Parshas Balak
Devekus is the Antidote1
The Zohar sees Bilam’s plot as posing a security risk without peer. “From
the time of creation, never did Klal Yisrael need the intervention of HKBH
as much as the day that Bilam sought to curse them.”2 Does the Zohar really mean to reduce the Exodus from
Egypt to a stroll in the park, and the splitting of the Reed Sea to a
garden-variety miracle? Surely there were more critical moments in our
history than Bilam’s attempt to co-opt spirituality for his nefarious
purposes!
Perhaps those moments do seem more critical, but only until one
understands the ultimate reason that Bnei Yisrael were saved so
dramatically. In an oft-cited passage in Moreh Nevuchim,3 Rambam writes that it is impossible for
any mishap to befall a person while he is perfectly attached to Hashem.
Such a state is not maintained around the clock by even great people.
Thus, even tzadikim and chassidim sometimes must deal with
unhappy circumstances – but only at the times that they do not maintain
their devekus.
The fortunes of our nation parallel this. We are assured of invincibility
when our national attachment to HKBH is intact and strong. Compromising
this attachment makes us vulnerable to a host of problems. It removes the
impregnable shield between catastrophe and ourselves. In a word, Bilam’s
hope was to disrupt this connection, and therefore leave us endangered and
defenseless.
Chazal point to the role parallel to that of Moshe that Bilam could have
played for the nations of the world. On a deeper level, Moshe and Bilam
were mirror images of each other. According to the seforim
hakedoshim, Moshe represents da’as. True attachment is part
and parcel of da’as. (The Torah describes the connection between
Adam and Chava before their sin using the verb form of da’as.4 ) Bilam represents the negative side of
da’as – da’as of the kelipah, the “shells” and
barriers that block kedushah from shining through.5 Possessing this gift put him in a unique position.
Balak, no stranger to theurgic manipulation, nonetheless understood that
he was powerless to accomplish his goals. He needed Bilam. Bilam’s
penetrating wisdom of the negative enabled him to find ways to disrupt the
devekus between Klal Yisrael and Hashem.6
Bilam’s plan – indeed all the details of the parshah – follow
elegantly from this premise. Wishing to disrupt the devekus
between Klal Yisrael and our Creator, Bilam turned to their
greatest failures, hoping that the mention of damning evidence against
them would create a chasm between them and Hashem. Each and every attempt
of his was transformed into a berachah; reading them, we learn what
dark intent first occurred to him.7
Thus, “He perceived no iniquity in Yaakov, and saw no perversity in
Israel”8 was Hashem’s unequivocal
retort to Bilam’s master strategy. Bilam believed that focusing on the
spiritual shortcomings of Klal Yisrael would strain and damage
their special relationship with Him. Hashem responds that He remains
eternally close to every Jew; disrupting the relationship is an
impossibility.
This waltz between intent and result maintains itself throughout the
parshah. When Bilam “set his face toward the wilderness”9 he wished to underscore (as Onkelos
explains) the great failing of Bnei Yisrael in making the Golden Calf
there. Again, Hashem not only confounded his plan, but turned Bilam’s
jaundiced vision into a berachah. Observing Bnei Yisrael “dwelling
according to its tribes,”10 he was
compelled to exclaim, “How goodly are your tents , O Yaakov, your
dwelling places, O Yisrael.”11 He saw
the peace and tranquility that reigned in their encampment, brought about
by the love that Bnei Yisrael felt for each other. Such love leads
directly to a love of Hashem. That love is the antidote to all failings,
even the sin of the Golden Calf.
Chazal teach12 that every attempted
curse that failed and that morphed into a berachah, ultimately
reverted back to a curse, with the exception of the berachah
regarding synagogues and batei medrash, which are alluded to in
the “tents” and “dwelling places.” The Saba Kadisha taught that
da’as (which we earlier saw as responsible for devekus)
incorporates the chochmah of the mind with the binah of the
heart. The mind and heart are fortresses which safeguard the elements
with which we attach ourselves to HKBH. Torah study purifies the mind, or
the beliefs, character traits and outlooks of a Jew. Prayer refines the
heart, so that it should not yearn for the forbidden, but long only for
Hashem. The beis medrash and the shul are emblematic of
these processes, standing for Torah study with the mind, and prayer of the
heart. Taken together, they constitute an eternally effective recipe for
the acquisition of the da’as necessary for devekus. They are
the guarantee of our uninterrupted connection to Hashem.
When Balak’s patience wears beyond the breaking point, he erupts in
anger. “To curse my enemies I summoned you, and behold you have
continually blessed them these three times!”13 Balak’s point is that Bilam failed miserably to
complete the task for which he was contracted. The number of failed
attempts seems irrelevant and gratuitous. Why does the Torah bother? The
premise of our approach to this parshah suggests an important
meaning to enumerating three distinct failures. They correspond to three
situations which frequently disturb our sense of to Hashem.
The first is preoccupation with lower desires and passions. Practically
speaking, the most common pitfalls for most men are in their appetites for
food and for women. Bilam alludes to this in his first
berachah. “Who has counted the dust of Yaakov, or numbered a
quarter of Yisrael?”14 The pasuk
alludes to food, which grows in the dust of the ground. Their great number
alludes to the process of procreation.
On his second attempt, Bilam was forced to exclaim, “He perceived no
iniquity in Yaakov, and saw no perversity in Israel.”15 Certainly, thought Bilam, there is no devekus
possible while a Jew occupies himself in the actual commission of a
transgression! Here, too, Hashem shows him to be wrong. A Jew never
fully enjoys his aveirah! In the midst of the deed, he already
feels remorse and guilt, showing that he cannot tear himself away from
Hashem.
Bilam’s third attempt deals with the Jew who does in fact lose himself in
so much transgression, that his detachment from G-d seems complete. Once
again, the words Hashem places in Bilam’s mouth counter his evil
design. “How goodly are your tents , O Yaakov, your dwelling places, O
Yisrael.”16 Rashi sees in these an
allusion to the different places that served as mishkan and Beis
Hamikdosh. Together, they point to the korbanos, which help a
Jew’s teshuvah, allowing him a way to regain the devekus
that he compromised.
While Bilam’s treacherous original plan failed completely, he was more
successful with his Plan B, a product of his diabolical da’as of
the kelipah. Bilam understood that there are two essential
elements in living as a Jew: emunah and kedushah. He hatched
a plan to entrap Bnei Yisrael through the wiles of the daughters of
Moav. In one fell swoop, Bilam involved them in both the avodah
zarah of the Moabites and in licentious carrying on with their women.
In one episode, he struck at both Jewish belief, and at Jewish holiness.
(Moreover, the two mutually enhance each other. The pure emunah of
a Jew helps him live according to the dictates of kedushah, while
the kedushah he achieves allows him greater clarity and insight,
bolstering his emunah .)
It would be a mistake to believe that Bilam has the final word. Far from
it. Even when both pillars of Jewishness are toppled, there is a way
back. Pinchas saves the day with his mesiras nefesh, staying the
plague that had already taken the lives of twenty-four thousand. When the
yetzer hora uses “conventional” weapons, we can resist it with
conventional force. When the yetzer hora wells up and seems to
fully take over, we must respond beyond what we would imagine to be our
limits! The mesiras nefesh of Pinchas, risking his life and thereby
opposing the strongest natural inclination of survival, represents acting
beyond our natural capability. This ability, too, is vouchsafed to every
Jew.
Bilam failed. Every curse of his became a berachah. Perhaps the
greatest of those berachos is what emerges from seeing the pattern
in the parshah from beginning to end. Through him, we discover
that there is nothing that ever need to disrupt the special relationship
we have with HKBH, Who has made ample arrangement to keep our bond firm
and forever intact.
1 Based on Nesivos Shalom, pgs. 129-135
2 Zohar sec.3 pg 305A
3 Moreh Nevuchim 3:51
4 Bereishis 4:1
5 A simple illustration of da’as of the kelipah might be the
ability some people have to create doubts concerning emunah in the minds
of their listeners through sophisticated arguments. Moshe was gifted in
his ability to explain Torah to Klal Yisrael as its master teacher. A
person in the reverse role would use his gift of clarity and expression to
teach heresy.
6 A very similar approach is taken by the Shalah HaKadosh
7 Sanhedrin 105B
8 Bamidbar 23:21
9 Ibid., 24:1
10 Ibid., 24:2
11 Ibid., 24:5
12 Sanhedrin 105B
13 Bamidbar 24:10
14 Ibid., 23:10
15 Ibid., 23:21
16 Ibid., 24:5
Text Copyright © 2008 by Rabbi Yitzchok Adlerstein and Torah.org
