Parshas Emor
The Smell of the Esrog Is Equated With The "Smell of Torah"
These divrei Torah were adapted from the hashkafa portion of Rabbi
Yissocher Frand's Commuter Chavrusah Tapes on the weekly portion: Tape #679,
Mrs. Cohen is Having a Baby. Good Shabbos!
Parshas Emor includes the Torah section relating to the Jewish holidays.
Regarding the mitzvah to take the Four Species [Vayikra 23:40], the Baalei
HaTosfos write that one of these four species, the esrog, has both a
pleasant taste and a pleasant aroma. This fruit represents righteous Jews
who have the aroma of Torah and the taste of good deeds. The palm tree, on
which the lulav grows, has pleasant taste but no aroma. This symbolizes the
average Jew who has the pleasant taste of doing mitzvos but does not
necessarily possess the aroma of Torah scholarship. The hadas [myrtle],
with aroma but no taste, symbolizes Jews who have Torah scholarship but do
not possess the pleasant taste of having done good deeds. The arava
[willow], with neither taste nor flavor, symbolizes the Amei Ha'Aretz
[peasants] who have neither the aroma of Torah nor the taste of good deeds.
The Baalei HaTosfos conclude with the well known homiletic teaching: We
bind all four species together to symbolize that G-d is not pleased with
the Jewish people until they bind themselves together as one unit.
Let us analyze the symbolism of the Baalei HaTosfos in equating the aroma
of the esrog and hadas with the aroma of Torah. What does it mean to say
that a Talmid Chochom has the "smell of Torah"? Rav Simcha Zissel makes a
very interesting comment: The Moshiach is described in Yeshaya [11:1-2] as
"an offspring from the great plant of Yishai upon whom will rest the Spirit
of G-d, the spirit of wisdom and discernment, the spirit of counsel and
strength, the spirit of knowledge and Fear of G-d." After all these
accolades describing the Moshiach, the pasuk says [11:3] "and G-d will
cause him to have an aroma (v'heericho) of Fear of Hashem, such that he
will not need to judge by the vision of his eyes nor argue based on that
which he hears with his ears."
This aroma that he will possess will give him the uncanny ability to rule
not only based on his eyes and ears but even with that special quality of
aroma that G-d will grant him. What is this idea of "V'heericho"?
The Ramba"n in his Torah commentary on the pasuk "And you shall do that
which is straight and proper in the Eyes of Hashem" [Devorim 6:18] explains
this mitzvah as attempting to ascertain the true Will of the Almighty
behind each of the 613 mitzvos. Even regarding the things which we are not
explicitly commanded, we should try our hardest to do that which we feel is
right and proper in His Eyes, for He Loves that which is good and straight.
Even if something does not appear in the list of mitzvos and does not
appear in the Shulchan Aruch [Code of Jewish Law], we have an obligation as
Jews to try to understand what the Almighty really wants from us. The
Moshiach is going to be gifted with this intuitive knowledge of what the
Almighty really wants. G-d will infuse him with this innate almost
instinctive knowledge of what He really wants. Therefore, there will be
cases appearing before him that do not appear in Shulchan Aruch and yet he
will know what to do despite the lack of any legal precedent. He will have
the "aroma of the Almighty" about him. He is so permeated by the Spirit of
Hashem that he will be able to smell what is right and what is wrong.
Why is smell the metaphor for knowledge?
When one walks into a room and his wife is making chicken soup for
Shabbos, he does not need to taste the chicken soup to know what's cooking.
He knows what's cooking. He smells the chicken soup. When there is aroma,
one does not need taste to understand what is there. This is the quality
that Moshiach will have.
This is what the Baalei HaTosfos mean when they speak about the aroma of
Torah (in comparison to the aroma of the esrog or hadas). They mean a
person who has the "sense of smell" of Torah. He can smell what is right
and what is wrong. This is the concept of "Da'as Torah". One who possesses
true "Da'as Torah" has the aroma of Torah such that he can intuit what is
right and what is wrong, even in the absence of clear precedent. He can
perceive what the Torah wants and want the Almighty wants by instinct, as
if by smell.
The Indictment Of Rabbi Akiva's Students
During the period of Sefiras HaOmer, 24,000 students of Rabbi Akiva died.
Our sages say it was because they did not show proper respect for one
another [Yevamos 62b]. This seems to be a rather serious punishment for
such a light offense. Why were they deserving of such harsh judgment?
The Talmud [Kesubos 62b] relates the story of an ignorant shepherd named
Akiva, who Rochel the daughter of the wealthy Kalba Savua wished to marry.
She fell in love with him according to the Gemara, because he was "modest
and a good person". She knew that if he would apply himself to Torah
studies, he would become a great scholar. Her father threatened that he
would disown and disinherit her if she married such an ignoramus. She
married him anyway. They were paupers for 24 years. We know the rest of the
story.
Tosfos in Kesubos ask how it could be that the Gemara there describes
Rabbi Akiva as a "good person" when the Talmud elsewhere [Pessachim 49b]
says that Rabbi Akiva (when he was an ignoramus) used to hate Torah
scholars and would (if he could) bite into them like a donkey. Tosfos
answers that Rabbi Akiva expressed this attitude not out of hatred for
Torah scholars per se, but out of resentment that they kept themselves
aloof from the masses. He perceived (perhaps erroneously) haughtiness on
their part and therefore could not stand such perceived arrogance.
Tosfos means that Akiva was, in fact, a good person so good that he
could not tolerate it when others put on airs and looked down on the
masses. He felt that this was an affront to other (simpler) people and
good person that he was felt an urgency to defend the honor of even
simple people who were ignoramuses.
Given the fact that Rabbi Akiva was such a righteous and pious individual
when it came to defending the rights of even simple ignoramuses, the
critique of his students was all that much greater for not following in
their master's footsteps regarding showing honor for their fellow students.
For that harsh critique, they unfortunately died during the days of Sefiras
haOmer.
This write-up is adapted from the hashkafa portion of Rabbi Yissocher
Frand's Commuter Chavrusah Torah Tapes on the weekly Torah Portion. The
halachic topics covered for the current week's portion in this series are:
Tape # 010 Can Kohanim visit Graves of Tzadikim
Tape # 053 - Are Our Kohanim Really Kohanim?
Tape # 096 - "Kovod Habrios": The Concept of Human Dignity
Tape # 144 - Kohanim in Hospitals: A Real Problem
Tape # 191 - The Bracha for Kiddush Hashem.
Tape # 281 - Kiddush Hashem: Is "Giluy Arayus" Ever Permitted?
Tape # 327 - The Cohain and the Divorcee
Tape # 371 - The Mitzvah of Ve'Kidashto: Honoring Kohanim
Tape # 415 - The Ba'alas Teshuva and the Kohain
Tape # 459 - Eliyahu Hanavi and the "Dead" Child
Tape # 503 - Standing Up While Doing Mitzvos
Tape # 547 The Wayward Daughter
Tape # 591 The Kohain and the Gerusha
Tape # 635 Bracha of Mekadaish Es Shimcha B'rabim
Tape # 679 - Mrs. Cohen is Having A Baby
Tape # 811 Is Adultery Ever Permitted?
Tape # 855 The Brother-in-Law Who Threw Out The Ring
Tape # 944 - Honoring Kohanim−Even Children?
Tapes or a complete catalogue can be ordered from the Yad Yechiel Institute,
PO Box 511, Owings Mills MD 21117-0511. Call (410) 358-0416 or e-mail
tapes@yadyechiel.org or visit http://www.yadyechiel.org/ for further
information.
RavFrand, Copyright © 2007 by Rabbi Yissocher Frand and Torah.org.
Rav Frand Books and Audio Tapes are now available for sale! Thanks to www.yadyechiel.org and Artscroll.com.