Rambam
Rabbi Yitzchok Etshalom
Talmud Torah 7:6
6. If someone was under *Nidui* for thirty days and did not ask
to for the ban to be lifted, we declare a second *Nidui*. If he
sat [in *Nidui*] for another thirty days and [still] did not ask
for the ban to be lifted, we put him in *Herem*.
Q1: Why is the *Menudeh*'s lack of interest in getting the ban
lifted cause for another ban?
HH: If he had repented, he would have asked for forgiveness.
YE: Just to add to Harald's words:
A component of the violation which led to *Nidui* was attitudinal
- towards the sages and/or the community (see our posting at TT
6:14, Q8). If the *Menudeh* is unmoved by the ban, such that he
doesn't care enough to be reintegrated into the community _and_
reaccepted by the sages - that is a continuation of the same
negative and destructive attitude that led to the first *Nidui*.
Q2: If he is not concerned or moved by being in *Nidui* - how
will a second *Nidui* or *Herem* be any different?
HH: Repentance needs time. Besides, the punishment of being cast
out from the community becomes more and more painful as the
separation lasts longer and longer.
Rambam, Copyright (c) 1999 Project
Genesis, Inc.