Torah.org Home Subscribe Services Support Us
 
Print Version

Email this article to a friend
Rambam

Rambam

Rabbi Yitzchok Etshalom
Talmud Torah 7:5

5. The *Muchram* (person under *Herem* - a more severe form of ostracism) is even more [restricted] - he does not teach others, nor do they teach him -however, he may teach himself, in order not to forget his learning. He may not be hired, nor may he hire others. We do not conduct business with him. We only deal with him a little, enough for his subsistence.

Q1: Why does Rambam say that the *Muchram* may study? Isn't that obvious?

YE: Not so obvious. Remember that the prohibitions of a *Menudeh* and *Muchram* are connected to (and, perhaps, derived from) the prohibitions of an *Avel* (mourner). A mourner is prohibited from any Torah study - even on his own. Therefore, we reasonably might have concluded that the same is true for the *Muchram*.

Why indeed is it different? The Avel's avoidance of Torah study is based upon the notion that Torah study is a source (the best source!) of happiness. "The statutes of the Lord are straight, _gladdening_the_heart" (Tehillim [Psalms] 19). Although the *Muchram* acts similarly to the mourner, that is chiefly in those activities which affect his social interaction - he isn't really prohibited from "joyous" activities.

In addition, unlike the mourner, whose situation was thrust upon him and who bears no direct responsibility for it - the *Muchram* has caused his own distancing and disgrace. What better way to become motivated to repair that disgrace than through the study of Torah!

Another reason - the mourner only avoids Torah study for a week; the *Herem* may be in effect much longer.

Q2: Why does Rambam qualify the permit for the *Muchram* to study - "...in order not to forget his learning."?

YE: Perhaps Rambam is addressing the previous question - and favoring the last answer (i.e. due to the potential length of the *Herem*, he may forget his learning - which is inapplicable to a mourner).

RD (Rick Dinitz):
Here's another question about this passage:

Q3: How do we resolve the seeming contradiction between the last two sentences? If we do not conduct business with a muchram, how then can we deal with him a little, enough for his subsistence?

YE: Perhaps it means that we do not enter into ongoing business dealings (partnerships, major deals etc.) - but may conduct one-time dealings which he needs for his own subsistence.

Rambam, Copyright (c) 1999 Project Genesis, Inc.

 
Sell Chometz Online







ARTICLES ON KEDOSHIM AND PESACH:

View Complete List

Love of Money, or Money of Love?
Rabbi Gavriel Prero - 5761

Relating the Chain of Events: Part 3
Rabbi Yehudah Prero - 5755

Beyond Common (In)Cense
Rabbi Pinchas Winston - 5758

> Kid Tips
Rabbi Yehudah Prero - 5755

Holy Kitchen, Holy Sidewalk, Holy Workplace
Rabbi Berel Wein - 5765

Too Familiar
Shlomo Katz - 5766

ArtScroll

A Reservoir of Love
Rabbi Label Lam - 5766

Forget Your Belt...
Rabbi Moshe Peretz Gilden - 5762

Good ‘Till the Last Drop
Rabbi Label Lam - 5769

Frumster - Orthodox Jewish Dating

A Ritual Memory Transfer
Rabbi Berel Wein - 5760

Thanks for Everything
Rabbi Yehudah Prero - 5766

The Senior Partner
Rabbi Raymond Beyda - 5767

Looking for a Chavrusah?

Aaron's Unlimited Access
Shlomo Katz - 5758

The Great Shabbos
Rabbi Berel Wein - 5768

Feeling Jewish
Rabbi Berel Wein - 5774

To Be Chosen Again
Rabbi Label Lam - 5768



Project Genesis

Torah.org Home


Torah Portion

Jewish Law

Ethics

Texts

Learn the Basics

Seasons

Features

TORAHAUDIO

Ask The Rabbi

Knowledge Base




Help

About Us

Contact Us



Free Book on Geulah!




Torah.org Home
Torah.org HomeCapalon.com Copyright Information