Torah.org Home Subscribe Services Support Us
 
Print Version

Email this article to a friend

Relatively Speaking

By Rabbi Daniel Travis

"And Yaakov said to them, “Brothers, where are you from?” (Bereshith 29:4)

Yaakov’s reference to the shepherds of Charan as “brothers” was not considered sheker, because it is permissible to call acquaintances and neighbors “brothers1.” Although this is allowed, was this not a compromise of Yaakov’s high standards of truth? Is it not preferable to be exact and precise, calling only one’s biological relative “brother”? In fact, it is not only permissible, but actually praiseworthy to use such expressions of fondness toward others. The Torah’s “ways of pleasantness” should be conveyed in one’s speech, for by using endearing expressions in our conversation we create bonds of friendship with others2.

The principle is especially relevant when talking to family members. Calling in-laws “Mom” and “Dad,” thereby letting them know that you feel they treat you like their own child, is part of the mitzvah of honoring them. By the same token, it is praiseworthy to refer to one’s son- or daughter-in-law as “Son” or “Daughter.” Although Yaakov had only one daughter, Dina, the Torah writes, “All of [Yaakov’s] sons and daughters tried to console him, but he refused to be comforted3.” The word “daughters” is used in its plural form because it refers to his daughters-in-law – “for a person does not hesitate to refer to his son-in-law as his son, or to his daughter-in-law his daughter4.”

So too, one can call a grandfather “Dad,” just as Yaakov prayed to “the God of his father, Avraham5,” although Avraham was his grandfather. Similarly, an adopted child can call his adoptive father “Dad” and his adoptive father can call him “Son,” since one who rears a child is comparable to the one who gave birth to that child6. It is common practice to call any family member or close friend “Uncle” or “Aunt.” This too is permitted, so long as one realizes that they are only terms of endearment, and that the individual is not really one’s relative7.

Footnotes:

1 Radak on Bereshith 29:4.
2 Orach Mesharim 9:10.
3 Bereshith 37:35.
4 Rashi ibid., citing Rav Nechemiah. See also Titein Emeth L’Yaakov, p. 97.
5 Bereshith 32:10.
6 Rema Choshen Mishpat, 42; Responsa Minchath Yitzchak 4:49.
7 Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach, cited in Titein Emeth L’Yaakov p.133, Niv Sefathayim 9:19 Chidushim.


Text Copyright © 2007 by Rabbi Daniel Travis and Torah.org


 

ARTICLES ON NASO:

View Complete List

Levi-like Actions
Rabbi Pinchas Winston - 5772

Realize Who You Really Are!
Rabbi Yisroel Ciner - 5760

Out Of Control
Rabbi Yochanan Zweig - 5770

> Harmonizing Without Homogenizing
Rabbi Label Lam - 5772

Possessive Nouns
Rabbi Mordechai Kamenetzky - 5760

Priestly Pipeline
Rabbi Pinchas Winston - 5767

Looking for a Chavrusah?

The Dilemma of Nisanel ben Tzuar
Rabbi Yissocher Frand - 5758

Behavioral Levis
Rabbi Berel Wein - 5761

It’s All in the Delivery
Rabbi Naftali Reich - 5767

Frumster - Orthodox Jewish Dating

An Ever Growing Badge of Courage
Rabbi Label Lam - 5769

A New Found Freedom
Rabbi Label Lam - 5774

Faith in Motion
Rabbi Naftali Reich - 5773

ArtScroll

Pennies From Heaven
Rabbi Mordechai Kamenetzky - 5758

Not Just One In A Crowd
Rabbi Yisroel Ciner - 5765

Out Of Control
Rabbi Yochanan Zweig - 5771

Rashi and the Four Minute Mile
Rabbi Dovid Green - 5759



Project Genesis

Torah.org Home


Torah Portion

Jewish Law

Ethics

Texts

Learn the Basics

Seasons

Features

TORAHAUDIO

Ask The Rabbi

Knowledge Base




Help

About Us

Contact Us



Free Book on Geulah!




Torah.org Home
Torah.org HomeCapalon.com Copyright Information