Parshas Naso
The Common Denominator Between Long Hair and A Shaven Head
This week's parsha contains the laws of Nazirus. A Nazir is a person who
accepts upon himself an added level of holiness. As a result of this added
kedusha, the Nazir is prohibited from consuming wine or any wine products,
he is forbidden from having anything to do with dead bodies, and he also
must grow his hair long.
The Sefer HaChinuch (Mitzvah 374) has a far ranging discussion on the
significance of letting the hair grow long. The Sefer HaChinuch writes
that a human being is comprised of body and intellect, the physical and
the spiritual. In truth, the soul and the spiritual side of a human being
longs for pure spirituality. It really does not want to be tied down and
bothered by all the physical aspects of what it means to be a human being.
But, given the reality of life, it is necessary to provide for the needs
of the body. Just as a valuable item placed in a house, can only be
properly guarded and protected if the house is maintained (If the house is
not kept up, it will eventually collapse and the treasure will be lost.)
the same is true of the neshama [soul]. The neshama is inside a human
body, which must be tended to. The body must be appropriately fed and
nurtured.
Jews are not ascetics. We do not deny the needs of our bodies, but rather
take care of our physical side as well. The "house" cannot exist without
paying attention to it. The Nazir, however, wants to make a statement and
tone down his physical side. He does this by neglecting – to some extent –
the needs of his body. He chooses a very appropriate manner to tone down
his physical side without harming that physical body in an appreciable
way. He does this by abstaining from wine, because wine is not an absolute
physical necessity. Along the same lines, he lets his hair grow. The
Chinuch writes that one's hair can become a tremendous attraction. It is
something a person might "get into". By letting his hair grow long, a
person separates himself from physicality.
The Chinuch quotes the Gemara [Nedarim 9b] regarding the single Nazir that
Shimon HaTzadik felt was worthy enough to eat from his sacrifice. Shimon
HaTzadik inquired of a young nazir why he decided to take upon himself
nazirus. The shepherd explained how he had once seen his reflection in the
water and became infatuated with his appearance. He became a Nazir -–
first growing his hair long and wild and then shaving it off entirely -–
to minimize his preoccupation with his physical appearance.
The Chinuch explains that both the process of growing the hair long and
then the process of shaving his head entirely accomplish the same purpose.
The common denominator between these two processes is that they diminish
man's appearance –- they make him look like less of a "mensch". When we
see someone whose hair is all wild, our reaction is "he's not a mensch".
We have the same reaction when we see someone who shaves his head totally
bald.
Rav Matisyahu Solomon once observed that this idea of the Sefer HaChinuch
would seem to fly in the face of a commonly observed phenomenon in the
modern world. If long hair or no hair is somehow a contradiction to the
natural image of a human being, why is it that today we see so many people
going around with either excessively long hair or a purposely shaved head?
Do these people not agree with the premise of the Chinuch that such
appearance "spoils the countenance of man"?
Rav Matisyahu answers that, in fact, the tables are turned today. Today's
yetzer hara [evil inclination] is to say: I don't need to be a mensch
[normal human being]. I don't want to act like a mensch. Today's lust is
to say "I can do whatever I want!" Human dignity comes with certain
responsibilities. Those responsibilities are rejected by many today and
they purposely throw away human dignity, knowing full well that this
dignity comes as a "package deal" with the responsibilities of being a
decent human being. Today, nobody wants to be like a mensch because if
you're not a mensch, you can do whatever you want.
Charity Is The Best Investment
------------------------------
Prior to the chapter of the Sotah [unfaithful wife] [Bamdibar 5:10], the
Torah writes about giving the priestly gifts to the Kohen: "A man's holies
shall be his, and what a man gives to the Kohen shall be his." The
concluding words "lo yiheyeh" [to him they shall be] are somewhat
ambiguous. The Kohen is the antecedent (reference) of the pronoun "lo
yiheyeh" [To him they shall be]. However if the intent of the pasuk
[verse] is to say they will belong to the Kohen, the pasuk is constructed
in both a round-about and redundant fashion.
The reading of the pasuk also tolerates the interpretation that the words
"lo yiheyeh" refer not to the Kohen, but to the person who gives the gifts
to the Kohen. That, however raises a logical problem, because if one gives
something to the Kohen, it is not his anymore.
Rashi, in fact recognizes the problematic sentence structure and comments
that there are many medrashic interpretations to the pasuk.
Rav Bezalel Zolty cites a true story that precisely explains this pasuk.
Rav Moshe Mordechai Epstein, Rosh Yeshiva of Slabodka, came to the United
States in 1924 to collect money. While he was here, he received a telegram
from the "Alter" [Elder] of Slabodka that the Lithuanian government was
going to draft all the Yeshivas students into the Lithuanian army. This
would have been a death sentence for all of those students, if not in a
physical sense, then certainly in a spiritual sense.
The "Alter" told Rav Moshe Mordechai that he was sending 150 students from
Slabodka to Palestine to start a Yeshiva in Eretz Yisrael. For this
massive undertaking, he needed 25,000 dollars – a huge sum in those days.
Rav Epstein went to a wealthy Jew from a Manhattan banking family, named
Schiff. Rav Epstein told Mr. Schiff about the situation and expected a
nice donation. Mr. Schiff wrote a check for the entire sum.
In the depression (1929), Mr. Schiff lost his entire fortune. In the
1930s, Rav Moshe Mordechai was already not well and could not make the
trip to America. He sent his son-in-law, Rav Chatzkel Sarna to come to New
York to collect money for the Slabodka Yeshiva. Rav Sarna came to America
in the early 1930s, the height of the depression. Mr. Schiff lost
everything he had in the stock market and everything he had in the real
estate market. Inded, he was then living in the basement of a building he
once owned.
However, Mr. Schiff came to speak at a parlor meeting held in New York on
behalf of the Slabodka yeshiva. At the parlor meeting, Mr. Schiff said
that of all the investments that he ever owned -– the real estate, the
stocks, everything –- the only investment that he still had was the
$25,000 he gave 10 years earlier to the Slabodka yeshiva. Everything else
he lost. He can only look at the Yeshiva in Eretz Yisrael that had young
Torah students learning and say "That is my investment; that still
delivers great dividends to me and my family." He told the assembled
parlor meeting that the only money that one has that is guaranteed is the
money that one gives to charity.
In light of this story, we may gain new insight into the previously quoted
pasuk from our parsha. "And a man who gives his offerings to the Kohen,
they will be to him". Indeed although he gave them away to the Kohen, they
remain to him, as a merit and as an eternal investment.
No one can ever take that investment away from him. The dot coms can get
delisted and the brokerage houses can fail. One's stock portfolio can drop
in value to virtually nothing. But there is one thing that a person keeps
forever. The money a man gives to charity –- lo yiheyeh –- will remain his
forever.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Transcribed by David Twersky; Seattle, WA DavidATwersky@aol.com
Technical Assistance by Dovid Hoffman; Baltimore, MD dhoffman@torah.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This week's write-up is adapted from the hashkafa portion of Rabbi
Yissocher Frand's Commuter Chavrusah Torah Tapes on the weekly Torah
portion. The complete list of halachic portions for this parsha from the
Commuter Chavrusah Series are:
Tape # 014 - The prohibition of Yichud
Tape # 059 - Sheitels: A Woman's Obligation to Cover Her Hair
Tape # 103 - Birchas Kohanim
Tape # 148 - Sotah: The Case of the Unfaithful Wife
Tape # 195 - Birchas Kohanim: Who Can and Who Can't?
Tape # 241 - Yichud and the Housekeeper
Tape # 285 - Sa'ar B'isha Ervah
Tape # 331 - Must a Kallah Cover Her Hair at the Chasunah?
Tape # 375 - Ain Osin Mitzvos Chavilos
Tape # 419 - Causing the Erasure of Hashem's Name
Tape # 463 - Dee'chui Eitzel Mitzvos
Tape # 507 - The Faithful Unfaithful Wife
Tape # 551 – Being Motzi a Wife in Kiddush
Tape # 595 – Chazonim and Chazanus
Tape # 639 – The Unfaithful Wife – Is ignorance an Excuse?
Tape # 683 – Shalom Bayis – How Far Can One Go?
Tape # 727 – Singing During Davening – Pro or Con?
Tape # 771 – Ashkenazim, Sephardim and Bishul Akum., 2
Tape # 815 – The Laws of Sotah, Still Very Relevant
Tape # 859 – Walking Behind a Woman
Tapes or a complete catalogue can be ordered from the
Yad Yechiel Institute, PO Box 511, Owings Mills MD 21117-0511.
Call (410) 358-0416 or e-mail tapes@yadyechiel.org or visit
http://www.yadyechiel.org/ for further information.
RavFrand, Copyright © 2007 by Rabbi Yissocher Frand and Torah.org.
Rav Frand Books and Audio Tapes are now available for sale! Thanks to www.yadyechiel.org and Artscroll.com.