Torah.org Home Subscribe Services Support Us
 
Print Version

Email this article to a friend
Rambam

Rambam

Rabbi Yitzchok Etshalom
Talmud Torah 7:5

5. The *Muchram* (person under *Herem* - a more severe form of ostracism) is even more [restricted] - he does not teach others, nor do they teach him -however, he may teach himself, in order not to forget his learning. He may not be hired, nor may he hire others. We do not conduct business with him. We only deal with him a little, enough for his subsistence.

Q1: Why does Rambam say that the *Muchram* may study? Isn't that obvious?

YE: Not so obvious. Remember that the prohibitions of a *Menudeh* and *Muchram* are connected to (and, perhaps, derived from) the prohibitions of an *Avel* (mourner). A mourner is prohibited from any Torah study - even on his own. Therefore, we reasonably might have concluded that the same is true for the *Muchram*.

Why indeed is it different? The Avel's avoidance of Torah study is based upon the notion that Torah study is a source (the best source!) of happiness. "The statutes of the Lord are straight, _gladdening_the_heart" (Tehillim [Psalms] 19). Although the *Muchram* acts similarly to the mourner, that is chiefly in those activities which affect his social interaction - he isn't really prohibited from "joyous" activities.

In addition, unlike the mourner, whose situation was thrust upon him and who bears no direct responsibility for it - the *Muchram* has caused his own distancing and disgrace. What better way to become motivated to repair that disgrace than through the study of Torah!

Another reason - the mourner only avoids Torah study for a week; the *Herem* may be in effect much longer.

Q2: Why does Rambam qualify the permit for the *Muchram* to study - "...in order not to forget his learning."?

YE: Perhaps Rambam is addressing the previous question - and favoring the last answer (i.e. due to the potential length of the *Herem*, he may forget his learning - which is inapplicable to a mourner).

RD (Rick Dinitz):
Here's another question about this passage:

Q3: How do we resolve the seeming contradiction between the last two sentences? If we do not conduct business with a muchram, how then can we deal with him a little, enough for his subsistence?

YE: Perhaps it means that we do not enter into ongoing business dealings (partnerships, major deals etc.) - but may conduct one-time dealings which he needs for his own subsistence.

Rambam, Copyright (c) 1999 Project Genesis, Inc.

Please Support TORAH.ORG
Print Version       Email this article to a friend

 

ARTICLES ON CHAYEI SARAH:

View Complete List

A Step Down - A Step Up
Rabbi Yisroel Ciner - 5762

Beauty and Grace
Rabbi Aron Tendler - 5765

Thanks, But No Thanks
Rabbi Eliyahu Hoffmann - 5761

ArtScroll

Say Little, and Do Much
Rabbi Dovid Green - 5759

Of Time and Space
Rabbi Aron Tendler - 5764

Seeing Through the Cover
Rabbi Shlomo Jarcaig - 5763

Email Sponsorship

The Water Test
Rabbi Yaakov Menken - 5762

The Power of Chinuch
Rabbi Pinchas Winston - 5769

The Gift that Keeps on Giving!
Rabbi Label Lam - 5763

The Everything Torah Book

The Final Test
Rabbi Frand - 5768

The Rising Waters of Menchlichkeit
Rabbi Mordechai Kamenetzky - 5757

A Slip Of The Tongue Can Mean The Difference Between Life and Death
Rabbi Yissocher Frand - 5765

Eliezer Rules!!
Rabbi Mordechai Kamenetzky - 5760

Too Far East
Rabbi Pinchas Winston - 5767

Say Little, But Do a Lot
Rabbi Yisroel Ciner - 5758

Yitzchak's Dimension As Patriarch
Rabbi Yosef Kalatzky - 5765


Learning Events and Programs

Project Genesis

Torah.org Home


Torah Portion

Jewish Law

Ethics

Texts

Learn the Basics

Seasons

Features

TORAHAUDIO

Ask The Rabbi

Knowledge Base

Discussion Forum




Help

About Us

Contact Us


Enable popup menus


Download to my HandHeld


Torah.org Home
Torah.org HomeCapalon.com Copyright Information