Rabbi Frand On Parshas Chukas
These divrei Torah were adapted from the hashkafa portion of Rabbi
Yissocher Frand's Commuter Chavrusah Tapes on the weekly portion: Tape
#467, Detached Limbs and Tumah. Good Shabbos!
The Connection Between The Parah Adumah and the Golden Mean
The Shaloh haKadosh writes that it is impossible to fathom the secrets of
Parah Adumah [Red Heifer]. Nevertheless, he says, a person should try to
understand whatever lessons he is able to derive from this quintessential
'chok' [non-rational law] of the Torah.
The most perplexing aspect of this procedure is that on the one hand it
purifies those who are impure, and, on the other hand, it contaminates
those who were previously pure. [Certain methods of handling the mixture
result in the Kohen and/or his clothing becoming tameh.] The Shaloh links
this paradox of the Parah Adumah to a principle that Maimonides introduces
regarding a person's character traits.
The Rambam writes that a person should always try to follow the "Golden
Mean" in every human emotion and character trait. In general, extremes
are not good. However, the Rambam qualifies this rule by stating that if
a person has a particular character defect which causes him to deviate
from the "middle road" in one direction, the way to correct this
deficiency is to overcompensate in the other direction -- by going to
the opposite extreme for some period of time.
For example, if a person is overly miserly, the way to correct that is
to go to the other extreme and temporarily be overly generous. If a
person is overly frivolous, he should compensate by acting overly
serious for a time.
The Shaloh restates this prescription of the Rambam by noting that if a
person had been a "tahor" -- namely one who was behaving properly along
the middle road -- and then he went to an extreme, such a practice would
contaminate him. However, a person who was not behaving properly and had
deviated in one direction, may in fact become "purified" by going to the
opposite extreme for a time, and thus reestablishing his equilibrium.
The Parah Adumah is an example of something that can be poison to a
"healthy" person, but is nevertheless therapeutic to a person who is
"ill". The person who is tameh needs the ashes of the Parah Adumah. He
is "sick" and this is therapeutic for him. But a person who is healthy
who engages in something which is therapeutic for an ill person, may in
fact contaminate himself.
This exactly parallels the Rambam's advice regarding character traits:
Extremism may be appropriate for someone who is already dysfunctional
but extremism is destructive for a healthy normally functioning
individual.
Effective Leadership Requires Being Able To Move Out Of The Picture
The parsha contains the "Song of the Well" [Bamidbar 21:17-20]. This
song is symmetrical with the "Song of the Sea" in Parshas BeShalach.
Two weeks ago, we read Parshas Shlach, which includes the sending out of
the spies. This week we read Parshas Chukas. The common perception is
that from the point in the Biblical narration of Parshas Chukas, the
sending out of the spies happened "just two weeks ago." In reality, 38
years transpired between the narrations of the two parshiyos. This is
something we often fail to recognize. Parshas Chukas is discussing a
totally new generation of Jews, since the entire generation (aged 20 -
60) of Jews from Parshas Shlach had already died. The last few Parshiyos
of the Torah, from Chukas onward, all occur during the last year of the
40-year sojourn in the wilderness.
The beginning of the sojourn in the wilderness began with a song: "Then
sang Moshe and the Children of Israel this song..." [Shmos 15:1]. The
song recounts the miracles that happened to them at the beginning of the
sojourn. Almost 40 years later, the sojourn in the wilderness is about
to end, with another song. The Song of the Well recounts the miracles
that happened to the Children of Israel at the end of their 40-year
sojourn. We clearly have symmetry between the two songs. They even both
begin with the same words: Az Yashir (Then sang). However there is one
glaring difference. "Moshe and the Children of Israel" sang the first
song. The Song of the Well was only sung by "Israel", not by Moshe.
The Rishonim mention this. They explain that Moshe's name was not
mentioned in conjuction with the Song of the Well because the Well was a
"sore spot" for Moshe. The Well was related to his sin at Mei Merivah, for
which Moshe was denied entry into Eretz Yisroel. Therefore, it is better
for Moshe not to be mentioned in connection with the Well.
The Shemen HaTov provides another reason for the omission of Moshe's
name from this song. It was not to protect Moshe Rabbeinu. On the
contrary, Moshe's name is omitted as the greatest "silent" testimony to
the effectiveness of Moshe as a leader.
The greatest accomplishment that a leader can claim for himself is that
he has left his people, and yet they are able to function on their own. A
leader who has created a situation that without him, his nation does not
know how they will be able to function, has not been totally effective.
No one lives forever. There must be some kind of provision for what will
be after the leader. The leader must light the candle so that the flame
can then rise up and burn on its own.
At the beginning of the sojourn, the Jews were like children who needed
to be held by the hand. Without the active participation of Moshe, they
were lost. They grew and accomplished during those 40 years. They no
longer needed Moshe to lead them in song praising the Almighty. They
were spiritually mature enough to sing the song on their own.
In a certain sense, this is not only the job of a leader, this is the job
of a parent as well. Truly effective parenting is creating a situation
where parents instill in their children the capability to grow on their
own. When a parent sees that his child is self-sufficient, that he has
absorbed good character traits as his own -- then a parent can see that he
has been effective. If even after they have grown up, the parent is still
the one who has to remind them and prod them and push them, then to a
certain extent the parent has not been fully successful.
The Torah is hinting to Moshe's success, by indicating that the Children
of Israel were now capable of singing the Song of the Well, without
help.
Transcribed by David Twersky; Seattle, WA DavidATwersky@aol.com
Technical Assistance by Dovid Hoffman; Baltimore, MD dhoffman@torah.org
This week's write-up is adapted from the hashkafa portion of Rabbi
Yissocher Frand's Commuter Chavrusah Torah Tapes on the weekly Torah
portion. The complete list of halachic portions for this parsha from the
Commuter Chavrusah Series are:
Tape # 018 -- Rending Garments on Seeing Yerushalayim
Tape # 063 -- Intermarriage
Tape # 107 -- Rabbonim and Roshei Yeshiva -- Do Sons Inherit?
Tape # 152 -- Halachic Considerations of Transplanted Organs
Tape # 199 -- Stam Yeinam: Non Kosher Wines
Tape # 245 -- Skin Grafts
Tape # 335 -- Postponing a Funeral
Tape # 379 -- The Jewish "Shabbos Goy"
Tape # 423 -- Tefilah of a Tzadik for a Choleh
Tape # 467 -- Detached Limbs and Tumah
Tape # 511 -- Autopsies and Insurance
Tape # 555 -- Women Fasting on 17th of Tamuz, Tisha B'Av and Yom Kippur
Tapes or a complete catalogue can be ordered from the
Yad Yechiel Institute, PO Box 511, Owings Mills MD 21117-0511.
Call (410) 358-0416 or e-mail tapes@yadyechiel.org or visit
http://www.yadyechiel.org/ for further information.
Text Copyright © 2004 by Rabbi Yissocher Frand and Torah.org.
Transcribed by David Twersky; Seattle, Washington.
Technical Assistance by Dovid Hoffman; Yerushalayim.
Rav Frand Books and Audio Tapes are now available for sale! Thanks to www.yadyechiel.org and Artscroll.com.