Hamaayan / The Torah Spring
Edited by Shlomo Katz
Vayigash
Volume XVIII, No. 11
9 Tevet 5764
January 3, 2004
Sponsored by the Rutstein family
in memory of Nachman ben Osher Halevi a"h (9 Tevet)
Today's Learning:
Negaim 9:2-3
O.C. 147:7-148:1
Daf Yomi (Bavli): Menachot 89
Daf Yomi (Yerushalmi): Yevamot
In this week's parashah, we read that Yaakov descended to Egypt
with his family, thus beginning the long period of exile, and
later, bondage, in Egypt. Our Sages tell us that the famine that
was "supposed" to last for seven years ended after only two years
because Yaakov's arrival in Egypt brought blessing to that
country.
When we read last week's and this week's parashot, G-d's plan
seems relatively straightforward. The Jewish people needed to be
enslaved in Egypt, so G-d caused a famine that would bring about
Yaakov's migration to that country. That is apparently why the
famine ended as soon as Yaakov arrived - its purpose had been
accomplished.
At the end of this week's parashah, we read that the famine
caused nearly all of the wealth of Egypt and the surrounding
nations to become concentrated in Pharaoh's hands. Why does the
Torah relate this information? Seemingly, the story of the
famine has ended with Yaakov's arrival in Egypt!
The Zohar informs us that G-d's plan for history is not as
obvious as might appear. In fact, the famine had another purpose
other than bringing Bnei Yisrael to Egypt. More than two
centuries after the events described in this week's parashah,
Bnei Yisrael would leave Egypt carrying fabulous wealth. Where
did that wealth come from? The Zohar tells us that a key purpose
of the famine was to bring wealth to Egypt in order to fulfill G-
d's promise to Avraham (Bereishit 15:14): "Afterwards they shall
leave with great wealth." This explains why the Torah adds the
additional details about the famine that we find at the end of
the parashah. More importantly, perhaps, it teaches us an
important lesson about hashgachah pratit / G-d's "hands-on"
direction of history. It goes without saying that we often do
not perceive G-d's plan as history is developing. However, we
sometimes think that we do understand history after the fact.
Even this may not be so, the Zohar teaches. We thought we
understood the famine when we saw Yaakov descend to Egypt. In
fact, a primary purpose of the famine was not revealed until 210
years later. (Based on a lecture by R' Shlomo Naiman shlita)
"Then you will have brought me in my old age in sorrow to
she'ol." (44:29)
One meaning of "She'ol" is Gehinom. In the "olden-days,"
observed R' Yechezkel Levenstein z"l (mashgiach of the Mirrer
Yeshiva in Shanghai in the 1940's), people truly believed in the
existence of Gan Eden and Gehinom. Thus, as long as Yaakov
thought that Yosef was dead, Yaakov had no doubt at all that he
would descend to gehinom. (This was because he believed that he
had failed in his mission to create the twelve tribes of Israel.)
Similarly, Yosef's intention in acting cruelly to his brothers
was, according to Ramban, to lessen the punishment which they
would receive at the hands of G-d. He had no question at all
that G-d does punish people for their sins and he therefore
considered it to be in their best interests to suffer at Yosef's
hands in this world.
Today, continued R' Levenstein, we have lost this strong faith.
We ignore the fact that death is inevitable and every person will
have to answer for his deeds. The Gemara (Berachot 31a) relates
that the sage Mar Zutra was once asked to sing at a wedding. He
sang, "Woe to us that we will die." Apparently, this was not
considered inappropriate by the other guests. Imagine, in
contrast, the uproar that would ensue if a rabbi were to give
such a speech at a wedding today!
(Mi'mizrach Hashemesh)
"When they related to him all the words that Yosef had
spoken to them, and he saw the agalot / wagons that Joseph
had sent to transport him, then the spirit of their father
Yaakov was revived." (45:27)
Why was Yaakov's spirit revived when he saw the wagons that
Yosef sent? Rashi explains: As evidence that it was Yosef who
was sending a message to Yaakov, the Egyptian viceroy had
informed Yaakov's sons of the Torah subject he had been studying
with his father Yaakov when he last left him. It was the section
of the eglah arufah / the heifer that had its neck broken [when a
corpse was found murdered on the road - see Devarim 21:6]. This
is why the Torah says, "He saw the agalot that Yosef had sent,"
rather than, "that Pharaoh had sent." [Yosef made a play on
words, as agalot can mean both wagons and heifers.]
R' Yishayah of Tirani (Italy; 13th century) asks: Why had
Yaakov been studying the law of eglah arufah with Yosef when they
had parted 22 years before? He explains (based on the Talmud
Yerushalmi):
When Yosef left Yaakov's home, Yaakov accompanied him. Yosef
said to him, "Father, please go home so I will not be punished
for troubling you."
Yaakov answered: "In the future, there will be a law of eglah
arufah through which the elders of a town will receive atonement
for death of a murdered way-fairer. You might ask: why do those
elders need atonement? The answer is that the elders of a town
are responsible if a traveler is sent on his way without proper
provisions and accompaniment, and he is killed [either by other
travelers or while himself trying to rob other travelers].
Therefore, I, too, must accompany you down the road."
(Nimukei Chumash Le'Rabbeinu Yishayah)
"[Yosef] appeared before him, fell on his neck, and he wept
on his neck excessively." (46:29)
Rashi comments: Yaakov, however, did not fall upon Yosef's
neck, nor did he kiss him. Our Rabbis say that the reason was
that Yaakov was reciting the Shema.
Numerous commentaries ask: Why was Yaakov reciting the Shema?
If it was the time to recite the Shema, why did Yosef not do so?
If, on the other hand, it was not the time for Shema, why did
Yaakov recite it? R' Moshe Shick z"l ("Maharam Shick"; Hungary;
1805-1879) answers that it was not the time for reciting the
Shema, and Yaakov recited it for a different reason. He
explains:
One of the basic lessons of the verse Shema Yisrael is that
"Hashem is Elokeinu." By saying Shema, we acknowledge that there
is only One G-d, despite the fact that we see various
manifestations of Him. For example, Hashem is sometimes merciful
and sometimes strict. (The Name "Hashem" represents G-d's
Attribute of Mercy, while the Name "Elokim" represents G-d's
Attribute of Justice.) Although we rarely understand how this is
so, what we perceive as G-d's strictness is ultimately for our
own good; in the long-run, it is merciful.
For twenty-two years, the number of years that Yosef was
missing, Yaakov saw only the strict side of G-d's actions. But
when he saw Yosef's royal entourage, he understood that Yosef's
disappearance was part of Hashem's plan for saving Yaakov and his
family from famine. Ultimately, everything that had happened was
for the best; "Hashem is Elokeinu."
Realizing this, Yaakov recited the Shema. Yosef, however, had
already learned this lesson when he was freed from jail and
appointed viceroy. He had no reason to recite the Shema at this
moment.
(Maharam Shick Al Ha'Torah)
R' Asher Zelig Schwartz z"l (Romania; 1920's) offers another
answer to the above question: In verse 28, immediately preceding
Yaakov's reunion with Yosef, we read, "[Yaakov] sent Yehuda ahead
of him to Yosef, to prepare the way ahead of him in Goshen."
(Rashi explains that Yaakov sent Yehuda to establish a yeshiva
for the arriving immigrants.) In verse 30, immediately following
Yaakov's reunion with Yosef, we read, "Then Yisrael said to
Yosef, `Now I can die, after my having seen your face'." The
connection between verses 28 (establishing a yeshiva), 29
(reciting the Shema), and 30 (being willing to die) is as
follows:
The Gemara states: "If someone meets the yetzer hara and cannot
prevail against it, he should drag it to the bet midrash [where
he should study Torah]. If he thus defeats the yetzer hara,
good! If not, he should recite the Shema. If he thus defeats
the yetzer hara, good! If not, he should imagine the day of
death." Says R' Schwartz: Yaakov was afraid that seeing Yosef in
all his glory as Prime Minister would make him (Yaakov) feel
pride, or would bring out some other improper feeling. Yaakov
therefore took all of the steps suggested by the Gemara: he
established a bet midrash, he recited the Shema, and he imagined
the day of death.
R' Schwartz adds: If imagining the day of death is an effective
means of conquering the yetzer hara, why is it only the fall-back
strategy? Why does the gemara suggest first learning Torah and
reciting Shema? The answer is that we are expected to serve
Hashem with joy, something to which the third strategy does not
lend itself.
(Bet Asher)
R' Avraham Eliezer Alperstein z"l
R' Alperstein was born in Kobrin, White Russia in 1853. He
studied under R' Yaakov David Willowsky (the Ridvaz - rabbi in
Kobrin, Slutsk and, later, Chicago) and in yeshivot in Kovno and
Vilna, and he received semichah from two leading Lithuanian
sages, R' Mordechai Meltzer and R' A.L. Shachnowitz. As a youth,
R' Alperstein was known as an unusually capable student and was
found to be conversant in both the Talmud Bavli and Talmud
Yerushalmi. (The latter work usually is studied only by
accomplished scholars.)
R' Alperstein served briefly as a rabbi in Europe. In
approximately 1881, he settled in the United States and was
elected to a pulpit in New York. In 1884, he moved to Chicago,
where he was rabbi of the Kovner and Suvalker congregations. In
1899, he relocated to St. Paul, Minnesota.
In 1901, R' Alperstein returned to New York. There, he was an
early leader of Yeshiva Rabbeinu Yitzchak Elchanan (RIETS), which
later evolved into Yeshiva University. The following year, he
participated in the organizing convention of the Agudat
Harabanim / United Orthodox Rabbis of America and signed its
Constitution as one of its 59 charter members. Among the goals
of this group were to strengthen Jewish education by certifying
teachers and establishing standards that chadarim / Torah
elementary schools had to meet; to promote Shabbat observance by
providing employment assistance to Shabbat-observers and
encouraging labor unions to include the right to observe Shabbat
as one of their contract demands, and by promoting boycotts of
Jewish stores that did not close on Shabbat; and to strengthen
rabbinical supervision over kashrut and over Jewish marriage and
divorce.
R' Alperstein authored a number of Torah works, but published
only one -- a commentary on Masechet Bikkurim. That work,
published in 1889, bore a haskamah / letter of recommendation
from R' Yosef Dov Halevi Soloveitchik (the Bet Halevi), who
referred to the author as "a great light, sharp and with far
reaching knowledge, who is destined to be a gaon." R' Alperstein
died on 5 Shevat 5673 / January 13, 1913. After his death, a
hospital for chronic illnesses, Beth Abraham, was founded in his
memory by his wife and children. (Sources: Toldot Anshei Shem
p.3; The Silver Era p.315-325)
Copyright © 2003 by Shlomo Katz
and Torah.org
The editors hope these brief 'snippets' will engender further study
and discussion of Torah topics ("lehagdil Torah u'leha'adirah"), and
your letters are appreciated. Web archives at Torah.org
start with 5758 (1997) and
may be retrieved from the Hamaayan page.
Text archives from 1990 through the present
may be retrieved from
http://www.acoast.com/~sehc/hamaayan/. Donations
to HaMaayan are tax-deductible.
|