Rabbi Frand on Parshas Toldos
These divrei Torah were adapted from the hashkafa portion of Rabbi Yissocher Frand's Commuter Chavrusah Tapes on the weekly portion: Tape # 169, The
Blind in Halacha. Good Shabbos!
Clothing Alone Do Not Make the Man
This week's parsha contains the story of Yakov and Eisav, the two brothers
who went their different ways. Yakov was righteous and Eisav was wicked.
The Rabbis teach that although Eisav was wicked, there was one thing that he
did extremely well. His performance of the command to honor parents was
exemplary. He was a 'chosid' at performing this mitzvah.
The Medrash Rabbah records that the Tanna, Rabban Shimeon ben Gamliel,
bemoaned the fact that although he served his father his entire life, his
actions did not measure up to even one percent of what Eisav did for
Yitzchak, his father.
"When I served my father, I served him in my regular, dirty clothes; but when
I went out in public, I would wear clean (e.g. -- distinguished) clothing.
However, Eisav would only serve his father wearing royal clothing as if he
was serving a king..."
Rav Shimeon ben Gamliel was bemoaning his inability to serve his father
properly. The Succas Dovid asks a simple question: there was an easy
solution -- Rav Shimeon ben Gamliel should have simply worn his good
clothing when he served his father!
The answer is that Rav Shimeon ben Gamliel was not bemoaning his inability to
wear good clothing. He was bemoaning the attitude difference between Eisav
and himself. He certainly could have worn good clothing, but that would have
been a hollow act. Eisav wore royal clothing for his father because he sensed
that he was dealing with a king when he dealt with his father. Rav Shimeon
ben Gamliel was not bemoaning the fact that he was missing the clothing -- he
was bemoaning the fact that he was missing the sensitivity and emotion that
Eisav felt for Yitzchak.
We can, in fact, interpret the Talmud in Yoma [47a] in the same way. The
Talmud records that Kimchas had 7 sons who all became High Priests. She
attributed this merit to the fact that "all my life, the rafters of my house
never saw my hair". She was so modest that even in the confines of her own
home, she never removed her hair covering.
The Talmud comments, "Many women attempted to imitate Kimchas, but they did
not have her success". Why? The answer is the same.
It was not covering her hair per se that produced High Priests. Modesty is
a reaction to an inner feeling that "I am in the Presence of G-d". If a
[married] woman would feel that she is always in the Presence of the Master
of the World, then she would naturally never uncover her hair. But the act
of simply covering the hair in the total privacy of one's home, when it is
not because of the feeling of "I have set Hashem before me always..."
[Tehillim 16:8] is merely a hollow act which will not produce High Priests.
This is a concept that we must contemplate. Sometimes there are things that
we do that cause us to feel good and right and religious. Yet, we must ask
ourselves -- are we just doing the act, or are we doing that which is behind
the act? It is not good enough to merely wear clothes or to do things that
perhaps make us look more religious or feel more religious. We need the
emotions and the feelings behind those acts to be the inspiration for the
feeling of religiosity.
Glossary
chosid -- exceptionally pious
Tanna -- Rabbinical personality from the time of the Mishneh.
Brochos -- Blessings
This week's write-up is adapted from the hashkafa portion of Rabbi Yissochar
Frand's Commuter Chavrusah Torah Tapes on the weekly Torah portion (#169).
The corresponding halachic portion for this tape is: The Blind in Halacha.
The other halachic portions for Parshas Toldos from the Commuter Chavrusah
Series are:
Also Available: Mesorah / Artscroll has published a collection
of Rabbi Frand's essays. The book is entitled:
and is available through your local Hebrew book store or from
Project Genesis, 1-410-654-1799.
