* to study - "...in order not to forget his learning."?

YE: Perhaps Rambam is addressing the previous question - and favoring the last answer (i.e. due to the potential length of the *Herem*, he may forget his learning - which is inapplicable to a mourner).

RD (Rick Dinitz):
Here's another question about this passage:

Q3: How do we resolve the seeming contradiction between the last two sentences? If we do not conduct business with a muchram, how then can we deal with him a little, enough for his subsistence?

YE: Perhaps it means that we do not enter into ongoing business dealings (partnerships, major deals etc.) - but may conduct one-time dealings which he needs for his own subsistence.

Rambam, Copyright (c) 1999 Project Genesis, Inc.

 






ARTICLES ON REEH:

View Complete List

Absolute Security
Rabbi Pinchas Avruch - 5762

No Middle Road
Shlomo Katz - 5763

Don't Give It Personally
Rabbi Yochanan Zweig - 5772

ArtScroll

Soldiers or Do-Gooders?
Rabbi Aron Tendler - 5760

Seeing Clearly
Rabbi Berel Wein - 5772

To Reach The Stars
Rabbi Label Lam - 5764

> Needs and Desires
Rabbi Mordechai Kamenetzky - 5761

Today’s Choice
Shlomo Katz - 5774

Life Choices
Shlomo Katz - 5765

Looking for a Chavrusah?

Opportunity for Blessing
Rabbi Chaim Flom - 5767

What Yichus!
Rabbi Aron Tendler - 5759

Who Do You Trust?
Rabbi Raymond Beyda - 5766

Frumster - Orthodox Jewish Dating

Total Control
Rabbi Mordechai Kamenetzky - 5760

To Hear and To See
Rabbi Aron Tendler - 5765

To See or Not to See
Rabbi Pinchas Winston - 5758

From Hand to Heart
Rabbi Eliyahu Hoffmann - 5760



Project Genesis

Torah.org Home


Torah Portion

Jewish Law

Ethics

Texts

Learn the Basics

Seasons

Features

TORAHAUDIO

Ask The Rabbi

Knowledge Base




Help

About Us

Contact Us



Free Book on Geulah!




Torah.org Home
Torah.org HomeCapalon.com Copyright Information