Rabbi Frand on Shavuos These divrei Torah were adapted from the hashkafa portion of Rabbi Yissocher
Frand's Commuter Chavrusah Tapes on the weekly portion: Tape # 284, Birchas
HaTorah. Good Shabbos!
Dedicated This Year Le'eluy Nishmas Chaya Bracha Bas R. Yissocher Dov -
In memory of Mrs. Adele Frand
If Not For This Day, We Would Just Be 'Another Joe'
All brachos [blessings], with the exception of Birchas HaMazon [Grace After
Meals], are Rabbinic in origin. However, The Shaagas Aryeh (Rav Aryeh Leib
ben Asher Gunzberg; 1695-1785) argues that the bracha [blessing] recited
before learning Torah is Biblical in origin. The proof, the Shaagas Aryeh
says,
is a Talmudic passage in Nedarim [81a], which attributes the destruction
of the Land of Israel to the fact that Jews did not recite the blessing
before learning Torah. The Shaagas Aryeh argues that if this bracha was not
of Biblical origin, it would never have been singled out as the cause of
the destruction.
The Ran (1290-1375) in Maseches Nedarim quotes a novel insight into this
Gemara in Nedarim, in the name of Rabbeinu Yona (1200-1263). The Gemara in
Nedarim is expounding a pasuk [verse] in Yirmiyahu. The pasuk in Yirmiyahu
says that the destruction occurred because "they abandoned my Torah" [9:12].
Rabbeinu Yona explains that the reason why the Gemara did not want to
interpret the pasuk literally (that people abandoned the Torah and simply
did not learn it at all), was because the Gemara previously mentioned that
prophets and scholars were consulted regarding the interpretation of this
pasuk and none of them had an adequate interpretation. It would not have
been difficult to figure out the literal interpretation of the pasuk.
Therefore, Rabbeinu Yona explains that "they abandoned my Torah" must not
refer to something blatant or overt. The Gemara indicates that it was
necessary for G-d Himself to reveal to us the nature of the problem.
Rabbeinu Yona continues by explaining as follows: that generation certainly
occupied themselves with constant Torah learning. That was why no one could
figure out why the Land was destroyed until G-d, who knows the depths of
people's hearts, revealed the real source of the problem: People did not
recite the bracha over learning Torah. The Ran explains that this means that
they did not consider Torah prestigious enough to be worthy of a bracha.
People did learn Torah. Everyone had fixed times for studying Torah.
However, they did not consider the Torah learning so important. They did not
appreciate what they had. That is why they did not recite the bracha over
Torah.
When one studies Chemistry or Accounting or Law, one may find it
intellectually challenging. They may be deep and stimulating, but one does
not recite a Bracha over them. However, a Sefer Torah, a Chumash, a Medrash -
these do require a Bracha to demonstrate that we know the value of what we
have been given. The generation of the Destruction apparently lacked this
appreciation - to the extent that the Talmud says "they abandoned my Torah"
- i.e. - they did not even possess the Torah.
The Izbitcer Rebbe (Rav Mordechai Yosef Leiner of Izbice; died 1854) once
quoted an amazing Hagaos Ashrei (13-14th Century glosses on Rabbeinu Asher's
Commentary) in Tractate Bava Metziah to explain this idea of having
something, without REALLY having it. In the case cited there, Reuven bought
a piece of metal, which he believed was made out of lead. Reuven paid the
price based on the per pound value of lead. He subsequently sold the piece
of metal (presumably lead) to Shimeon, Later, Shimeon discovered that the
piece of metal was in fact silver and was worth far more than what he paid
for it. Upon hearing this, Reuven wanted to either receive full compensation
from Shimon or undo the whole sale.
The Hagaos Ashrei rules that Shimeon can keep the metal and need not make
any further payment to Reuven because Reuven never "owned" the silver. Since
Reuven never realized what he had - he thought he only had lead - he never
legally acquired the value of the silver. Since Reuven did not legally own
the silver, Simeon does not have to pay him for it.
The Ishbitzer Rebbe says this is the meaning of "they abandoned my Torah".
People can think they have the Torah, they can learn the Torah, and the
Torah can even be in their possession. But if they do not appreciate what
they have, then they do not have it. The prophet can accurately label this
"they have abandoned my Torah". According to Halacha, if one does not
appreciate what he has, he does not really have it.
This is one of the tasks that we must work on as we approach the Holiday of
Shavuos. We can never take for granted that which Torah does for us.
The Talmud relates [Pesachim 68b] that Rav Yosef would make a tremendous
party on Shavuos. He would say, "If not for this special day (on which the
Torah was given), look how many Yosefs there are in the market place". If
not for the fact that I as a Jew have that precious gift of Torah, I would
literally be 'just another Joe'.
Sometimes we forget the meaning of a world without Torah. A world without
Torah is just a matter of the thickness of the veneer. It is literally a
situation of "each man is prepared to swallow up his fellow man" [Pirkei
Avos 3:2]. The line between a human being and a wild animal - without the
guiding moral force of Torah - is indeed very thin. However, the Torah makes
us different and elevates us. The Torah makes us Godly instead of beastly.
Where would we be without this Torah? This is the essence of Shavuos.
On Shavuos we read the story of Rus and Orpah. Rus and Orpah were sisters,
daughters of Eglon King of Moab. They were from royalty. They had to choose
between going back to a strange land with a woman who was an old widow
without a possession in the world or returning to their father's palace. Who
really made the rational decision?
Rav Leib Chassman (1869-1935) once commented that if we look at the
situation with a cold calculating eye, Orpah clearly was the one who made
the logical decision. Rus made an irrational decision. Why follow Naomi? It
does not add up.
Rav Leib Chassman says that the only answer is that Rus realized the
difference between a life with Torah and a life without Torah. When the
dilemma was put into those stark terms, Rus had a relatively easy decision.
Life without Torah is not worth living. This is the essence of Shavuos.
Every Yom Tov has its own message - that idea which we are supposed to
appreciate about the holiday. The main idea that Shavuos must inculcate into
our psyches is "If not for this day, where would we be? What would we look
like without this Torah?" The scary thing is that if we fail to properly
appreciate that which Torah does for our lives, we are left with what the
Talmud calls "they have abandoned my Torah". This is our challenge as we
approach the Yom Tov of Shavuos. Everyone should have a good and meaningful
holiday.
Transcribed by David Twersky; Seattle, Washington. Technical Assistance by Dovid Hoffman; Yerushalayim.
This week's write-up is adapted from the hashkafa portion of Rabbi Yissocher
Frand's Commuter Chavrusah Torah Tapes on the weekly Torah portion (# 284).
The corresponding halachic portion for this tape is: Birchas HaTorah? The
complete list of halachic portions for parshas Bamidbar from the Commuter
Chavrusah Series are:
- Tape # 013 - Yerushalayim in Halacha
- Tape # 058 - Yom Tov in Yerushalayim
- Tape # 101 - Teaching Torah to Women
- Tape # 147 - Sefiras HaOmer, Shavuos & the International Dateline
- Tape # 194 - Can One Charge for Teaching Torah
- Tape # 240 - An Early Start for Shavuos?
- Tape # 284 - Birchas HaTorah
- Tape # 330 - Sefer Rus and Its Halachic Implications
- Tape # 374 - Bathing on Shabbos and Yom Tov
- Tape # 418 - Shavuos Issues -- Late Ma'ariv / Learning All Night
- Tape # 462 - May A Child Carry A Sefer on Shabbos
- Tape # 506 - Shavuos: Two Days, She'cheyanu, & Other Issues
- Tape # 550 - Opening Cans On Shabbos and Yom Tov
New! Yad Yechiel Institute is on-line! Visit http://www.yadyechiel.org !For information via email, you may also write to tapes@yadyechiel.org. Tapes or a complete catalogue can be ordered from: Yad Yechiel Institute PO Box 511 Owings Mills, MD 21117-0511 Call (410) 358-0416 for further information. Also Available: Mesorah / Artscroll has published a collection of Rabbi Frand's essays. The book is entitled: Rabbi Yissocher Frand: In Print and is available through your local Hebrew book store or from Project Genesis, 1-410-654-1799.
Rav Frand Books and Audio Tapes are now available for sale! Thanks to www.yadyechiel.org and Artscroll.com.
|