Re: Slavery

Russell Hendel (rhendel@mcs.drexel.edu)
Wed, 16 Oct 1996 19:05:43 -0400

Eli Reidler (V2 #80) beautifully points out that by analogy just as
Americans respect and uphold what is in the constitution, so must we, as
Jews, uphold and respect what is in the Torah. In fact it says explicitly
in Proverbs and we recite every week: Her ways our pleasant ways and her
sidepaths are peaceful. It follows that we consider the slavery laws of
the Torah as but one more example of the pleasant and peaceful (humane to
use Eli's own words) laws of Hashem.

I would just like to add to this the approach of **using distinctions and
details**. Slavery by itself is just one word which *could* connote
different things to different people. It may for instance connote the
atrocities mentioned in Uncle Tom's Cabin. However, by using an approach
of distinctions and details we can document *why* we think the Torah is
pleasant.

Slavery is pleasant because the master should...
** give his slave a sample from every new dish he serves in his house
(Slavery,9)
** give equal treatment in food, drinks, cloth and housing
(Rambam,Slavery,end of 1)
** respect the slaves vocational training and not treat him like a rookie
(Slavery,1)
** respect the slaves desire to live in a descent Jewish neighborhood
(Slavery, 8)
** be sensitive to the slaves heightened vulnerability (Slavery 8)
** know that "slavery" in Hebrew simply means "worker" while worker in
Hebrew is "wageearner" (EVD vs SCR).

Thus by using an approach of details and distinctions we have a
*heightened* awareness of our faith in the pleasantness of the Torah.

Perhaps one component of the dictum: An ordinary person (Am Haaretz) cannot
be Pious (literally: Chasidic) --- is that true piety requires an approach
of distinctions and details.

Russell Jay Hendel, Ph.d, ASA, rhendel@mcs.drexel.edu