Re: Blood Sacrifice

Lili Pauli (phenya@ccsg.tau.ac.il)
Thu, 8 Jan 1998 21:19:15 +0200

Darren Hoffman <darrenh@ibm.net>wrote:
<<Why did God accept Abel's offering of an innocent lamb (blood sacrifice)
and not Cain's offering of the fruit of the ground? If the fall of man was
caused by eating fruit, as the church world thinks, why was Cain's
sacrifice rejected?>>

Let me answer the first part with a parable. A man had two sons. One sent
him for father's day a card printed by a professional and signed his name.
The other wrote his own card which took hours to draw and his own poem with
a very personal touch. Now tell me which would the father prefer. Abel gave
from the fatest, choicest lamb. Cain gave from mediocre fruit (grade B or
C). As for the church world thinking the sin was eating fruit that is far
from Jewish traditon which holds that the sin was disobedience to a command.

<<Why were men circumcised, and not their mouths?>>

See the various commentaries on Moses's speach impediment due to the hot
coals test and draw your own conclusions.

With blessings,
Richard (Rachamim) Pauli