Rabbi Frand on Parshas Vayechi
These divrei Torah were adapted from the hashkafa portion of Rabbi
Yissocher
Frand's Commuter Chavrusah Tapes on the weekly portion: Tape # 531, Burial
In Eretz Yisroel. Good Shabbos!
Blessings Are "Between Man and His Fellowman"
Yaakov Avinu heard that his beloved son Yosef was coming to see him.
Despite the fact that he was very sick -- indeed, on his deathbed -- he
strengthened himself and sat up on the bed. [Bereshis 48:2] The Daas
Zekeinim m'Baalei haTosfos writes that he did not want to bless his son
and grandchildren lying down so that people should not say it was a
"deathbed gift" (matnas schiv m'rah) and that he was not of clear mind
at the time.
The Rosh Yeshiva of the Chevron Yeshiva analyzes this teaching. Rav Simcha
Zissel asks, "Who cares whether or not people thought Yaakov was lucid or
not at the time he gave blessings to Yosef and his children?" The
mechanics of a Tzadik's blessing [that of a Holy person] is that G-d hears
the blessing and by virtue of the "influence" the Tzadik has in Heaven,
the blessing is effective. As long as G-d knows "what the story is," so
to speak, it should be irrelevant what anyone else thinks regarding the
state of mind of the Tzadik when he uttered the blessing.
Rav Simcha Zissel says we learn from here that there is a difference
between a prayer (Tefillah) and a blessing (Beracha). When we pray, it is
strictly a dialogue "between man and G-d." A blessing, however, is
"between man and his fellow." A blessing only works if the recipient has
the
faith that the person who is giving him the beracha has the power and will
and desire to give that blessing. Ultimately, the one who blesses is not
the One who is dispensing the beracha. He is only a conduit. But the
recipient needs to have faith in him.
When a person goes to a Tzadik or a great person for a beracha, there
needs to be an implicit trust between "blessor" and "blessee". If the
recipient feels that the "blessor" is "out of it" or is somehow not worthy
or capable of giving a proper blessing, then it won't count.
It is for this reason, Rav Simcha Zissel says, that Yaakov Avinu had to
sit up on his bed - so that it not be said that it was the blessing of
someone lying on his deathbed (matnas schiv m'rah).
Every Rule Has Its Exception
Yaakov Avinu told Yosef that his children - Menashe and Ephraim -- would
have the status of Yaakov's own children, Reuvain and Shimeon. They
would be considered like sons. Yaakov positioned Menashe opposite Yaakov's
right hand, thinking that his firstborn should receive the "stronger"
blessing. However Yaakov crossed his hands, placing his right hand on
Ephraim who was at his left side and placing his left hand on Menashe who
was at his right side. [Bereshis 48:13-14]
I saw an insight in the name of Rav Yaakov Kamenetsky, zt"l. The Gemara
says [Shabbos 10b] that a person should never show favoritism among his
children, because the entire incident of the sale of Yosef and its entire
aftermath -- leading to the exile in Egypt -- all came about because
Yaakov showed favoritism to his son Yosef. If there is anyone who should
have learnt his lesson from the pitfalls of such favoritism, it is Yaakov.
Why does Yaakov appear to be making the very same mistake all over
again on his deathbed? Was he not showing favoritism to Yosef's
grandchildren over his other grandchildren, just as he had showed
favoritism to Yosef over his other brothers those many decades earlier?
Why is he now saying: "All other grandchildren are only grandchildren, but
these grandchildren are like children?" History seems to be repeating
itself!
And if it is not bad enough that Yaakov is not concerned about the
jealousy between the cousins - what about sibling rivalry? Even between
Menashe and Ephraim, he singles out the younger son Ephraim for clear
favoritism!
Rav Yaakov Kamenetsky offers an amazing chiddush [novelty] in raising
children: The rule is that a person should never show favoritism among
children. But the Rule of Rules is that "to every rule there is an
exception." Rav Yaakov insists that there are exceptions to the rule that
one should not show favoritism to any of his children. There are some
times that one child requires more time, more effort, or more concern than
another child.
Anyone who has more than one child knows that different children require
different things. When selecting automobiles, there are "high maintenance
vehicles" and "low maintenance vehicles." The same thing applies with
children. Some children are "low maintenance children". They go to school,
they behave, they make their bed, they brush their teeth, they are
respectful - everything wonderful! However, some children are just the
opposite.
Rav Yaakov Kamenetsky says that when a person sees that for whatever
reason, be it physically, emotionally, psychologically, or just natural
disposition -- one child requires more than another, the parent has to do
what he has to do for whatever that child needs. One has to try to explain
it to the other children and hope and pray that they will understand.
A person should not do this capriciously or without reason. That is the
point of the previously cited Gemara. For whatever reason, the calculation
Yaakov made vis a vis the favoritism he showed Yosef was in error. But
Yaakov now saw clearly that Ephraim and Menashe had to be treated
differently than the other grandchildren.
Why did they need to be treated differently? The other grandchildren grew
up in a support system. They all had uncles and aunts and cousins. They
all had a Zeida (grandfather). They had a reinforcing family environment.
Ephraim and Menashe were out there alone, two children in Egypt. They were
the only Jews in town. It's like trying to raise a Jewish family in Great
Falls, Montana. There is nobody there. Kids that grow up in Great Falls,
Montana are different than kids who grow up in Baltimore, Maryland.
This explains the special treatment given to Yosef's children over the
other grandchildren. What about the special treatment given to Ephraim
over Menashe?
Rav Yaakov Kamenetsky explains that Menashe was called Menashe "ki nishani
es kol amali v'es kol beis avi" [Bereshis 41:51] (because G-d had made me
forget all my hardship and all my father's household). He was a child that
represented "the Old Country". When Menashe was born, Yosef was still
sensitive to all that he had gone through. This child was a throw-back to
my father's home. But Ephraim was given that name "ki hifrani Elokim
b'eretz onyee" [41:52] (G-d has made me fruitful in the land of my
suffering). He was a child of the new world.
Ephraim needed to be handled differently than Menashe. If he was not given
this special kind of treatment, Yaakov Avinu suspected that something
could happen to him. He therefore made the calculation and said that
Ephraim had to be given added support. Consequently "he crossed his
hands."
Justice has to be uniform, but chinuch (education; child-rearing) does not
have to be uniform. It CANNOT be uniform. The Nesivos HaMishpat expands on
a drasha found in Bava Basra [8b]. The Gemara there homiletically
interprets the pasuk in Daniel [12:3] "And they that be wise shall shine
as the brightness of the firmament; and they that turn many to
righteousness like the stars for ever and ever." The Gemara says the first
half of the pasuk refers to judges; the latter half refers to teachers of
young children.
The Nesivos Hamishpat develops this thought: The judge is compared to a
bright monochromatic light because Justice is the same for everyone. But
the teachers of young children are compared to stars. Stars have different
colors. There are blue, orange, and yellow stars. Likewise different
lights must be shone onto different children. One cannot use the same
methods of illumination for every child. The teacher (and all parents are
teachers), unlike the judge dispensing justice, cannot dispense his
teachings uniformly to all students. Chinuch has to be tailor-made.
Transcribed by David Twersky; Seattle, WA DavidATwersky@aol.com
Technical Assistance by Dovid Hoffman; Baltimore, MD dhoffman@torah.org
This write-up was adapted from the hashkafa portion of Rabbi Yissocher
Frand's Commuter Chavrusah Torah Tape series on the weekly Torah portion.
The complete list of halachic topics covered in this series for Parshas
VaYechi are provided below:
Tape # 037 - Establishing Time of Death
Tape # 079 - The Yissocher-Zevulun Partnership
Tape # 128 - The Sandik
Tape # 175 - Embalming, Autopsies, and Cremation
Tape # 221 - Exhumation: When Is it Permitted?
Tape # 265 - Yahrtzeit
Tape # 311 - Funerals in Halacha
Tape # 355 - Asarah B'Teves
Tape # 399 - Baruch Shem K'vod Malchuso L'Olam Voed
Tape # 443 - Aveilus Issues
Tape # 487 - Determining Date of Moshiach's Arrival
Tape # 531 - Burial in Eretz Yisroel
Tape # 575 Honoring an Older Brother
Tape # 619 Fulfilling the Wishes of the Deceased
Ta[e # 663 - Belief in the Coming of Moshiach
Tapes or a complete catalogue can be ordered from the
Yad Yechiel Institute, PO Box 511, Owings Mills MD 21117-0511.
Call (410) 358-0416 or e-mail tapes@yadyechiel.org or visit
http://www.yadyechiel.org/ for further information.
Text Copyright © 2007 by Rabbi Yissocher Frand and Torah.org.
Transcribed by David Twersky; Seattle, Washington.
Technical Assistance by Dovid Hoffman; Yerushalayim.
Rav Frand Books and Audio Tapes are now available for sale! Thanks to www.yadyechiel.org and Artscroll.com.