Parshas Beshalach
Bitachon in Redemption
God told Moshe, “Tell the Children of Israel to reverse direction before
Pi-HaChiros, between Migdol and the sea . . .” (Shemos 14:1-2)
The splitting of the sea was the coup d’etat. Apparently, the 10 plagues
back in Egypt, as spectacular as they had been, were just the warm up for
this. Watching the sea split, and then the Egyptians drown in the sea, was
the main point of the exodus, which was necessary to get if Kabbalas HaTorah
at Mt. Sinai was going to be worth the while.
So then, what was the main point of exodus? As we already said previously,
if it was only about freeing the Jewish people, it could have been done in a
far less spectacular manner. And, even though we already said that God
wished to show the Jewish people that His love for them even broke the
boundaries He set for Creation, was that the only point of Yetzias Mitzrayim?
There is one very important detail about the splitting of the sea that is
either unknown or unappreciated, which changes the direction of the entire
story. That is too bad, both personally and nationally, because it was, and
is, the entire point of the redemption from Egypt, and because it is also
the key to every subsequent redemption, including the final one for which we
are still waiting. Not knowing, or sufficiently appreciating it, is, in
fact, the reason that we are still waiting for it.
The Children of Israel walked into the midst of the sea upon dry ground,
and the water was a wall for them on their right and on their left. (Shemos
14:22)
Even though the Jewish people had no choice but to enter the sea in order to
escape the approaching Egyptian army, it still must have been a
nerve-wracking experience walking between two massive walls of water that,
at a moment’s notice, could return to their natural positions. It almost
happened, and as the Vilna Gaon points out, there is even a hint to this in
the verses:
The water returned and covered the chariots and the riders, and all of
Pharaoh’s forces that entered the sea after them; not one remained. The
Children of Israel, however, walked on dry land in the sea, and the water
was a wall—chomah—for them on their right and on their left. (Shemos
14:28-29)
The hint emerges from the slightly different spelling of the word
chomah—wall—that appears in both accounts. The first time chomah is used, it
appears with all four of its letters—Ches-Vav-Mem-Heh—whereas the second
time it is used, the Vav is missing: Ches-Mem-Heh.
Though the hidden Vav does not change the reading or meaning of the word on
the Pshat-level, on the level of Remez—Hint—it does allow for both the
reading and meaning to be changed. Without the Vav, the three letters of
Chet-Mem-Heh can be read as cheimah, which means “anger.”
This not a coincidence, explained the GR”A. The Torah is hinting to us
through this slight change of spelling that there was reason for God to be
angry at the Jewish people who crossed the sea on dry land, a very dangerous
situation. The question is, what happened all of a sudden to change the mood
of God at this most precarious moment in the redemption process?
Michah. According to the Midrash, Michah, who belonged to the Tribe of Dan,
had brought along with him an idol from Egypt. Being the last tribe to leave
the sea, there came a point when he was the only tribe to remain between the
walls of water, at which point the Attribute of Justice began to accuse him
before God.
For, as long as the rest of the Jewish nation were still crossing the sea,
the miracle was justified in their merit. However, once only the Tribe of
Dan remained in the sea, the Attribute of Justice complained before God that
the miracle should not be upheld on their account, because of the idol of
Michah (Likutei Torah, Derech Avos). Hence the word cheimah, alluding to the
anger God had towards the tribe of Dan for Michah’s idol.
Anger, yes. Destruction of the tribe, no. The question, is what stayed God’s
hand of strict justice? Why did He not carry through with the demand of the
angels to take Michah and his tribe to task for the idol worship they still
perpetrated?
The answer to this question is here:
It says in Shir HaShirim Rabbah (2:8:2): When Moshe came and told the
Jewish people: “In this month you will be redeemed,” they asked him, “Moshe
Rabbeinu, how can we be redeemed? All of Egypt is steeped in our idol
worship!” He answered them, “Since He wants you to be redeemed, He does not
look at your idol worship but instead ‘skips over mountains’ (Shir HaShirim
2:8)” . . . He explained to the Jewish people that The Holy One, Blessed is
He, was dealing with them on the level of the light of Arich Anpin called
Ayin, which works above any measure; it does not depend upon merit or
demerit. (Drushei Olam HaTohu, Chelek 2, Drush 4, Anaf 5, Siman 4)
The midrash is a play on a verse from Shir HaShirim about God “skipping over
mountains,” the mountain this time being the grave sin of idol worship.
Incredibly, when a keitz comes, that is, a destined time for redemption that
cannot be pushed off, God is prepared to even overlook a sin such as idol
worship, which is considered to be a rejection of the entire Torah, just to
redeem His people.
That is the reason why God did not exact punishment on the Tribe of Dan; His
desire to redeem the Jewish people overcame His desire to punish them, and
therefore, they were allowed to survive. The time would come in the future,
in the episode of the Concubine of Givah, when the nation would pay for
Michah’s idol, but not now, not while redemption was in the process.
However, there is another reason as to why God let the Tribe of Dan off the
hook at this time:
Nothing stands in the way of bitachon, as it says in the Midrash: “One
who trusts in God will be surrounded by kindness (Tehillim 32:10)—even an
evil person who trusts in God will be surrounded by kindness. (Midrash
Tehillim 32:10). It further says: “Many are the agonies of the wicked,
because they do not place their trust in The Holy One, Blessed is He” . . .
The Ramban says something similar: “This is why it says, ‘Trust in God and
do good’ (Tehillim 37:3), and it does not say, ‘Do good and trust in God,’
to teach that trust in God does not depend upon good deeds at all. Rather,
one should trust in God whether he is righteous or evil (Sefer Emunah
v’Bitachon, Ch. 1). (Drushei Olam HaTohu, Chelek 2, Drush 4, Anaf 5, Siman
4)
As the Nefesh HaChaim explains:
At the time of the splitting of the sea, God told Moshe, “Why are you
crying out to Me? Tell the Children of Israel to travel forward!” (Shemos
14:15). This means that their salvation was dependent upon them: If they had
enough faith and trust and traveled toward the sea, with confidence and
without fear, then this alone would cause the sea to split before them. It
would have prompted a response from above which would have led to the
necessary miracle to split the sea. (Nefesh HaChaim, Ch. 9)
In other words, the bitachon that the Tribe of Dan exhibited by walking into
the sea saved their lives while in the sea, in spite of the idol in their
possession. Bitachon does not wipe the slate clean of past sins; only
teshuvah or punishment can do that. However, in the meantime, it can save a
person from a certain disaster during a time of crisis, as was the crossing
of the sea. It is that powerful a trait. It is that important to God.
So, instead of running and trying to solve our problems and crises
pragmatically, we ought to spend a fair bit of time increasing our level of
bitachon. Not only can it help us more during those times of crises, but it
is necessary if God is going to overlook all of our shortcomings, the not so
serious ones and the serious ones, especially when the time for redemption
finally comes.
Text Copyright © 2013 by Rabbi Pinchas Winston and Torah.org.