Any man from the Bnei Yisrael who will slaughter an ox, a sheep,
or a goat in the camp, or who will slaughter it outside the camp, and he has
not brought it to the entrance of the Ohel Moed to bring it as an
offering to Hashem before the Mishkan Hashem…
Parshas Acharei Mos
Be’er Mayim Chaim - In a well-known attempt to resolve the a contradiction
between passages, Tosafos2 develop a three-tiered system in
regard to intention in the performance of mitzvos. When a person serves
Hashem with the sole intent of pleasing His Creator, he is considered as a
child to his Parent.3 Should he study Torah and perform mitzvos
not for the sake of His Creator, he is regarded not as a child, but as a
Although his service is far from perfect, he can still be regarded at least
as a servant. In performing for the ulterior motive of gaining Divine reward
and escaping the punishment of Heaven, he seems to be not serving Hashem at
all. Seeking reward – and escaping punishment – is really an exercise in
self-service! His point of reference is not G-d, but his own well-being and
comfort. Nonetheless, Hashem does not take such a jaundiced view of this
person’s Torah and mitzvos. Although self-serving, what animates him is the
firm belief that Hashem exists, makes demands upon us, and reliably rewards
those who act according to His dictates. This emunah is significant. It
sufficed to win freedom for our ancestors from Egyptian slavery,4
and suffices for us to win freedom from our own yetzer hora. It is a
wonderful beginning, and can propel a person to the next level up, in which
he serves Hashem entirely for His sake. It is enough for a person to be
considered at least a servant, even if not a loving child.
On the other hand, a person can outwardly serve Hashem without any positive
intent at all. One who learns and serves to gain public acclaim or project
his self-importance does not really serve Hashem at all. He believes that
his success is not a matter of Divine approval or disapproval, so much as a
function of his own efforts. He thus lacks the positive aspects of even the
person who serves Hashem for the purpose of receiving reward from the
outstretched Hand from Above. He is far less than a servant.
All of this is alluded to in our pesukim. “Any man from the Bnei Yisrael
who will slaughter an ox, a sheep, or a goat in the camp… and he has not
brought it … before the Mishkan Hashem…” The Torah speaks of a person who
involves himself in Torah and mitzvos but fails to take them to the
innermost place close to Hashem, i.e. he does not perform them on the
highest level, which is to act for the sake of Heaven, and for no other
reason. Such a person conceivably acts for one of two reasons: “Who will
slaughter … in the camp, or who will slaughter it outside the camp.” On the
one hand, he might act in expectation of some Divine reward. This is far
from perfect, and in a sense enhances the power of evil, since it operates
for a cause that is removed from Hashem’s plan. Nonetheless, he should still
be seen as acting within the camp, rather than outside of it, for two
reasons. Firstly, he is correct in his conviction that Hashem is the Master
of all good phenomena, and holds the future of all things in His hands.
Asserting the truth of this is important and meritorious.
Secondly, the very fact that his frame of reference is HKBH – even if
focusing on His ability to offer rich rewards – means that he operates
within the same “camp” as Hashem. Therefore, from the not lishmah will
ultimately grow the lishmah.
On the other hand, the protagonist of our parshah might act in a way that
should be labeled as outside the camp. He might act merely to enhance his
pride or his image. Worse yet, he might act just to be able to be
disputatious with others. All of these place him outside the general frame
of reference of Hashem’s Will. He is considered outside the camp of kedushah.
The Torah continues with references to both of these contingencies. “To
bring it as an offering to Hashem before the mishkan Hashem.” In other
words, he may be within range of Hashem, but fail to make his actions the
perfect offering to Him, which can only be done when acting completely for
the sake of pleasing Him. Or, he may fail to bring it to the mishkan Hashem
altogether, by substituting the cause of his own ego over any connection to
What is the fate of the person who fails to act with the proper motivation?
Not only is his offering not a genuine offering, but at times he shares in
the responsibility for some much greater evil. “He has shed blood, and that
man shall be cut off from the midst of his people.”5 Other
people are attracted, in a perverse manner, to his imperfection. Those
people sometimes go further in their failings, and commit serious
transgressions, standing to a certain extent on his shoulders.
He can therefore bears some responsibility – at times, for crimes as
serious as bloodshed.
1. Based on Be’er Mayim Chaim, Vayikra 17:3-4
2. Taanis 7A
3. Bava Basra 10A
4. Yalkut Shimoni 240
5. End of Vayikra 17:4
A Fresh Start
Rabbi Yochanan Zweig - 5770
Torah Vs. TV
Rabbi Yaakov Menken - 5759
Who was Moshe Rabbeinu?
Rabbi Pinchas Winston - 5759
After Six Comes Seven
Rabbi Yisroel Ciner - 5762
The Auction of The Year!
Rabbi Aron Tendler - 5760
Deadline: The Year 6000
Rabbi Yisroel Ciner - 5760
The Truth Warms a Sukkah!
Rabbi Label Lam - 5772
Rabbi Moshe Peretz Gilden - 5766
Succah: Strictly Under Divine Supervision
Rabbi Osher Chaim Levene - 5767
Huts or Houses
Rabbi Yehudah Prero - 5759
The Joy of Living in a Sukka
Rabbi Berel Wein - 5775
Rabbi Berel Wein - 5767
The Light is Yours
Shlomo Katz - 5776
Somebody's a Nobody
Rabbi Mordechai Kamenetzky - 5759
-- And Some Good Food, Too!
Rabbi Label Lam - 5764
A Happiness of Oneness
Rabbi Yehudah Prero - 5758